Thread: PET vs CAT
View Single Post
Old 09-18-2007, 05:47 AM   #3
Sherryg683
Senior Member
 
Sherryg683's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,014
CAT scans will show an adnormal area, such as tumors, it can also show things that are not cancerous tumors, it does not distinguish between the two. Just shows something is there. PET scans uses the sugar dye contrast on the assumption that cancerous cells will absorb this sugar faster than normal cells and they will "light" up on the PET scan. Cons with just a PET scan alone is that there are many false positives, one study said up to around 48 percent. Usually these scans are used together. They lay the PET on top of the CAT scan and if an area that lights up on the PET, also shows a tumor area on the CAT then they are more likely to consider it indeed cancerous. A biopsy is usually need to determine cancer for sure...sherryg
__________________
Sherry

Diagnosed: December , 2005 at age 44
13+ positive lymph nodes
Stage IV , Her2+, 2 small mets to lungsChemo Started: Jan, 2006
4 months Taxotere, Xeloda, Hercepin
NED since April 2006!!
36 Rads to follow with weekly Herceptin indefinately
8 years NED now
Scans every year

Life is not about avoiding the thunderstorms, it's about learning to dance in the rain!
Sherryg683 is offline   Reply With Quote