View Single Post
Old 09-01-2007, 12:18 PM   #4
Christine MH-UK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 414
I hope this 'cost-saving' gets someone to fund bigger short treatment studies

I am not thinking so much of FinHer as smaller studies like Hurley's regime HCT->AC, which did extremely well in women with stage III BC, or Buzdar's study where (Taxotere+Herceptin)->(FEC+Herceptin) had no recurrences (although I suspect that the Herceptin should be tried with lapatinib, which is synergistic with FEC at the cell level, one because it just seems like there must be a cardiotoxicity issue mixing it with FEC, an anthracycline, even though there supposedly wasn't one in the small trial).

While I don't think New Zealand has done the right thing in adopting FinHer without treating it as somewhat of a trial, it would be worthwhile to patients to know if short-term herceptin is effective. Herceptin's great, but going to the hospital for a whole year has caused some patients I know to have trouble getting on with their life. I for one found the cancer hospital to be a real downer. I had herceptin insomnia, too. I'm not knocking herceptin, which is a great drug, but a year is very long and I know some very high risk patients who had hardly finished herceptin when they recurred, which doesn't seem fair. Plus, shorter treatments should at the very least mean fewer MUGAS.
Christine MH-UK is offline   Reply With Quote