View Single Post
Old 09-01-2007, 07:40 AM   #2
Becky
Senior Member
 
Becky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Stockton, NJ
Posts: 4,179
A normal number is below 36. When I was getting mine done before I had the ovaries removed, it ran between 6 and 10.

CA125 is very reliable when done in conjunction with the transvaginal ultrasound but when done alone, it can be meaningless for some women. What I mean is that many women on this board report that their CA27/29 is very reliable for predicting (for them) that their mets are improving (or not improving). It is meaningful for them. For others, it is not meaningful. It is the same with CA125 although you don't know if its meaningful or not to you unless you get ovarian cancer. But many studies say the ultrasound and tumor marker together are good.
__________________
Kind regards

Becky

Found lump via BSE
Diagnosed 8/04 at age 45
1.9cm tumor, ER+PR-, Her2 3+(rt side)
2 micromets to sentinel node
Stage 2A
left 3mm DCIS - low grade ER+PR+Her2 neg
lumpectomies 9/7/04
4DD AC followed by 4 DD taxol
Used Leukine instead of Neulasta
35 rads on right side only
4/05 started Tamoxifen
Started Herceptin 4 months after last Taxol due to
trial results and 2005 ASCO meeting & recommendations
Oophorectomy 8/05
Started Arimidex 9/05
Finished Herceptin (16 months) 9/06
Arimidex Only
Prolia every 6 months for osteopenia

NED 18 years!

Said Christopher Robin to Pooh: "You must remember this: You're braver than you believe and stronger than you seem and smarter than you think"
Becky is offline   Reply With Quote