Thread: new
View Single Post
Old 05-17-2007, 09:15 AM   #7
saleboat
Senior Member
 
saleboat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 250
Hello,

I just have to add-- the removal of one's ovaries is in no way the standard of care for women who have strongly hormonally positive EARLY stage breast (Stages I-III) cancer. While some doctors may recommend it, and some women may elect to do that for either BRCA reasons, or peace of mind, there are serious health risks that should be considered, plus it has not been shown to be an effective treatment given all the new therapies that are now available. It was once the standard of care, many years ago, before the anti-hormonals were available.

If you would like an article that details the health risks, especially for younger women, of the removal of one's ovaries, please let me know.

I did go to three different Oncs on this issue, and they were all in agreement given my age. One even called it 'surgical castration' which shocked me.

Jen

__________________
dx 4/05 @ 34 y.o.
Stage IIIC, ER+ (90%)/PR+ (95%)/HER2+ (IHC 3+)
lumpectomy-- 2.5 cm 15+/37 nodes
(IVF in between surgery and chemo)
tx dd A/C, followed by dd Taxol & Herceptin
30 rads (or was it 35?)
Finished Herceptin on 7/24/06
Tamox
livingcured.blogspot.com

"Keep your face to the sunshine and you cannot see the shadow." -- Helen Keller
saleboat is offline   Reply With Quote