View Single Post
Old 04-13-2007, 06:17 AM   #4
Shell
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 301
I have been on both, and navelbine is much easier to endure (except for the counts issue and, for me, the runny nose) than if you experience the H/F issues and/or diarrhea with the xeloda. If you choose the xeloda route, of course you should make sure you take tykerb with it, since for those of us in the trial, it delayed our time to progression.

Good luck with your choice, and may the 1st one bring success!

Regards,
__________________
Shell

init diag 3/17/03-stage IIIC
ER-/PR-/HER2+++
CET x4 neo-adjuvant
lump & SNB 8/03
CET x2
radiation and herceptin/navelbine 11-03-1/04
1st reoccur to lymph nodes 8/04
complete axillary dissection 12/04
herceptin/taxotere til progression (lungs) 3/05
xeloda w/out lapatinib trial 6/05
lapatinib/tykerb added 4/06
ended trial 8/06 due to progression
doxil / avastin 11/06-12/06 - wasn't working
navelbine/herceptin/avastin 12/06/3/07 - progression
gemzar/carboplatin/tykerb 4/07
mri shows extensive mets to bone in pelvic area 6/07
switched to abraxane (3 on/1 off) + tykerb 6/07
Shell is offline   Reply With Quote