Thread: omega 2, 6, 9 ?
View Single Post
Old 10-07-2006, 01:39 PM   #13
heblaj01
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 543
Omega-3 fatty acids: triacylglycerols vs semi-synthetic ethyl esters

Sarah's interesting post (above: titled fish oil omega 3 for the heart) has a link to the Solvay Co web site dealing with their product called Omacor in which site I learned a few more facts on Omega-3 fish oils.

In particular, I noticed that their product was directly absorbed from gut to liver. This contradicted what I knew (& posted further above in this thread) that Omega-3 fish oils (chiefly EPA & DHA long chain fatty acids) are absorbed through the lymphatic system which may have advantages in terms of increased bioavailability & half life.

As it happens Omacor is not like most common fish oil pills in the form of triacylglycerols but is a semi-synthetic ethyl ester of fish oil which is indeed absorbed through the liver.

Which one is better? I am not sure & experimental data comparing triacylglycerols & ethyl esters are few.

These points (besides bioavailability) can help in deciding:
- Omega-3 triacylglycerols are usually lower in EPA/DHA content per pill.
This means that 40% or more of pills is made of medium chain Omega 6 & 9 & perhaps small quantities undesirable pollutants in the least refined
products.

- Omega-3 ethyl esters are usually 90 to 95% EPA/DHA which leaves only 5
to 10% for other medium chain fatty acids.
Since they are first absorbed by the liver high doses may be less tolerable
especially for those having impaired liver function.
heblaj01 is offline   Reply With Quote