Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Sweetsnflwr,

A bit of historical information might help you, because it may help to understand the actual lack of logic behind standard recommended treatment and why doctors "don't know" all the answers.

At the time Herceptin (trastuzumab) was being offered through clinical trials WITH chemotherapy to see whether the Herceptin would be helpful or not, for the most part "early stage" patients who were HER2 positive were not allowed to participate in the trials. Even after the trials for mostly later-stage HER2 positive bc patients showed Herceptin helped, for a while there was no recommendation for early stage bc patients who had "missed out" on Herceptin, to then be given Herceptin.

Over the years since then, the trials have not been done to show whether chemotherapy is necessary WITH Herceptin for early stage bc, or whether Herceptin ALONE is sufficient. It sounds pretty dumb to anyone with a brain and especially dumb to the people who have to go through the trauma, emotional and economic, of adding chemotherapy to treatment (along with all the support drugs for chemotherapy, such as steroids, blood boosters, etc.) But that is the status quo that all of us have had to base our choices for treatment upon.

Some of those who originally "missed out" on Herceptin found oncs who were willing to give them Herceptin "late". I am one who did not, and have never had Herceptin although I did have CAFx6 chemotherapy followed initially by some tamoxifen. I lost my hair and it regrew. I also had DCIS and a 1.6 cm IDC. I have not had recurrence. Some patients go all out and have the strongest therapies possible; some recur anyway and some don't, and most deal with the side effects of treatment regardless.

Age makes a difference. Younger patients have more recurrence. I was 51 at diagnosis.

It is hard to make the choices, based on the lack of adequate information.

AlaskaAngel

P.S. In the countries with more health care money and facilities, t is now standard to give chemotherapy plus Herceptin to patients with HER2 positive IDC. Some give 9 weeks of Herceptin and some give a year of it.

The first 2 years are the highest risk for recurrence, and from my vague impression of those on this board, those with early stage HER2 positive bc who have gotten past that point have generally not recurred whether or not they had chemotherapy and/or Herceptin -- but again, age also may make a difference.

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Hello AlaskaAngel, I am new to this site.Had b/c in 2003 ,stage II her2+++ and "missed out" on Herceptin age 34.I was given 4 AC and 4 Taxol.In 2010 on a routine ct scan they found mets on my lungs.I believe if I would have taken Herceptin I would not have had a recurrence.Currently on Herceptin only every 3 weeks and mets are smaller and stable.

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Pmoore- My point exactly, I am so sorry to hear about this - but I am glad they are stable. I am going to visit my oncologist tomorrow and get to the bottom of my treatment as I am not happy with what I have been hearing for the last 2 days about me not having any chemo or being put on herceptin since I am HER2+++!! I am irritated and very concerned about my condition. I just had CT and Bone Scans May 11th and they were both clear... I get those every year for the next 5 years but that still doesn't solve my problem. bless your heart keep your chin up!

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

I was considered in a "grey area" when it came time to decide on treatment. My cancer was "small" and I was node negative. I sought a few opinions. One was with a highly regarded consultant. She felt I needed NO further treatment based on my statistics. Not even an AI! Long story short, I chose to go the route of chemo and Herceptin anyhow. Partly out of fear (not a good bases for a decision!) and partly out of feeling I needed to do MORE. And so I would not feel regret later (I am big on regrets!). I feel you are in that same place. Your oncologists reasoning may be sound and logical, but sometimes logic is not a factor when one is the patient!
I hope you can obtain a second opinion and also have a good conversation with your onc. And mostly I hope you find peace of mind. Keep the faith.

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Hi pmoore,

I agree, Herceptin is a meaningful addition; the question of chemotherapy WITH it is open. I should add, also, that although early stage includes stage II such as yourself, the group of stage I's who either did not do chemo or did not do Herceptin are those who don't seem to have recurred long-term. Thanks for posting.

AlaskaAngel

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

AlaskaAngel- Are you saying that more Stage 1 patients that opt not to have chemo or herceptin didnt have recurrance? Please explain that last statement...

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Hello, I thought I was in the clear after 5+ years. I tend to get upset and angry that I was never given Herceptin .However I keep telling myself it was not approved yet in 03' for my stage of cancer.Still I do think what if...

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Pmoore- That is where I am at... I have been doing alot of research on this and found this site a few days ago and have learned more about HER2+++ than I ever knew. I think Herceptin is something I should consider just to be safe. I understand your anger I would be too... And all along alot of my friends have said, why didn't you have to have chemo or radiation? Because my nodes were negative... that was what I was told. And we were dealing with a tumor size 1.5mm regardless of size it grew in my body period. He also stated that cancer cells can travel and can not be seen with the naked eye or even on Ct or Bone Scans. It sounds like a good protocol for me - in my gut I have a feeling this is going to come back to haunt me again. And if I can stop that from happening I am going to do it. Positive thoughts and a big big HUG to your Pmoore! keep your chin up! xoxo!

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Sweetsnflwr,

It is still a shot in the dark regardless because the evidence was generally not collected in terms of the addition of chemotherapy. (There is no garantee for any of us no matter what the therapy is.) As noted in another conversation/thread here, the "right" chemotherapy for the "right" patient is not known yet, so, much of the time chemotherapy is given, whether or not one recurs, one cannot know if it helped or not.

My comment is only a reassurance in that from what I have noticed here, stage 1's who have made it past 2 years out have not generally recurred, whether or not they have had chemo/herceptin.

There are those who have VERY small tumors who still may recur -- and some of those who do all therapy STILL may find thay may not be protected by chemotherapy and Herceptin.

It is completely understandable that anyone may prefer to exercise all caution, and do all therapy. But the actual clear documented basis for it is minimal, particularly for stage 1.

AlaskaAngel

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

I had small tumors Stage I -.5 cm and 1.2 cm. Still did the TCH protocol. As stated above I would get a second opinion at a cancer center. This is a common mixture for HER2. If you get put on herceptin or chemo ask for a port to be put in, a lot easier then getting your arms stuck. I lost my hair but it comes back pretty fast. Mine is curently curly (cowlick), kinda liking it. You'll have a lot of questions to post if your Dr decides to go the chemo or herceptin route but there are an abundance of us here to answer them for you. Good Luck.

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Now I totally feel that I have been guided in the wrong direction regarding my treatment. If I am requesting or requiring my doctor to put me on this treatment program that is my request I can do that right? I would rather do it than not. I keep reading all of your stories and the last post that came from snolan her tumor was smaller than mine and she received the protocal - I am anxious now to talk to him tomorrow. There is another Cancer doctor that everyone says is a great oncologist so if Dr. Reddy doesnt agree then I will suggest speaking to Dr. Matar. Thank you everyone today for all the information... I am stunned and in shock that they didnt put me on chemotherapy. I mean we never know if it will kill it or come back but we at least have to try and fight right? I will do whatever is necessary!

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Don't forget that YOU are in charge. You dont have to have anyone's permission to go get a second opinion. You just request your records and take them to the appointment. It would be great, of course, if you and your onc came to an understanding. Keep the faith. Let us know what happens.

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Okay I am going to throw my 2 pennies in. You had a 1.5 mm so that is VERY small, serious but small. I know one person who had a small idc who did not have chemo or herceptin and she is 3+ years out. Another swimangel (on here) I believe had a small amount of idc and had navelbine (just hair thinning) and herceptin for the year. So there are 2 schools of thoughts.

Another is if treatment would be offered because you are so far out from surgery. I would get the second opinion and see what they say, it's not going to hurt. ((hugs))

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Well today is the day going to oncologist at 10 a.m. I am anxious to see what he tells me. I will update ya'll as soon as I know something. This has been weighing on my mind so long.

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

I visited with my oncologist today. No treatment other than tamoxifen at this point. Since my tumor was 1.5 mm it is too small to even meet the protocol for Herceptin/Chemotherapy. He offered that I could get a second opinion and offered to set up the appointment for me and referred me to 3 breast Oncologist in Kansas City. He sit with me and explained everything and that since the tumor was caught so early and I was node negative that even the Oncologist Board would question him putting me on herceptin and chemotherapy. He is only doing the bone and ct scans due to famly history otherwise there wouldn't even be that given the size of the tumor. He is currently monitoring my blood and liver enzimes and said if those numbers start to come up then we would have a problem. I feel more at ease and even the fact that he offered to set me up for a second opinion makes me feel good. I am thankful for everyones input regarding the HER2+ questions that I had - I will continue to be monitored and have lab work every 3 months. I found out a lot about my breast cancer this week and I am thankful for this website... you ladies are awsome! Thank you again!!!

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Yep -- HER-2 learning more is a good thing!

It is a trade-off of sorts -- between doing a choice of treatment now, versus later IF needed; the advantages to waiting are that more is likely to be known later, with newer treatments by that time -- and -- more flexibility in making your choice, whatever it might be. Some have found that by making a particular choice early on, their choices were more limited when they did want to do more treatment. HARD, HARD choices to make.

A.A.

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Hello Sunflower -

I have been following this thread and wondering how it would turn out.

I have 2 questions. First, I did not catch anything about a family history till your post today. What is that? It is NOT usual to have a patient take so many scans at stage 1. Bloodwork - yes.

What kind of med insurance do you have? Is it an HMO? These are all about limiting expenses - sometimes at the expense of their PATIENTS!

Please keep your other opinion appointment. Your tumor was Grade 3, which is aggressive. In an age when we have a drug such as Herceptin which is proven effective, I don't see why you could not have been given the FINHER trial amount of 9 weeks worth at a minimum.

Keep poking and prodding until you are satisfied that you have the best treatment for your indivdual case.

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

You onc sounds like he is thoughtful and reasonable. I am glad you had this conversation and the peace of mind you wanted. I am also glad you will be getting a second opinion.
Keep the faith!

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Sorry I left out family history... Let's begin... My Mother died in 1995 of Stage IV breast cancer which lead to secondary breast cancer in her bones. She was diagnoised in 1990 had her right breast removed and that is where they found my cancer and 23 of her lymph nodes were positive malignancy. She had no chemo they put her straight on tamoxifen and the cancer went into her bones 6 months later she lived until June 29, 1995 I was 25 years old when she passed. My oldest sister on my father's side no relation to my Mother, she died at age 54 Stage IV Breast Cancer, My other sister on my father's side age 60 diagnoised with Breast Cancer and two Aunt's as well on Father's side. Oncologist believes this cancer is coming from Father's side as I have a sister on Mother's side with no cancer at all she is at 56. I am the 12th child but my sister's are all half and I have brother's too a total of 7 brothers and 3 sisters. My Mother had 7 kids me being the 7th and my Father had 5 kids me being the 5th. I am the only child from my Mother and Father. I do not know my Mother's diagnosis like HER2+++ or ER/PR+? I have no idea as when she got cancer I was only 17 or 18 and was not up on all the health information at that time. One sister had DCIS with lumpectomy and radiation, my other sister who passed it had spread to her liver before they found out it had started in her breast. So there are so many of close relatives that have been diagnosed that is why he is watching it closely with ct and bone scans... I know pretty crazy in the least.

Re: HER2 learning more is it a bad thing?
 

Also my oncologist told me it was a T1a today my tumor.. what does that mean anyone know?