View Full Version : medical mistakes, including brest cancer, show today on Oprah
RobinP
03-10-2009, 01:21 PM
http://www.youngsurvival.org/blocks/_Forum/style_images/1/spacer.gif
I know many of us suffered a breast cancer misdiagnosis here, including myself. For that reason I will be tuning into Oprah's medical mistakes show today. I was a little disappointed, though, that she is featuring a woman who had her breast removed and later found there was no cancer at all. Somehow these kind of stories make it to the media easier than the reversed where a cancer diagnosis is missed. I much rather see a misdiagnosis story of breast cancer presented on Oprah today to increase the awareness of this epidemic.
Believe51
03-10-2009, 01:28 PM
Drats, I cannot see it. If you get a link or something please post, Robin, I am very interested.>>Believe51
fauxgypsy
03-10-2009, 07:09 PM
That would have been interesting. Sorry I missed it.
StephN
03-10-2009, 07:29 PM
I saw that segment and the problem was that a lab tech was working on slides of two patients at once and mislabeled them. Which MEANS that the lady who did have breast cancer was told she did NOT. However, the lady who had a neck cancer and was being tested for that ended up having a mast when she did not need it.
The message there was to get second opinions which includes getting some tissue for retesting. In this case the error would most likely have been caught.
ElaineM
03-10-2009, 09:09 PM
I saw it. There were some very good suggestions which serve as reminders for all of us. Maybe those who missed it can get some of the information from the show on Oprah's website.
Diagnostic errors: The new focus of patient safety experts: JAMA commentary highlights problem, suggests solutions to reduce the number of diagnoses that are missed, wrong or delayed
[Eureka News Service]
Johns Hopkins patient safety experts say it's high time for diagnostic errors to get the same attention from medical institutions and caregivers as drug-prescribing errors, wrong-site surgeries and hospital-acquired infections. Diagnostic misadventures represent a potentially much larger source of preventable health problems and deaths than many of the more popular targets of safety reform, they say in a commentary in the March 11 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
In the article, David Newman-Toker, M.D., Ph.D., and Peter Pronovost, M.D., Ph.D., report that misdiagnosis accounts for an estimated 40,000 to 80,000 hospital deaths per year and that tort claims for diagnostic errors — defined as diagnoses that are missed, wrong or delayed — are nearly twice as common as claims for medication errors.
Typically, they note, diagnostic errors were thought to originate with individual doctors lacking the training or skill they should have, but blaming physicians hasn't produced many solutions. As with successful approaches to reducing treatment errors, they point out that reducing diagnostic errors will likely require a focus on larger "system" failures that affect medical practice overall.
"Moving away from a model that chastises individual physicians to one that focuses on improving the medical system as a whole could offer big payoffs for improving diagnostic accuracy as well as the cost effectiveness of care," says Newman-Toker, assistant professor of neurology with joint appointments in otolaryngology, health sciences informatics, epidemiology, and health policy and management at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. "Right now," he adds, "there is often a mismatch between who gets advanced diagnostic testing and who needs it, leading to worse outcomes and higher costs. Realigning resources with needs could improve outcomes at lower cost."
Much as bloodstream infections in intensive care units have decreased through systematic solutions adopted by hospitals, such as requiring physicians to follow a procedural checklist that emphasizes sterile techniques when inserting medical catheters, Newman-Toker and Pronovost suggest that system-wide solutions could be the key for decreasing diagnostic errors.
For example, Newman-Toker notes, triage protocols in emergency departments often categorize patients with typically benign symptoms, such as isolated headache, as being at "low-risk" of having a bigger problem, even though such symptoms are sometimes indicative of dangerous conditions, such as a bleeding brain aneurysm. A systems fix that could decrease diagnostic errors might be to change the overall rules for the triage protocol so that it considers specific symptom details that help distinguish between "low-risk" and "high-risk" types of headache.
The Johns Hopkins team suggests that diagnostic errors might be reduced by systematically adopting tools such as checklists that help physicians remember critical diagnoses or by making available computer programs known as "diagnostic decision-support systems" that assist physicians in calculating the level of risk of a given patient's having certain diseases. Health systems could further decrease diagnostic errors, they say, with time-tested, low-tech tools such as independent second looks at X-rays and CT scans or rapidly directing patients with unusual symptoms to diagnostic experts.
Because diagnostic errors can be tricky to track to their roots, Pronovost, an expert on breaking down complex medical problems, says more research is needed to understand and find patterns in the origins of such errors. Pronovost, a professor of anesthesiology, critical care medicine and surgery, is medical director of Johns Hopkins' Center for Innovation in Quality Patient Care.
"The first step in addressing the diagnostic error problem is to shine a light on them so they are clearly visible," Pronovost says. "Then with wise investments, clinicians, researchers and patients can discover how to prevent them."
RobinP
03-17-2009, 10:15 AM
The key in cancer misdiagnosis revolves around two central issues. First, the misdiagnosis of breast cancer is common where thousands of women are yearly misdiagnosed. Secondly, pathology errors happen and rarely do physicians or patients get second opinions on pathology, especially when a benign diagnosis is given. I recently wrote a book about both of these types of errors which hopefully will help women get diagnosed properly so they can receive the correct treatments as soon as possible.
Believe51
03-17-2009, 12:46 PM
Robin I love the new picture, it makes me smile. Sending you a giant hug!>>Believe51
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.