PDA

View Full Version : BRAIN METS & Chemo as treatment information...


pattyz
10-19-2005, 07:12 AM
Because of Eric's post on iMRT I "ran into" information on proton beam therapy (got excited briefly) ......... and then 'stumbled onto' this old info dated: 1999

I guess it's all in where you focus your attention/research. This came as a surprize to me. Here it is:

<<Although, the results of chemotherapy for brain metastases have generally been disappointing, a number of uncontrolled studies have demonstrated favorable response rates of brain metastases from chemosensitive tumors such as breast cancer, small-cell lung cancer, and germ cell tumors.[1,114]

Brain Metastases From Breast Cancer—

Patients with metastatic breast cancer have been treated with chemotherapy since 1970. In the largest series to date, Rosner et al[116] treated 100 consecutive breast cancer patients with brain metastases with several chemotherapy regimens, including CFP (cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and prednisone) and CFPMV (CFP, methotrexate, and vincristine). Of note, these patients had not received prior chemotherapy for their systemic disease.

Overall, 50% of patients had an objective response (10% had a complete response and 40%, a partial response). In addition, disease stabilized in 9% of patients. The median duration of remission was 10 months for complete responders and 7 months for partial responders.

Rosner et al subsequently treated an additional 26 patients with progressive brain metastases from breast cancer with one of four chemotherapeutic regimens: (1) CFP, (2) CFPMV, (3) cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, or (4) mitomycin (Mutamycin) and vinblastine.[117] Objective responses were seen in 61% of patients, while another 15% had stable disease. The median survival for responders was 12 months, as compared with 2.4 months for nonresponders. Interestingly, prior systemic chemotherapy did not affect the response of the brain metastases, arguing against the concept of the brain as a pharmacologic sanctuary.

Boogerd et al[118] treated 20 patients with brain metastases from breast cancer with CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil) or CAF (cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, and fluorouracil). Seven patients had developed recurrent disease after whole-brain radiation.

Objective tumor regression occurred in 76% of patients after two cycles of chemotherapy. The median duration of neurologic remission was 30 weeks, and the median survival was 25 weeks. When the results of these chemotherapy patients were compared to 29 historical controls treated with whole-brain radiation, the neurologic response rate, duration of response, and median survival were better in the patients treated with chemotherapy.

Several other small series have reported responses to a variety of regimens, including cisplatin (Platinol) plus etoposide[119]; and the TPDC-FuHu regimen, which combines lomustine (CCNU [CeeNu]) with various drugs designed to improve its efficacy, including thioguanine, procarbazine (Matulane), dibromodulcitol, fluorouracil, and hydroxyurea (Hydrea). [120]>>

hugs,
pattyz

al from Canada
10-19-2005, 07:52 AM
Thanks Patty,

This is very interesting stuff. I wonder when the next wave of trial results with Efaproxyn and Lapatinib are coming?

Al

StephN
10-19-2005, 11:43 AM
Hi Patty -
Glad to see you back from your little trip and still seeming to feel better.

I would have imagined that you had run into the info that you posted sometime in the past. Reason being that you have resisted whole brain radiation so adamently, I assumed you had some evidence for that. This "old" info seems to give some support for your long-time stance.

When is your next check up??

Lolly
10-19-2005, 09:10 PM
Patty, it sure looks like you're on the right track. Somehow you knew what was best for your situation; I would guess that these results were also dependent on which ones in the trials were "responders", as you obviously are :)

<3,
Lolly

pattyz
10-20-2005, 06:25 AM
You're welcome!

And: what joyful news you shared on Linda's current scan results and response to tx's!!

hugs,
patty

pattyz
10-20-2005, 06:37 AM
Well........ don't know about THAT, Steph! Just never liked the up-to-date journal stats on WBR; combined with known sides. That was my 'evidence' at the time. I have to temper what I say about it as so many do have WBR, if you see what I mean??

I know, you'd a thunk I'd have seen this long ago, sheesh.

Our little trip: waking to six inches of snow changed our direction plans, yet all worked out for the best, as so often happens! Have NEW favorite places and crossed off a life list wish: heard (and saw) elk bugle!!

Yep, still feeling good. Good being an objective term! But, NO symptoms. And that IS truly good.

oops...I see doc on Nov 4, but don't have MRI scheduled yet...probably end of Nov.

hugsxoxopatty

pattyz
10-20-2005, 06:43 AM
Yes, indeedy!

...it does in part talk about non-responders. And, it is easy to see this is NOT the 'magic bullet' in terms of lengths of response and survival. Yet, I think VERY good news on response at all.

It makes me doubly encouraged. And hope it does for others as well.

xoxohugs,
patty

StephN
10-20-2005, 12:34 PM
Hey Patty -
You and Lisa will have to compare notes on tones and cadence of the Elk bugling during your respective vacations!
She seemed pretty excited by the anticipation of it where she was going!

We have lots of elk up here in the Misty Woods, but I always seem to be in a car when we see them. I just have to settle for the local Coyotes who announce their presence from time to time.

Keep up the "good work!"

mickey
10-20-2005, 01:30 PM
I would like to hear the "untempered version" of the WBR thoughts. I had WBR in May and as of yet have no side effects. Would like to know what you know in case something comes up.
Mickey

pattyz
10-20-2005, 04:17 PM
Hon, I am so glad you're doing good. LOTS of people do well after WBR. It was a personal choice for me, which I was in a way, lucky enough to be able to make.

It is the numbers that bother/d me most. Percents of response, length of response, length before progression. I felt I had just as good a shot going in a different direction.

hugs,
patty

mickey
10-20-2005, 04:59 PM
I would like to know all of those stats since I am not that far out from W BR and want to know if my chances are not good.
Mickey

pattyz
10-21-2005, 10:36 AM
I have spent hrs this morning thinking about this... and looking at my saved info along with googling numerous times...

I really feel ill equipped and ill at ease giving this kind of information. So much depends on the individual circumstance. That is reiterated over and over again on any of the reports.

Good performance status combined with controlled systemic mets along with age are among the top key items for better prognosis. It can make all the difference in the world.

That said, I will include just two accounts...but PLEASE go out and research your own personal perameters. I couldn't find the specific stats I was looking for.

Personally, I have outlived and 'out performed' nearly all prognosis I have read. So there, I say!
hugsxoxopatty

Treatment of Brain Metastases
Standard Radiotherapy

The median survival of patients with brain metastases receiving supportive care and corticosteroids is less than two months. The addition of fractionated whole brain radiotherapy doubles this endpoint to four months. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is generally painless and well-tolerated, although it produces fatigue and temporary alopecia. Different dose-fractionation schemes have not yielded superior results, and 10 treatments of 300 centigray each over two weeks is a common, convenient schedule.

Fifty to 70% of patients improve symptomatically with WBRT, though most patients do not achieve a radiographic complete response and 40% still die from intracranial tumor.

Age < 60, good performance status, having no extracranial sites of metastasis, and having a resected or locally controlled primary tumor site are all beneficial prognostic factors; patients with all four factors live a median of 7 months.

_______________________________________

Conferences > OncoLink Scientific Meetings Coverage > OncoLink at ASTRO 2001 > OncoLink at ASTRO 2001: Wednesday, November 7
Results of Whole Brain Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases
Diana Stripp, MD
University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
Posting Date: November 7, 2001
Presenter: A.S. Mahmoud-ahmed
Presenter's Affiliation: Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
Type of Session: Scientific
Background


Brain metastasis is the most common neurologic complication experienced breast cancer patients.
Whole brain irradiation is a known method of palliation for these lesions.
Some previous studies have shown improved survival for patients treated with stereotatic radiotherapy in addition to WBRT.
Materials and Methods


Retrospective review of 116 pts with breast cancer who were treated with WBRT, 2/84- 9/00.
Evaluation of the significance of age, stage of the primary, control of the primary, presence of other systemic metastases, site of systemic metastases, KPS, RPA class, total dose of WBRT and number of the brain metastases in predicting the survival after WBRT in these patients.
60 patients had follow up scans after WBRT.
Results


The median survival was 4.2 months.
The 1-year survival rate was 17% and the 2-year survival was only 2%.

Local control was 50%.

Multivariate analysis showed that only KPS, RPA and whether WBRT was given are the significant prognostic factors.
Author's Conclusions


Overall survival in breast cancer patients with brain metastases treated with WBRT was poor.

Only predictors of longer survival in this study were KPS, RPA class and higher radiation dose
Clinical/Scientific Implications


In selected population of patients, addition of SRS boost to WBRT appears to be a feasible palliative measures in pts with breast cancer with brain metastases.
Prospective studies have not shown a benefit to SRS in patients with multiple brain mets.
Further evaluation is needed specifically in patients with a single brain met, particularly in those patients with breast cancer which has such a long natural history compared to other cancers.

Annemarie
10-21-2005, 09:18 PM
Hi,
I totally understand Patty and her decision that works best for her. I have felt this way many times during my 5 1/2 year battle with bc and brain mets. I have had a primary breast tumor and mets to the brain only. I was diagnosed at 32. I did A/C and T in 2000. My hair grew back and then I got a 3cm brain met in the back of my head. So the doctor told me I needed WBR and my hair would probably grow back in patches. Well that is all I needed to hear (however silly that may seem). So I had a craniotomy and partial brain radiation. A year later the brain mets (tiny 7mm) came back to the top of my head (the area that was not treated). Then I had the upper part of my head treated. I do regret not following my doctors recommendations. My reasons were mostly vanity vs. clinical information. This is a personal decision and not one that is right or wrong.