HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > Articles of Interest
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-16-2007, 10:02 AM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
for Jean who is looking for comparison studies of AIS

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Mar 13; [Epub ahead of print]
Relative potencies of anastrozole and letrozole to suppress estradiol in breast cancer patients undergoing ovarian stimulation before in vitro fertilization.

Azim AA,
Costantini-Ferrando M,
Lostritto K,
Oktay K.
Fertility Preservation Program, Center for Reproductive Medicine & Infertility, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York.
Context: Breast cancer patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for embryo or oocyte cryopreservation should be induced by the method that leads to least increase in estradiol levels. Objective: To determine the potency of anastrozole to suppress serum estradiol levels in breast cancer patients undergoing COH. Design: Prospective sequential cohort study between May 2003 and November 2005 for letrozole, and December 2005 and April 2006 for anastrozole. Setting: Academic center for reproductive medicine. Patients: Breast cancer patients presenting for fertility preservation Intervention: COH using FSH and letrozole (n=47) or anastrozole (n=7), followed by oocyte retrieval and embryo cryopreservation. Main outcome measures: Serum estradiol levels, area under the curve (AUC) for estradiol, and outcomes of COH cycles. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding length of stimulation, total gonadotropin dose, number of follicles >17mm and the lead follicle size on hCG day and number of embryos cryopreserved. The mean E2 on the day of hCG and post-hCG days were higher in the anastrozole group compared to the letrozole group (1325.89+/-833.17 and 2515.07+/-1368.52 vs. 427.78+/-278.24 and 714.38+/-440.83 pg.d/mL, p PMID: 17356042 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2007, 06:16 PM   #2
Jean
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,154
Thanks Lani,

Regards,
Jean
__________________
Stage 1, Grade 1, 3/30/05
Lumpectomy 4/15/05 - 6MM IDC
Node Neg. (Sentinel node)
ER+ 90% / PR-, Her2+++ by FISH
Ki-67 40%
Arimidex 5/05
Radiation 32 trt, 5/30/05
Oncotype DX test 4/17/06, 31% high risk
TOPO 11 neg. 4/06
Stopped Arimidex 5/06
TCH 5/06, 6 treatments
Herceptin 5/06 - for 1 yr.
9/06 Completed chemo
Started Femara Sept. 2006
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter