HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-13-2004, 09:29 PM   #1
Sandy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Its my understanding this applies to a better response to Herceptin only. However, it wasn't true with me. Herceptin didn't do much, except perhaps I went longer without a recurrence, because I had a recurrence while on it. Its my understanding its not a cure it gives us more survivial time if it works. The IBC Dx. is quite different from rest of the BC's. Hugs, Sandy
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2004, 09:52 PM   #2
Sheila
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am also a 3+....on Herceptin and hoping it continues to work.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 02:13 AM   #3
pam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Sandy -- I don't know my her2+ number, but do know it's high. Is there a 5? I also have ibc. Is herceptin less effective with ibc? I was 1st dx 6/01. Have been fighting bone mets since 9/02. And this week now starting a new treatment, navelbine & herceptin. I'm very scared.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 02:42 AM   #4
Linda in TX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mine was also +3 and I am responding wonderfully to taxotere/herceptin after recurrence in August of last year.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 02:52 AM   #5
eleanor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am also 3+ positive
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 03:03 AM   #6
Linda in MI.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm a 3+, grade 3 tumor.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 03:07 AM   #7
Lisa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
+3 here. So far responding well to Navelbine/Herceptin.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 03:16 AM   #8
Priscilla
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
3+, ER/PR-, Grade 3,
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 03:20 AM   #9
Bevie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
HER2 2+ then retested with FISH report says HER2+ no numbers, but I believe weakly positive.
I'm 3 years without recurrence.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 05:00 AM   #10
jojo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hey everyone,

Wouldn't this be an interesting thread...

What is your her+ level?

Mine is at 3+, according to my pathology report.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 05:05 AM   #11
JaneP
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'm a plus 3 as well.

Jane
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 05:12 AM   #12
Steph N.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Also overexpressed +3.
Very high grade primary tumor as well.
As an aside - I read recently that those with +3 have a better response rate to some of the treatments. Was so in my case. Interesting, and I do not know why. Must ask my oncologist when I see him tomorrow.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 06:26 AM   #13
Ann W
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am also 3+ It seems that almost everyone responding to this thread has the same number!! Dx October 2002 - so far, so good.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 06:34 AM   #14
Ronda
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I also am 3+, er/pr - last chemo was dec. o2, last herceptin was sept. 03. have pain in bones, scan was neg. in Dec. but tumor markers were slightly elevated. will go back to onc in March.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 06:47 AM   #15
susan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Ditto. It's my understanding that in order to receive Herceptin you must be 3+.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 07:09 AM   #16
Leslie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
DX Novermber 2001
Her2 2+ retested by FISH - negative
Grade 3
ER-

Not taking Herceptin
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 07:10 AM   #17
Linda in Calif
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
HER2 level 3+++, ER/PR+, Stage IIIA, NED for the last year...keeping fingers crossed because I haven't been able to get Herceptin for the last 11 months.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 09:47 AM   #18
Sandy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am a 3+ but ER/PR negative and its better to be positive then you have tomoxafin. Negative leaves only Herceptin and if that doesn't work its keep trying different chemos. Hope this answers your question if not try me again! Hugs, Sandy
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 10:09 AM   #19
Trudy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I was diagnosed in Aug. 2001, her2+ level 3
Had Herceptin for one year as part of a
Clinical Trial. Taking Femara now.
So far no recurrance, doing very well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2004, 11:32 AM   #20
Lolly
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am at "strongly 3+", er/pr-. I wonder which test was used to determine each one's status, FISH or IHC?
I've talked to the lab which did my test and the tech I spoke with couldn't find the info for me but we surmised mine was tested using IHC, as this was back in '99 and FISH wasn't in standard use then. However, the tissue bank where my tissue is stored holds it for 20 years so I can arrange to have it tested again if necessary. I may have it done as a precaution to save time should I ever want to enter a trial, as all the trials I read about specify FISH.
Lolly
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter