HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-18-2009, 10:56 AM   #1
Rich66
Senior Member
 
Rich66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South East Wisconsin
Posts: 3,431
Research funding sources?

Hey folks,
Remember this:
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/113261.php

I have word from a LIFT research contact and have been told the project is on hold indefinitely since it was thought unreasonable to ask patients to pay for the expensive process used in the trial.
!
Firstly, I didn't think patients payed to be in trials.

Secondly, isn't this kind of thing why there are all these products cashing in on being pink?

Thirdly, isn't that what organizations like ACS, Komen etc are supposed to be doing with their money from all the fundraising events? How about world health organization, aka WHO. (more like Where?)

Fourthly, see 1 through 3.

Ok..maybe I'm just terribly naive and a bit upset.

Does anyone here have insights into research funding? Any constructive thoughts on how to help get LIFT back on the rails? I am a video producer when not glued to pubmed. Maybe a youtube viral campaign is in order.
Unless...maybe the research isn't as promising as it seems and that's why they can't attract funding?
Rich66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 01:48 PM   #2
Rich66
Senior Member
 
Rich66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South East Wisconsin
Posts: 3,431
Interesting...hope something comes of this. Not sure why LIFT isn't getting some of this:


Getting closer to controlling cancer

By Robert Weiner, Patricia Berg, and Paulette Garthoff
Posted: 04/18/2009 12:30:00 AM MDT


The stimulus legislation signed by President Obama has generated a sense of excitement and opportunity among the 17,000 scientists who will gather in Denver during April 18-22 for the 100th annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR).
Cancer still killed 565,000 Americans last year — 18,358 developed cancer in Colorado, and 6,395 died, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Medical investigators have welcomed the increase in the NIH (National Institutes of Health) budget to $40 billion from $30 billion, including $8.2 billion for research. Advances against all diseases will benefit.
Cancer researchers have enthusiastically supported President Obama's strong backing for science and cancer research - "seeking a cure for cancer in our time," as he told Congress in February.
A major portion of the new money - $1.2 billion - will go to NIH's National Cancer Institute for its research as well as for outside grant distribution.
While most of the outreach funds will be directed to large, traditional grantees, a small portion ($100-200 million) will go to "challenge" grants for basic innovative research, often conducted at small laboratories.
That is where the excitement begins to unravel a bit, because less than 10 percent of grant applications for small laboratories making novel discoveries are expected to be approved.
From discovering genes activated in breast and prostate cancer, to finding drugs to suppress cancers, to creating new diagnostic tools to locate and prevent the spread of the disease, the basic scientist's mission is a major part of the progress that has reduced cancer mortality rates significantly between 1990 and 2004, avoiding more than a half million deaths.
The word "cancer," in fact, is misunderstood - it encompasses more than 200 diseases, explains Dr. Margaret Foti, AACR's CEO.
Although the death rate has declined two percent a year since 1999, 1,500 Americans a day still die from the disease. Cancer is the nation's number-two killer behind heart disease.
Dr. Foti says that "institutions all over the country are having emergency meetings" on how to apply for a share of the stimulus money and "maximize the opportunity" this moment creates.
Foti, who has spent 27 years running the country's primary cancer research scientists' organization, presses the point that cancer investigators are "right at the threshold of major discoveries" and "basic scientific knowledge is waiting" to be uncovered.
She notes the interlocking relationships among cancers—what she calls "a cascade of genes." Breakthroughs for one will pay off for others. For example, she says that researchers are poised "to extrapolate breast and ovarian cancer findings to other cancers."
The under 10% NCI funding of requested research projects is down from 25 percent a decade ago - and because of new applications the stimulus will not change that.
NIH has seen its budget go down in real terms every year for the past seven, a 14 percent decline. Stimulus money provides a useful two-year increase - and NIH insiders are concerned about what happens after that. Research must not end in two years.
Researchers must be as creative in their funding requests as in their quest for disease cures. If the recent formula holds, grants will still be almost impossible to get. It is necessary for large organizations to receive new funding. The smaller players must also mobilize their work.
Dr. Foti asserts that funds are needed to "keep the lab research engine going, ensure new drugs to get into the clinical-trials pipeline, and support the development of molecular therapies."
There is no substitute for the Federal research catalyst. Mark Hurlbert, the Avon Foundation's senior adviser for grants and partnerships, has noted that for breast cancer alone, $600 million annually has come from NCI before the Stimulus and the Department of Defense has provided $2.2 billion total since 1992, versus Komen $900 million since 1988, Avon $520 million since 1992, Revlon $110 million since 1992.
President Obama has declared April "Cancer Control Month." With the proper mix of funding for institutions large and small and with a commitment to multi-year research, we will be closer to controlling cancer.
Robert Weiner is former White House National Drug Policy public affairs director, and former chief of staff of the U.S. House Aging Committee and Health Subcommittee.
Patricia Berg is director of a breast cancer laboratory at George Washington University Medical Center's Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Professor of Molecular Biology.
Paulette Garthoff is a former government analyst who has a family member who is a breast cancer survivor.
Rich66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 01:39 PM   #3
Shobha
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bayarea,CA
Posts: 679
Rich,

Thanks for following up this one.

Is there anything we can do to shed some spot light on this specific trial? Sounding as promising as it does, I too am surprised it is not getting the funding. I remember that this did draw a lot of attention when it was first announced.
__________________
DX: 06-30-2007 - left breast -stage IIIB, Her2/Neu 3+++, ER weakly positive, PR-
Taxol+herceptin weekly for 3 months
FEC+herceptin every 3 weeks for 3 months
BRCA 1 and 2 - Negative
Jan 2008 - Bilateral mastectomy, prophylactic Rt. side.
Radiation for 5 weeks
Completed my yr of herceptin on 07-14-2008
Brain MRI - 3/2/09 Clean
Shobha is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter