HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > Articles of Interest
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-10-2008, 10:08 PM   #1
Rich66
Senior Member
 
Rich66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South East Wisconsin
Posts: 3,431
Bsi-201

PRESS RELEASE
BiPar Sciences Receives 2008 Emerging Technology Award in Biotechnology





Last update: 9:30 a.m. EST Dec. 10, 2008


BRISBANE, Calif., Dec 10, 2008 (GlobeNewswire via COMTEX) -- BiPar Sciences, Inc., a privately held biopharmaceutical company developing PARP inhibitors as novel cancer therapies, has received the 2008 Emerging Technology Award for Biotechnology from the Silicon Valley/San Jose Business Journal. BiPar was selected as the first place winner in the biotechnology category for the company's pioneering work with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, a targeted therapeutic approach to treating triple negative breast and other solid tumor cancers by preventing cancer cells from repairing their own damaged DNA.
"We are honored to receive the 2008 Emerging Technology Award in Biotechnology," said Hoyoung Huh, M.D., Ph.D., president and chief executive officer of BiPar Sciences. "At BiPar, we are focused on developing novel PARP inhibitors to treat patients with the most difficult-to-treat cancers. We are thrilled that our innovative work in DNA-repair technology continues to be recognized as an important new therapeutic modality in cancer."
The award was presented to BiPar during a December 4 event held by the Silicon Valley/San Jose Business Journal at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California. The Silicon Valley/San Jose Business Journal established the annual "Emerging Technology" awards to recognize the innovations and significant accomplishments of technology-oriented companies in Silicon Valley. The awards honor companies in 13 categories that are making valuable progress in the advancement of current technologies or are on the cutting edge in pursuing new and emerging technologies. Profiles of the award winners and finalists were included in the December 5 issue of the Silicon Valley/San Jose Business Journal.
About BiPar Sciences and BSI-201
BiPar Sciences, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing and commercializing a novel class of tumor-selective drugs designed to address unmet needs of cancer patients. The company's lead product candidate is BSI-201, which is in Phase 2 testing for triple negative breast cancer, ovarian cancer and other malignancies. BSI-201 is a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, a targeted approach to treating solid tumors by preventing cancer cells from repairing damaged DNA, ultimately causing the cancer cells to die. The company is also conducting preclinical studies on two additional compounds, BSI-401 (PARP inhibitor) and BSI-302 (anti-tubulin program). BiPar Sciences is privately held with headquarters in Brisbane, California. For more information, please visit www.biparsciences.com.
__________________

Mom's treatment history (link)
Rich66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2008, 05:39 AM   #2
Christine MH-UK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 414
More on this

BiPar Sciences Presents Interim Phase 2 Results for PARP Inhibitor BSI-201 At San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium

Results Demonstrate Continued Safety of Cancer Drug BSI-201 for Patients Enrolled in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Trial



Last update: 8:05 a.m. EST Dec. 12, 2008

BRISBANE, Calif., Dec 12, 2008 (GlobeNewswire via COMTEX) -- BiPar Sciences, Inc., a privately held biopharmaceutical company developing poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors as novel cancer therapies, today announced positive interim safety data from an ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial of the company's PARP inhibitor, BSI-201, in combination with chemotherapy in patients with triple negative metastatic breast cancer (TNBC). The company also presented gene expression data that confirmed significant upregulation of PARP in the tumors of the first 50 patients enrolled in the Phase 2 trial. Results were presented in a poster at the 2008 annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) in San Antonio, Texas.
"We are very encouraged by the results of BSI-201 to date," said Hoyoung Huh, M.D., Ph.D., president and chief executive officer of BiPar Sciences. "Our PARP inhibitor appears to be well tolerated, and our findings show that PARP is an important target in solid tumors including TNBC. We look forward to reporting Phase 2 efficacy data for this trial in mid-2009."
The poster titled "Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase 2, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Randomized Trial of Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (G/C) With or Without BSI-201, a PARP Inhibitor" was presented during the SABCS's second poster session on Friday, December 12, 2008. The poster illustrated data from the Phase 2 trial of BSI-201 in metastatic breast cancer patients whose tumors were negative for three common breast cancer markers: estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2. The trial participants were randomized into two different trial arms; one group who received chemotherapy (G/C) alone and one group who had BSI-201 added to their G/C regimen. The 89 clinical trial subjects (out of a targeted 120 patients) were treated for up to 12 cycles of therapy. The frequency and nature of reported adverse events did not differ between the two trial arms, and no added toxicities were attributable to BSI-201. In addition, gene expression profiling from the first 50 patients enrolled confirmed that the patients' tumors had significant upregulation of PARP, compared with normal breast tissue, supporting the targeting of this enzyme with BSI-201.
"TNBC is a very difficult-to-treat cancer subtype that is particularly aggressive and more likely to recur than other types of breast cancer," said Barry Sherman, M.D., executive vice president of development, at BiPar Sciences. "TNBC comprises 15 to 20 percent of all breast cancers and disproportionately affects younger and African-American women. TNBC currently does not have an approved standard treatment regimen and represents a significant unmet medical need. Our goal is to complete the BSI-201 Phase 2 trial as quickly as possible and move forward with the development of this promising compound."
About SABCS
The CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium is the largest annual symposium in the world devoted to breast cancer research and physician education. The symposium provides an important venue for cancer experts to review the latest information on experimental biology, etiology, prevention, diagnosis and therapy of breast cancer and premalignant disease. This year's program includes lectures and mini-symposia by experts in clinical and basic research. More than 1,000 slide and poster presentations were selected from submitted abstracts and case discussions.
About BiPar Sciences and BSI-201
BiPar Sciences, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing and commercializing a novel class of tumor-selective drugs designed to address unmet needs of cancer patients. The company's lead product candidate is BSI-201, which is in Phase 2 testing for triple negative breast cancer, ovarian cancer and other malignancies. BSI-201 is a PARP inhibitor and represents a targeted approach to treating solid tumors. Studies have shown that these inhibitors prevent cancer cells from repairing damaged DNA, ultimately causing them to die. The company is also conducting preclinical studies on two additional compounds, BSI-401 (PARP inhibitor) and BSI-302 (anti-tubulin program). BiPar Sciences is privately held with headquarters in Brisbane, California. For more information, please visit www.biparsciences.com.
About Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)
When patients are diagnosed with breast cancer, their tumors are routinely tested for and classified based on the presence of estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors. Commonly used breast cancer therapies, such as tamoxifen and Herceptin(r), target these receptors. However, up to 20 percent of all breast cancers are negative for all three receptors, thus giving rise to the term "triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)."
TNBC is a difficult-to-treat cancer subtype that does not have an approved standard-of-care and does not respond to current hormone-based and targeted therapies. TNBC is a very aggressive cancer, with higher rates of metastases and poorer survival rates than other breast cancer subtypes. The prevalence of the TNBC subtype is higher in younger and African-American women.
Christine MH-UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2008, 06:10 AM   #3
Christine MH-UK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 414
And the English translation

A triple-negative friend of mine, who is running out of options and considering a PARP inhibitor trial, found the press release to be very confusing, so I am going to provide an explanation of what I think it says. In a nut shell: Significant PARP upregulation seems to be a common, naturally occurring trait of the triple negative cancers, judging from tests we performed on the tumor samples from 50 patients. Our PARP inhibitor seemed not to produce significant added side effects when added to chemo.


The confusing bit for my friend was upregulation and I don't think it is the effect of all the chemo she has had. The writing is pretty turgid. Upregulation is mentioned twice: "The company also presented gene expression data that confirmed significant upregulation of PARP in the tumors of the first 50 patients enrolled in the Phase 2 trial" and "In addition, gene expression profiling from the first 50 patients enrolled confirmed that the patients' tumors had significant upregulation of PARP, compared with normal breast tissue, supporting the targeting of this enzyme with BSI-201."

I think that the press release must mean that PARP upregulation turned out to be a naturally occurring commonality among the triple negative cancers among the women on the trial prior to treatment, not that upregulation was connected with being on the trial. After all, a drug designed as a PARP inhibitor that turned out to be a PARP upregulator would not be a good thing at all and the trial would presumably stop.

However, I must admit that I did find the language to be unclear. If anyone knows more about this, advice would be appreciated.
Christine MH-UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2008, 11:28 AM   #4
Rich66
Senior Member
 
Rich66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South East Wisconsin
Posts: 3,431
Hmmm...the truly unclear issue seems to be whether it is showing benefit. Great to hear it isn't adding toxity..but you could say that about water So far everything seems to suggest it is a new target, modality etc. Hopefully that translates into results.
__________________

Mom's treatment history (link)
Rich66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter