HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-27-2009, 08:56 PM   #1
DianneS
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 327
Alred Score

Ahhh....yet another question! I am told that on the Alred Score (do they do these in the States? I had not heard of it and may be mispelling it) I am a 4, which means I would significantly benefit from hormone therapy. My new onc said that I don't have a lot of estrogen receptors - I am weakly positive - but those I do have lit up strongly. Is this weird or what?

This may help some of you out there who are in this minority group of weakly ER positive women, who are trying to decide if hormone therapy would benefit them or not.

Please let me know if you have heard of this Alred Score. I'm in Canada so maybe it's just done here.

Diannes
One year 'anniversary' today!!!! NED......
__________________
Three years and 5 months NED
Dx: Aug 2008 right breast IDC with 50% of tumor DCIS, Stage II or IIA, tumor size: 2.1 cm
Grade 3
8/9 Richardson/Bloom test
ER+ weakly positive
Alred Score: 4 (suggesting I would strongly benefit from hormone therapy)
PR-,
HER2 positive +++
No vascular invasion
No lymph nodes involved
Surgery: Sept. 9, 2008 -Modified radical mastectomy, right breast. I chose to have a simple mastectomy on the left. Began Taxotere/Carboplatin/Herceptin November, 2008. Finished T/C March 2009. Finished #16 Herceptin Sept. 09. AI's and Tamoxifen made me sick. Began natural Tamoxifen which is Quercetin, I3C and a combo of other supplements. I am also a DES Daughter. There is now a link between DES exposure in utero and breast cancer!
DianneS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 07:19 AM   #2
Hopeful
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,380
Re: Alred Score

DianneS,

The name of the test is the Allred, not Alred score, so the misspelling may have hindered your research. It is named for the Dr. who invented it, Craig Allred. One of the under the radar issues in breast cancer treatment is the lack of consistency in ER testing and interpretation. A similar issue with regard to Her2+ testing a few years ago had a much higher profile. Most of the ER testing done today is by immunohistochemical testing (IHC), which tells you the percentage of cells in the tumor that are positive for ER. Dr. Allred's method looks not just at the number of cells staining positively for ER, but to the intensity of the staining, and uses both in a formula to arrive at a single score. The issue is that labs will use a cut-off point (again, there is no consistency for where that is) to classify a tumor as "ER-". So, a tumor with 5% or 10% ER+ cells can be classified as "ER-," and the patient not be offered hormonal therapy. Dr. Allred's point is that patients with a low number of ER+ cells that stain deeply (indicating they are highly responsive to hormonal therapy) may be misclassified if only IHC testing is used.

Here are a few links to articles you can read about it:

http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/full/23/22/5148#R11

http://www.breastcancerupdate.com/sa...o/2004/sa2.pdf

I wish I lived in an area where Allred testing was standard. You are very fortunate. Congratulations on your one year anniversary.

Hopeful
Hopeful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2009, 07:42 AM   #3
Debbie L.
Senior Member
 
Debbie L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 463
Re: Alred Score

Another reason to send your slides and tumor blocks out for a second opinion. I sent mine to Baylor (really simple), where they use the Allred score.

I think Dr. Allred was at Baylor then, although he's now somewhere in the midwest - Washington University maybe.

When I did this, there was a lot of information on the Baylor website, and a form to download and fill out to enclose. But they've completely changed their website and all I can find is a contact link (email) for setting up a second opinion pathology consult:

http://www.bcm.edu/pathology/patients/service.htm

Debbie Laxague
__________________
3/01 ~ Age 49. Occult primary announced by large (6cm) axillary node, found by my husband.
4/01 ~ Bilateral mastectomies (LMRM, R elective simple) - 1.2cm IDC was found at pathology. 5 of 11 axillary nodes positive, largest = 6cm. Stage IIIA
ERPR 5%/1% (re-done later at Baylor, both negative at zero).
HER2neu positive by IHC and FISH (8.89).
Lymphovascular invasion, grade 3, 8/9 modified SBR.
TX: Control of arm of NSABP's B-31 adjuvant Herceptin trial (no Herceptin, inducing a severe case of Herceptin-envy): A/C x 4 and Taxol x 4 q3weeks, then rads. Raging infection of entire chest after small revision of mastectomy scar after completing tx (significance unknown). Arimidex for two years, stopped after second pathology opinion.
2017: Mild and manageable lymphedema and some cognitive issues.
Debbie L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter