HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-18-2014, 07:47 AM   #21
AlaskaAngel
Senior Member
 
AlaskaAngel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,018
Re: Ding-Dong! the anthracyclines are dead! SABCS presentation by Dr Slamon shows ant

Here's some general info on timing of onset treatment-induced leukemias. The second one (done only in regard to tAML) doesn't talk about timing of onset, but indicates that there have been a lack of studies done to track the topic during the years of changes in therapies.:

1999 article:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10586109

"There are two distinctive types of treatment-induced leukemia: those secondary after alkylating agents and those secondary after topoisomerase-II- inhibitors. These two types of leukemia after regarding their clinical and their hematological characteristics, but also regarding their prognosis and their associated molecular abnormalities. Leukemias induced by alkylating agents occur generally 5 or 6 years after the beginning of the chemotherapy and are preceded by a more or less long phase of pancytopenia or myelodysplasia and according to their cytologic aspects are difficult to be classified within FAB classification. Their prognosis is pejorative. The most commonly found cytogenetic abnormalities associated with these types of induced leukemia are losses or deletions of chromosomes 5 and 7. Leukemias induced by topoisomerase-II-inhibitors occur shortly after the treatment (12 to 30 months), they begin generally suddenly without preleukemia prodom and their more frequent cytological aspects are M4 and M5 type. The prognosis is less severe than alkylating agent related forms with higher response rates and is dependant of discovered cytogenetic abnormalities."

2013 article on AML:
http://www.hematology.org/News/2013/9875.aspx

“In the course of improving interventions and survival rates in many types of cancer, we have learned that certain chemotherapies can cause damage to cells in the bone marrow, increasing a patient’s risk of leukemia. However, no recent large-scale studies have evaluated how the risk of treatment-related leukemia has evolved with the changing treatment strategies,” said Lindsay Morton, PhD, of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and lead author of the study.
To examine how the risk of tAML has evolved over time among cancer patients treated with chemotherapy, Dr. Morton and a team of researchers at the NCI’s Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics evaluated data from cancer registries in the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, identifying adult patients ages 20-84 who were diagnosed with cancer (any type) between 1975 and 2008 and who were treated with chemotherapy. SEER data files were reviewed to determine tAML risk based on first type of cancer, time since diagnosis, age at diagnosis, and year of diagnosis."
__________________
Dx 2002 age 51
bc for granny, aunt, cousin, sister, mother.
ER+/PR+/HER2+++, grade 3
IDC 1.9 cm, some DCIS, Stage 1, Grade 3
Lumpectomy, CAFx6 (no blood boosters), IMRT rads, 1 3/4 yr tamoxifen
Rads necrosis
BRCA 1 & 2 negative
Trials: Early detection OVCA; 2004 low-dose testosterone for bc survivors
Diet: Primarily vegetarian organic; metformin (no diabetes), vitamin D3
Exercise: 7 days a week, 1 hr/day
No trastuzumab, no taxane, no AI
NED
AlaskaAngel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter