HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > Breast Cancer Meeting Highlights
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Breast Cancer Meeting Highlights News fro recent ASCO and San Antonio Meetings

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-18-2014, 02:16 PM   #1
'lizbeth
Senior Member
 
'lizbeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sunny San Diego
Posts: 2,214
Post Projecting the cost-effectiveness of pertuzumab with trastuzumab and docetaxel in the

Projecting the cost-effectiveness of pertuzumab with trastuzumab and docetaxel in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, locally advanced, inflammatory or early breast cancer.



Abstract No:
642
Attend this session at the
2014 ASCO Annual Meeting!


Session: Breast Cancer - HER2/ER
Type: General Poster Session
Time: Monday June 2, 8:00 AM to 11:45 AM
Location: S Hall A2
Personalize your Meeting experience with a suggested or customized itinerary!

Author(s): Joseph B. Babigumira, Eduardo Santos, Vincent Percival Antao, Bruce Wang, Chia C. Portera, Tripthi Kamath, Louis P Garrison; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA; Alliance Life Sciences, Somerset, NJ
Abstract Disclosures

Abstract:

Background: The NeoSphere trial (Gianni et al. [2012]) compared the following regimens for neoadjuvant treatment in HER2+, locally advanced, inflammatory or early breast cancer: 1) trastuzumab and docetaxel (TH) 2) pertuzumab, trastuzumab and docetaxel (THP), 3) pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (HP), and 4) pertuzumab plus docetaxel (TP). The pathological complete response (pCR) rates were 29.0% for TH, 45.8% for THP, 16.8% for HP, and 24.0% for TP. THP significantly increased the pCR rate. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of THP compared to other treatment regimens in the neoadjuvant setting based on the pCR results from NeoSphere. Methods: We constructed a combined decision-analytic (decision tree) and partitioned survival (area under the curve) model with three health states: disease-free (DF), progressive disease (PD), and death. The decision tree modeled the probability of pCR and the partitioned survival model projected life expectancy of patients who did or did not achieve pCR. Utility data for health states were assigned to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). We estimated the cost of early breast cancer systemic therapy, drug administration, drug monitoring, clinical management of adverse events, and progressive disease (PD). We performed univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results: See Table. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) comparing THP to TH were $34,700/LY and $38,500/QALY, THP to HP, $33,000/LY and $36,900/QALY, and THP to TP, $16,100/LY and $17,800/QALY. The ICERs (THP vs. TH) were most sensitive to pCR difference between THP and TH and the cost of pertuzumab. Conclusions: Pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab and docetaxel is projected to be cost-effective in the neoadjuvant setting. This study suggests that this regimen, in addition to being clinically effective, would be favorable from an economic standpoint in the U.S.
Summary of results.
Treatment
regimens
Lifetime
cost ($)
Life years
(LYs)
Quality-adjusted
life years (QALYs)
THP 143,000 18.41 16.51
TP 132,000 17.69 15.86
TH 124,000 17.85 16.01
HP 112,000 17.45 15.65
'lizbeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007
free webpage hit counter