HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > Clinical Trials
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-02-2006, 02:19 PM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
more from Istanbul--Breast cancer group award and start of new trial

Breast Cancer Research Group Wins ESMO Award, Plans New Trial

Zosia Chustecka

October 2, 2006 (Istanbul) — A collaboration of breast cancer researchers who were responsible for the landmark Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial showing the benefits of trastuzumab (Herceptin, Genentech) has won a new award from the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO).

The ESMO Lifetime Achievement Award in Targeted Therapies in Cancer Research and Treatment, worth €50,000 and supported by GlaxoSmithKline, was presented here at the society's 31st Congress. "This is the first time that such a significant award has been given," commented Aage Schultz, ESMO executive director.

The award was presented to the Breast International Group (BIG), cochaired by Martine Piccart, MD, from the Institute Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium, and Aaron Goldhirsch, MD, from the European Institute of Oncology in Milan, Italy. It recognizes their "outstanding commitment to breast cancer treatment and research over the past 10 years," said Paolo Paoletti, MD, senior vice president of the oncology medicine development center at GlaxoSmithKline. "Their coordinated and collaborative approach to breast cancer research will ultimately benefit women all over the world whose lives are touched by breast cancer."

Started in 1996, the BIG collaboration was formed to coordinate research efforts, Dr. Piccart explained. "At that time, breast cancer research was very fragmented, and there was a wasteful disposition of resources," she told journalists. "Since we began, 38 groups have joined in," she continued, "allowing us to conduct large clinical trials efficiently and rapidly."

The group's best-known achievement is the HERA trial, which was published in the New England Journal of Medicine last year. It involved more than 5000 women followed for 2.5 years and compared trastuzumab with observation in women with HER2-positive breast cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy. "In that very short period of time, we saw very striking results, with the risk of relapse being cut in half," she commented. "This was a very efficient way of bringing a new drug to patients," she added.

Which Cases Benefit From Chemotherapy?


The BIG collaboration is now working on another large study, Microarray for Node Negative Disease May Avoid Chemotherapy (MINDACT), which will involve 6000 women with node-negative breast cancer. "Although this is an early stage of breast cancer, nevertheless about 30% of these women will die, and we try to prevent this with chemotherapy," Dr. Piccart explained. "However, not all women benefit, and some women do very well with just surgery alone. We are convinced that too many women receive chemotherapy and needlessly suffer drug toxicity."

At present, the decision as to whether or not to administer chemotherapy postoperatively is made on the basis of classic clinical signs, such as tumor size, age of the patients, and presence of receptors, Dr. Piccart explained to Medscape. These signs suggest about one third of women are likely to benefit from chemotherapy.

"We are testing a new tool, known as the Amsterdam genetic signature, which comprises 70 genes, to see how it compares with the classic signs," she explained. All of the participants will have both tests. If both point to a high chance of benefit from chemotherapy, those patients will be treated, whereas if both tests suggest there will be no benefit, those women will not undergo chemotherapy.

"It is the women that fall in between the 2 that we want to focus on," Dr. Piccart said. "We suspect that the genetic signature will be a better predictor of benefit from chemotherapy than the classic signs, but of course we have to wait to see how the trial comes out," she commented. "The trial has only just begun; we will have to wait about 5 years for the answer."

N Eng J Med. 2005;353:1659-1672.
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2006, 02:50 PM   #2
Christine MH-UK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 414
Good for them!

I think everyone benefits from these big, well-designed, coordinated trials. It helps to make the best use of limited resources.

I do vaguely remember reading somewhere that some scientists had looked at her2 positive cancers and the 70 gene signature and found that her2 cancers overwhelmingly fell in the "needs chemo" category, so it may not change things so much for her2 positive patients. Still, anything that reduces the unnecessary use of chemo is good for patients.
Christine MH-UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter