HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-23-2006, 02:03 PM   #1
R.B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,843
Comparison different treatments AI or Tamoxifen ER+PR+ - ER+ PR- 15th May 06

RB


1: Cancer. 2006 May 15; [Epub ahead of print] Related Articles, Links
Click here to read
The impact of tumor progesterone receptor status on optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer: a decision analysis.

Punglia RS, Kuntz KM, Winer EP, Weeks JC, Burstein HJ.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

BACKGROUND: Emerging data suggest that treatment outcomes with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and/or tamoxifen may differ for tumors that express both the estrogen receptor (ER) and the progesterone receptor (PR) (ER+/PR+) compared with those that lack PR expression (ER+/PR-). However, the optimal sequencing of AIs and tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy is not known and may differ for biologic subsets of cancers. METHODS: Markov models were used to simulate disease-free survival (DFS) separately among postmenopausal women with ER+/PR+ cancers and women with ER+/PR- cancers. By using risk estimates reported from randomized clinical trials, treatment with 5 years of an AI alone with sequential treatment consisting of tamoxifen with crossover to an AI at 2 years was compared. RESULTS: For women with ER+/PR+ cancers, sequential therapy with tamoxifen followed by crossover to an AI at 2 years yielded modest improvements in 10-year DFS estimates compared with planned AI monotherapy (84.3% vs. 82.2% and 68.8% vs. 64.8% for lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive patients, respectively). However, for women with ER+/PR- cancers, upfront treatment with an AI yielded improved outcomes with 10-year DFS rates of 90.5% and 80.1% for the lymph node-negative and node-positive groups, respectively, compared with 88.2% and 76.1%, respectively, for sequential treatment with tamoxifen followed by an AI. CONCLUSIONS: Modeling estimates suggested that the optimal endocrine treatment strategy may differ based on the biologic features of breast cancer tumors. Patients with ER+/PR+ tumors achieved optimal 10-year DFS estimates with tamoxifen followed by a crossover to AI therapy, whereas patients with ER+/PR- tumors fared best when they initiated treatment with AI. Cancer 2006. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.

PMID: 16703595 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
R.B. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter