HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-18-2016, 08:53 AM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
Thumbs up dual her2 blockade w herceptin + Lapatinib shrinks tumors in 11 days(better report)

European Cancer Organisation

EBCC-10 NEWS: Combination of lapatinib and trastuzumab shrinks HER2 positive breast cancer significantly in 11 days after diagnosis
Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Approximately a quarter of women with HER2 positive breast cancer, who were treated with a combination of the targeted drugs lapatinib and trastuzumab before surgery and chemotherapy, saw their tumours shrink significantly or even disappear, according to results from a clinical trial.

Professor Nigel Bundred told the 10th European Breast Cancer Conference (EBCC-10) today (Thursday): “This has ground-breaking potential because it allows us to identify a group of patients who, within 11 days, have had their tumours disappear with anti-HER2 therapy alone and who potentially may not require subsequent chemotherapy. This offers the opportunity to tailor treatment for each individual woman.”

Prof Bundred, who is Professor of Surgical Oncology at The University of Manchester and the University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust (UK), was presenting results from the UK EPHOS-B multi-centre, clinical trial, in which 257 women with newly-diagnosed, operable, HER2 positive disease were recruited between November 2010 and September 2015.

The trial had two parts; in part one, 130 women were randomised to receive no pre-operative treatment (the control group), or trastuzumab (Herceptin ®) only, or lapatinib (Tyverb ®) only, for 11 days after diagnosis and before surgery. However, as evidence emerged from other trials of the efficacy of the combination of lapatinib and trastuzumab to treat HER2 positive breast cancer in other settings, the second part of the trial was amended so that, from August 2013, the next 127 women were randomised to the control group, or to receive trastuzumab only, or the combination treatment. For both parts of the trial, the women continued to receive standard of care treatment after surgery.

Samples of tumour tissue were taken from the first biopsy, which had been used to confirm the cancer diagnosis, and then again during surgery. The samples were analysed to see if there had been a drop in levels of the Ki67 protein, an indicator of cell proliferation, or a rise in apoptosis (programmed cell death) of 30% or more from the time of the first biopsy. In addition, investigators reviewed the pathology reports on the tissue taken during surgery, and the women were then categorised as either having pathological complete response (pCR) if no active cancer cells had been found, minimal residual disease (MRD) if the tumour was less than 5mm in diameter, or other.

Results from the second part of the trial, analysed in February 2016, showed that, in addition to observing a drop in Ki67, for women who received the combination treatment 11% had pCR and 17% had MRD. For those women randomised to receive only trastuzumab, 0% had pCR and 3% had MRD and no patients had either pCR or MRD in the control group.

The group of women who responded to the combination treatment included women who had presented with Stage 2 breast cancer (where it had spread to their lymph nodes).

Speaking at the EBCC-10 press conference, Professor Judith Bliss, lead researcher from The Institute of Cancer Research, London, which co-led the trial, said: “These results show that we can get an early indication of pathological response within 11 days, in the absence of chemotherapy, in these patients on combination treatment. Most previous trials have only looked at the pathological response after several months of treatment.

“Clearly these results need further confirmation, but I suspect the excitement from seeing the speed of disappearance of the tumours will mean that several trials will attempt to confirm these results.”

So far, EPHOS-B is the only trial that has investigated giving combination treatment alone, without chemotherapy, in the two weeks between diagnosis and routine surgery. “Other trials have looked at anti-HER2 therapy, with and without chemotherapy, including an assessment of the combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib, and have reported impressive response rates but these trials have only reported results after several months of therapy. Potentially, giving treatment while waiting for surgery can identify a group of patients whose disease is particularly sensitive to anti-HER2 therapy, which would allow individualisation of therapy in women with HER2 positive cancers,” said Prof Bundred.

Chair of EBCC-10, Professor Fatima Cardoso, who is Director of the Breast Unit at the Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal, said: “The results of this important trial confirm previous initial suggestions that most probably there are patients who can be treated with dualblockade (two anti-HER2 agents simultaneously) alone, without chemotherapy. This study proposes a simple way to identify those patients very early on, which could help spare them unnecessary chemotherapy. What is now indispensable is to confirm if these early responses translate into better or equal long-term survival.”

HER2 positive breast cancer is breast cancer that has a high number of receptors for the human epidermal growth factor (HER2) on the surfaces of the cancer cells. These receptors stimulate the cancer cells to divide and grow. HER2 positive breast cancers tend to grow more quickly than HER2 negative cancers but can be treated with targeted therapies such as trastuzumab and lapatinib.

Abstract no: 6 LBA. “Effects of perioperative lapatinib and trastuzumab, alone and in combination, in early HER2+ breast cancer – the UK EPHOS-B trial (CRUK/08/002)”, Thursday, Clinical science symposium: HER2 positive breast cancer, 16.00-17.30 hrs, Elicium. When obtaining outside comment, journalists are requested to ensure that their contacts are aware of the embargo on this release.

Note: The study was funded by Cancer Research UK and GlaxoSmithKline and co-sponsored by The Institute of Cancer Research and The University of Manchester / University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust. Lapatinib is now owned by Novartis. Page last modified: 4 March 2016

^^^^^^^^^^^

Abstract Search - EBCC10

Session title: HER 2 Positive Breast Cancer
Session type: Clinical Science Symposium
Track:
Abstract number: 6LBA
Abstract title:
LATE BREAKING ABSTRACT: Effects of perioperative lapatinib and trastuzumab, alone and in combination, in early HER2+ breast cancer - the UK EPHOS-B trial (CRUK/08/002)

N. Bundred (1), D. Cameron (2), A Armstrong(3), A Brunt(4), A Cramer(5), D Dodwell(6), A Evans(7), A Hanby(6), S Hartup(6), A Hong(8), K Horgan(6), I Khattak(9), J Morden(10), J Naik(11), S Narayan(12), J Ooi(13), A Shaaban(14), R Smith(12), M Webster-Smith(10), J Bliss(10)

(1)University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Academic department of surgery, Manchester, United Kingdom
(2)University of Edinburgh and NHS Lothian, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
(3)The Chrtistie NHS Foundation, Manchester, United Kingdom
(4) University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust and Keele University
Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
(5) The Christie Pathology Partnership, Manchester, United Kingdom
(6) Leeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
(7) Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, poole, United Kingdom
(8) Royal devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom
(9) Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, United Kingdom
(10) The Institute of Cancer Research, ICR -CTSU, Clinical Studies, London, United Kingdom
(11) Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHST, Wakefield, United Kingdom
(12) University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Cancer Clincial Trials, Stoke-on-Trent , United Kingdom
(13) Bolton NHS FT, Bolton, United Kingdom
(14) University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Background: Optimal management of HER2+ cancers remains unclear. The window between diagnosis and definitive surgery provides an opportunity to assess biological drug effects in a treatment naïve primary breast cancer (BC) population. EPHOS-B was designed to measure the effect of 10–12 days' pre-operative anti-HER2 therapy on proliferation and apoptosis in HER2+ BC patients.

Patients and Methods: EPHOS-B is a multicentre, 2-part randomised trial in patients with operable newly diagnosed HER2+ primary BC. In Part 1 patients were randomised (1:2:2) to no perioperative treatment (control), trastuzumab only (6 mg/kg on days 1 & 8 pre-surgery) or lapatinib only (1500 mg/day). Emerging evidence on the efficacy of combination anti-HER2 therapy led to amendment to Part 2 where patients were allocated to control, trastuzumab only (as above) or combination of lapatinib (1000 mg/day) and trastuzumab (1:1:2). Analyses of Part 1 and Part 2 are presented.

Primary endpoint is change in Ki67 and/or apoptosis. Response is defined as a drop in Ki67 of ≥30% or a rise in apoptosis of ≥30% from baseline.

Tissue samples were taken at diagnostic core biopsy and surgery and analysed centrally for Ki67, apoptosis (activated caspase 3) and PgR, by immunohistochemistry (IHC). As an exploratory analysis, patients with insufficient tumour at surgery were categorised using pathological reports obtained from centres, blinded to randomised treatment allocation as having either pathological complete response in the breast (pCR), minimal residual disease (MRD, defined as <5 mm invasive tumour), or other. Full central pathology review with analysis of samples for Ki67/apoptosis is due for completion end of February 2016.

Control (N = 51) Lapatinib (N = 51) Trastuzumab (N = 89) Combination (N = 66)
Part 1 N = 22 N = 51 N = 57 −
Tumour size (cm) at entry, median (IQR) 2.0 (1.3–2.5) 2.5 (1.3–3.0) 2 (1.5–3.3) −
Breast pCR 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (1.8%) −
MRD 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (1.8%) −
Part 2 N = 29 − N = 32 N = 66
Tumour size (cm) at entry, median (IQR) 1.8 (1.5–2.3) − 1.6 (1.3–2.7) 1.7 (1.2–2.7)
Breast pCR 0 (0%) − 0 (0%) 7 (10.6%)
MRD 0 (0%) − 1 (3.1%) 11 (16.7%)
(Please note: complete table to follow).

Results: 257 patients were recruited (130 in Part 1 and 127 in Part 2); all were HER2+ (91% IHC 3+ and 9% amplified by FISH, locally assessed). Median age was 52 years (IQR 48–62); 48% had tumours >2 cm and 51% were grade 3 on biopsy at entry. According to local assessment, 67% were ER+ and 40% PgR+.

Response by treatment group is shown in the table.

Conclusion: The early reduction or absence of invasive disease in approximately quarter of patients after only 11 days' preoperative combination HER2 therapy identifies cancers addicted to the HER2 pathway. Using preoperative antiHER2 therapy offers potential to personalise therapy for these patients. Further trials are required to determine which patients may need only antiHER2 combination therapy continued thus avoiding chemotherapy.

Conflict of interest: Other Substantive Relationships: J. Bliss, Educational grant received by ICR in relation to EPHOS-B Trial from GSK. Advisory boards: J. Naik for Astra Zeneca and Novartis and I provided some paid training for Roche employees.

:
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2016, 10:22 AM   #2
SoCalGal
Senior Member
 
SoCalGal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: LA LA Land
Posts: 1,607
Re: dual her2 blockade w herceptin + Lapatinib shrinks tumors in 11 days(better repo

I guess they finally did a clinical trial to "prove" that the Herceptin/Tykerb combo is effective. When I first joined this community, there were a bunch of us on Tykerb/Xeloda, then Tykerb/Herceptin and other recipes that our docs made up, or we requested. I recall sending an email to Joe Druthers and asking for a sub-group called "tykerb/herceptin" I was so naive back then!! 9 years ago, finding this site was the beginning of my education in self-advocacy (to the tenth power) and lessons on survival and thinking outside the box for novel treatment combos. I was sure I'd be dead in 24-30 months. And here I am 9 years later.
__________________
1996 cancer WTF?! 1.3 cm lumpectomy Er/Pr neg. Her2+ (20nodes NEGATIVE) did CMF + rads. NED.
2002 recurrence. Bilateral mastectomy w/TFL autologous recon. Then ACx2. Skin lymphatic rash. Taxotere w/Herceptin x4. Herceptin/Xeloda. Finally stops spreading.
2003 - Back to surgery, remove skin mets, and will have surgery one week later when pathology can confirm margins.
‘03 latisimus dorsi flap to remove skin mets. CLEAN MARGINS. Continue single agent Herceptin thru 4/04. NED.
‘04 '05 & 06 tiny recurrences - scar line. surgery to cut out. NED each time.
1/2006 Rads again, to scar line. NED.

3/07 Heartbreaking news - mets! lungs.sternum. Try Tykerb/Xeloda. Tykerb/Carbo/Gemzar. Switch Oncs.
12/07 Herceptin.Tykerb. Markers go stable.
2/8/08 gamma knife 13mm stupid brain met.
3/08 Herceptin/tykerb/avastin/zometa.
3/09 brain NED. Lungs STABLE.
4/09 attack sternum (10 daysPHOTONS.5 days ELECTRONS)
9/09 MARKERS normal!
3/10 PET/CT=manubrium intensely metabolically active but stable. NEDhead.
Wash out 5/10 for tdm1 but 6/10 CT STABLE, PET improving. Markers normal. Brain NED. Resume just Herceptin plus ZOMETA
Dec 2010 Brain NED, lungs/sternum stable. markers normal.
MAR 2011 stop Herceptin/allergy! Go back on Tykerb and switch to Xgeva.
May-Aug 2011 Tykerb Herceptin Xgeva.
Sept 2011 Tykerb, Herceptin, Zometa, Avastin.
April 2012 sketchy drug trial in NYC. 6 weeks later I’m NED!
OCT 2012 PET/CT shows a bunch of freakin’ progression. Back to LA and Herceptin.avastin.zometa.
12/20/12 add in PERJETA!
March 2013 – 5 YEARS POST continue HAPZ
APRIL 2013 - 6 yrs stage 4. "FAILED" PETscan on 4/2/13
May 2013: rePetted - improvement in lungs, left adrenal stable, right 6th rib inactive, (must be PERJETA avastin) sternum and L1 fruckin'worsen. Drop zometa. ADD Xgeva. Doc says get rads consultant for L1 and possible biopsy of L1. I say, no thanks, doc. Lets see what xgeva brings to the table first. It's summer.
June-August 2013HAPX Herceptin Avastin Perjeta xgeva.
Sept - now - on chemo hold for calming tummy we hope. Markers stable for 2 months.
Nov 2013 - Herceptin-Perjeta-Avastin-Xgeva (collageneous colitis, which explains tummy probs, added Entocort)
December '13 BRAIN MRI ned in da head.
Jan 2014: CONTINUING on HAPX…
FEB 2014 PetCT clinical “impression”: 1. newbie nodule - SUV 1.5 right apical nodule, mildly hypermetabolic “suggestive” of worsening neoplastic lesion. 2. moderate worsening of the sternum – SUV 5.6 from 3.8
3. increasing sclerosis & decreasing activity of L1 met “suggests” mild healing. (SUV 9.4 v 12.1 in May ‘13)
4. scattered lung nodules, up to 5mm in size = stable, no increased activity
5. other small scattered sclerotic lesions, one in right iliac and one in thoracic vertebral body similar in appearance to L1 without PET activity and not clearly pathologic
APRIL 2014 - 6 YRS POST GAMMA ZAP, 7 YRS MBC & 18 YEARS FROM ORIGINAL DX!
October 2014: hold avastin, continue HPX
Feb 2015 Cancer you lost. NEDHEAD 7 years post gamma zap miracle, 8 years ST4, +19 yrs original diagnosis.
Continue HPX. Adding back Avastin
Nov 2015 pet/ct is mixed result. L1 SUV is worse. Continue Herceptin/avastin/xgeva. Might revisit Perjeta for L1. Meantime going for rads consult for L1
December 2015 - brain stable. Continue Herceptin, Perjeta, Avastin and xgeva.
Jan 2016: 5 days, 20 grays, Rads to L1 and continue on HAPX. I’m trying to "save" TDM1 for next line. Hope the rads work to quiet L1. Sciatic pain extraordinaire :((
Markers drop post rads.
2/24/16 HAP plus X - markers are down
SCIATIC PAIN DEAL BREAKER.
3/23/16 Laminectomy w/coflex implant L4/5. NO MORE SCIATIC PAIN!!! Healing.
APRIL 2016 - 9 YRS MBC
July 2016 - continue HAP plus Xgeva.
DEC 2016 - PETCT: mets to sternum, lungs, L1 still about the same in size and PET activity. Markers not bad. Not making changes if I don't need to. Herceptin/Perjeta/Avastin/Xgeva
APRIL 2017 10 YEARS MBC
December 2017 - Progression - gonna switch it up
FEB 2018 - Kadcyla 3 cycles ---->progression :(
MAY30th - bronchoscopy, w/foundation1 - her2 enriched
Aug 27, 2018 - start clinical trial ZW25
JAN 2019 - ZW25 seems to be keeping me stable
APRIL 2019 - ONE DOZEN YEARS LIVING METASTATIC
MAY 2019 - progression back on herceptin add xeloda
JUNE 2019 - "6 mos average survival" LMD & CNS new single brain met - one zap during 5 days true beam SBRT to cord met
10/30/19 - stable brain and cord. progression lungs and bones. washing out. applying for ds8201a w nivolumab. hope they take me.
12/27/19 - begin ds8401a w nivolumab. after 2nd cycle nodes melt away. after 3rd cycle chest scan shows Improvement, brain MRI shows improvement, resolved areas & nothing new. switch to plain ENHERTU. after 4th cycle, PETscan shows mostly resolved or improved results. Markers near normal. I'm stunned but grateful.
10/26/20 - June 2021 Tucatinib/xeloda/herceptin - stable ish.
SoCalGal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter