HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > Breast Cancer News
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-14-2008, 04:47 PM   #1
News
Senior Member
 
News's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,960
Treatment info offered after breast surgery is too confusing: study

Experts say the traditional bar chart is too confusing for many patients.

More...
News is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2008, 11:27 PM   #2
gdpawel
Senior Member
 
gdpawel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,080
How Presentation of Recurrence Risk Influences Decision-Making

It's is all in the presentation. When no alternatives are presented, people will tend to seize what is available. When relative risk numbers that really do not relate to actual risk are given, it makes informed decision making even more difficult.

The method used to present information about chemotherapy influences treatment decisions. In deciding on endorsing chemotherapy, patients understand the information best when presented with data in the absolute survival benefit format, rather than those presented with data in the relative risk reduction information format. Absolute survival benefit is the most easily understood method of conveying the information regarding benefit of treatment.

Discussions between doctors and patients about the risks and benefits of chemotherapy need to be changed. Being told that chemotherapy reduces your risk by 30% of recurrence can be misleading and meaningless, unless you know your risk in the first place. If your risk of recurrence is 15%, you are only reducing it by 5%. And this doesn't even reflect the harm that could be done to those who don't need the treatment.

What is that harm? There are the toxicities that can end your life: leukemia and heart failure. There are toxicities that can ruin your life: loss of libido, loss of cognitive function, severe joint pain, and bone fractures. These harms are usually ignored or understated. One of the reasons is because they are understudied.

Source: Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 23 (December), 2003: 4299-4305
gdpawel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter