HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2013, 03:03 PM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
way to make herceptin much more effective IDd

JUNE 10, 2013 0 0
Engineered molecules boost immune attack on cancer, researchers say

BY CHRISTOPHER VAUGHAN




Building on previous research showing that cancer cells send signals to the immune system to avoid being attacked, Stanford scientists have engineered new molecules that are highly proficient at neutralizing those signals.

The molecules dramatically increase the effectiveness of certain existing cancer therapies and may open up other avenues for treating cancer using patients' own immune systems.

School of Medicine researchers have previously shown that CD47, a molecule found on the surface of many cancers, acts as a "don't eat me" signal that protects the cancer from roving immune cells called macrophages. The scientists found that when they used drugs to block this "don't eat me" signal, macrophages engulfed and destroyed the cancer cells.

More recently, Stanford scientists wondered if they could engineer molecules that block the signal more effectively. They began by modifying a protein called SIRP-alpha, which is found on macrophages and is the natural receptor for CD47. In a paper published online May 30 in Science, a team of scientists working with professors Christopher Garcia, PhD, and Irving Weissman, MD, report that they have engineered new versions of SIRP-alpha that bind much more strongly to CD47 than the natural version of the molecule, making them extremely potent blockers of the "don't eat me" signal.


Two MD/PhD students in the Stanford Medical Scientist Training Program — Kipp Weiskopf, MPhil, and Aaron Ring, MS — devised the strategy for engineering these new molecules and were lead authors of the Science paper.

"This is the best example of how science and medical training can lead to discovery and medical translation," said Weissman, professor of pathology and of developmental biology. "Weiskopf and Ring fleshed out the ideas that led to this project, bringing the complementary expertise of our groups together."

The engineered SIRP-alpha variants bind approximately 50,000 times more strongly to CD47 than native SIRP-alpha, making them highly potent drugs, Weiskopf said. But the researchers found blocking the CD47 "don't eat me" signal is not, by itself, enough to stimulate macrophages to attack cancer cells. Instead, the group demonstrated that blocking CD47 boosts the activity of macrophages when a second "eat me" signal is provided. This signal can be provided by certain anti-cancer antibody therapeutics, many of which are already approved by the FDA and in use clinically.

These findings have tremendous therapeutic implications, Ring said, because the high-affinity SIRP-alpha molecules could selectively boost the destruction of cancer cells by these antibody therapies, without increasing toxic side effects such as the destruction of healthy, non-cancerous cells.

The authors found that their engineered SIRP-alpha molecules would enhance a number of widely used antibody therapies such as rituximab (which targets certain lymphomas and leukemias), trastuzumab (which targets certain kinds of breast cancer) and cetuximab (which targets certain kinds of head and neck cancer and colon cancer).

When physicians used an anti-cancer antibody like these to fight cancer, the antibody's "eat me" signal to the macrophage is fighting against the cancer's "don't eat me" signal coming from the CD47, the researchers explain. When the high-affinity SIRP-alpha binds tightly to the CD47 molecules on the cancer, it takes the brakes off the macrophage attack on the cancer cells.

"When physicians use an anti-cancer antibody like trastuzumab to fight breast cancer, the 'don't eat me signal' from CD47 on the cancer limits the effectiveness of the antibody," said Ring. "Potentially, any anti-cancer antibody that stimulates immune cells could benefit from this combination therapy."

In one experiment, when either rituximab or the high-affinity SIRP-alpha variants were used by themselves on mice with human lymphomas, they were only able to slow tumor growth. However, when the two therapies were combined, researchers found they were able to eliminate the tumors completely. "Antibodies are like guided missiles in terms of targeting cancer cells," Weiskopf said. "By combining them with the high-affinity SIRP-alpha variants, you are adding high-explosive warheads to those missiles ."

The researchers hope that their work with high-affinity SIRP-alpha molecules will lead to more effective targeted-cancer therapies in the clinic. "This work further validates the strategy of targeting CD47 to enhance macrophage attack of cancer," according to Weissman. "This strategy must still be tested in humans to evaluate safety, but anti-CD47 antibodies are on schedule for the first trials in patients next year."

Other authors of the paper include graduate student Chia Chi M. Ho; instructor Jens-Peter Volkmer, MD; former postdoctoral scholar Aron Levin, PhD; postdoctoral scholars Anne Kathrin Volkmer, MD, Engin Özkan, PhD, and Nathaniel Fernhoff, PhD; and Matt van de Rijn, MD, PhD, professor of pathology.

This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the Stanford Medical Scientist Training Program, the School of Medicine's SPARK program, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Joseph & Laurie Lacob Gynecologic/Ovarian Cancer Fund, the Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Christopher Vaughan is communications manager at the Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine.

- See more at: http://med.stanford.edu/ism/2013/jun....qwy2AZhn.dpuf
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 03:58 PM   #2
Rolepaul
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boulder Colorado as of January 2013
Posts: 389
Re: way to make herceptin much more effective IDd

This is really important. I have also heard that there was another drug similar to this that seemed to also act to help targeted therapies. This is the next step in fighting this frustrating disease. I will follow this work closely. I know a gentleman whose son would be about the right age with the same last name. I will ask Rich if it is his son. This what the Susan B Komen group and others should be funding. Good for the groups that did.
Rolepaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 01:47 AM   #3
Mandamoo
Senior Member
 
Mandamoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 432
Re: way to make herceptin much more effective IDd

Do all of us have CD47 on our cancer cells - could this be why some are resistant to herceptin from the start? It is something I don't understand and I guess it is very complex. When you have never responded to hercepting despit being highly her2 positive you have to wonder why?

If my current treatment stops working my onc wants to quit her2 therapies all together - partially because I will need to start funding them (at $60000) a year and I have never shown much benefit from them she feels the cost is perhaps unjustified. There seems to be so little for those of us for who herceptin is ineffective.
Mandamoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 03:36 PM   #4
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
Re: way to make herceptin much more effective IDd

Mandamoo--there are many things that can make a cancer resistant to her2 directed antibodies (you did not say if Lapatinib has worked for you)

Among others:

your her2 is a shortened version which does not have the right area for the antiher2 antibody to grab onto (lapatinib, neratinib and other TKIs might then work for you)

your her2 does not have the right configuration in that area for herceptin to grab onto (pertuzumab may work for you)

Your tumor is also being driven by her3 (pertuzumab may work for you and perhaps other TKIs like neratinib), your tumor is also being driven my IGFR1
or other pathways that crosstalk--in which case you need the right combination to block two or three of these pathways or a pathway downstream (PI3K inhibitors, AKT inhibitors, mTor inhibitors) or something which keeps proteins from being folded/chaperone'ing like a HSP 90 inhibitor.

Your tumor may make a lot of mucin which coats the cells and keeps the antibodies from getting close enough to block the receptors (an antiMuc antibody might be helpful)

But helping the immune system get around some of cancer's tricks to keep it from recognizing and working may be easier than characterizing all the paths your tumor uses to escape herceptin and blocking them all.

That is why this finding, Dr. Ronald Levy's latest work and the adoptive T cell therapy of Dr Rosenberg give so much hope.

Hope this explanation helped

For more discussion of how her2+ cancers get around herceptin, read the works of Dr Carlos Arteaga among others (just google ENTREZ PUBMED and enter Arteaga C)
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 04:10 PM   #5
Mandamoo
Senior Member
 
Mandamoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 432
Re: way to make herceptin much more effective IDd

Great reply thank you Lani!
My tries so far - I've done everolimus with herceptin and vinorelbine - best response - 7 months of stability
Tykerb and Xeloda - best response in reduction of disease but not maintained - progression after 5months (skin mets disappeared though - lung mets grew back)
TDM1 - no response really apart from slowing of progression
Herceptin, pertuzamab and carboplatin - significant progression (may have occurred awaiting pertuzamab as it was held up in customs - possible I was stable for a couple of months) currently changed carboplatin for Abraxane - have seem a small decline in tumor markers after first cycle - first decline in 12 months - scans next week.
My problem is I'm in Australia with limited access now to trials
I have spoken to one onc about afatinib - which I think is worth a go given my success with tykerb. Using everolimus again is an option too.
I've asked my onc to look into HSP90 options too.
I have a p53 mutation in the cancer also and I know I also highly express her3 but not EFGR or pi3k. But then not each tumor is the same.
I will look at the articles and info you suggest but I fear I will not be able to access anything here in Australia.
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
__________________
Amanda xx
40 year old Mum to three gorgeous kids - son 5 and daughters 8 and 11
Wife to my wonderfully supportive husband of 17 years!
22 February 2011 - Diagnosed Early Breast Cancer IDBC Stage2b (ER/PR -ve, Her2+ve +++) - 38 years old
(L) skin sparing mastectomy with tissue expander, axilla clearance (2/14 affected) clear margins.
Fec*3, Taxotere and herceptin*2 - stopped due to secondary diagnosis

June 24 2011 Stage IV - Skin met, axilla node, multiple lung lesions

Bolero3 trial - Navelbine, Hereptin weekly, daily Everolimus/Placebo
February 2012 - July 2012 Tykerb and Xeloda - skin mets resolved, Lungs initially dramatically reduced but growing again
August 2012 (turn 40!) tykerb and herceptin (denied compassionate use of TDM1) while holidaying in Italy!
September 2012 - January 2013 TDM1 as part of the Th3resa trial - lymph nodes resolved, lungs slowly progressing.
January 2013 - herceptin, carboplatin and Perjeta (compassionate access)
April 2013 - Some progression in lungs and lymph nodes - Abraxane, Herceptin and Perjeta
July 2013 - mixed response - dramatic reduction of most lung disease, progression of smaller lung nodules and cervical and hilar nodes - ? Add avastin.
Mandamoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 03:48 AM   #6
cheery
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 44
Re: way to make herceptin much more effective IDd

Lani, thanks so much for the insight. I've been reading up past 5 years but your post just goes to show how little I know about HER2+ disease.
cheery is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter