HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > Articles of Interest
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-06-2009, 05:00 PM   #1
Rich66
Senior Member
 
Rich66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South East Wisconsin
Posts: 3,431
(MUC1 agonist to reverse multiple resistances) MUC1* is a determinant of trastuzumab

1: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 May 5. [Epub ahead of print]
MUC1* is a determinant of trastuzumab (Herceptin) resistance in breast cancer cells.

Fessler SP, Wotkowicz MT, Mahanta SK, Bamdad C.
Minerva Biotechnologies, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
In the United States, 211,000 women are diagnosed each year with breast cancer. Of the 42,000 breast cancer patients who overexpress the HER2 growth factor receptor, <35% are responsive to treatment with the HER2-disabling antibody, called trastuzumab (Herceptin). Despite those statistics, women diagnosed with breast cancer are now tested to determine how much of this important growth factor receptor is present in their tumor because patients whose treatment includes trastuzumab are three-times more likely to survive for at least 5 years and are two-times more likely to survive without a cancer recurrence. Unfortunately, even among the group whose cancers originally respond to trastuzumab, 25% of the metastatic breast cancer patients acquire resistance to trastuzumab within the first year of treatment. Follow-on "salvage" therapies have prolonged life for this group but have not been curative. Thus, it is critically important to understand the mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance and develop therapies that reverse or prevent it. Here, we report that molecular analysis of a cancer cell line that was induced to acquire trastuzumab resistance showed a dramatic increase in the amount of the cleaved form of the MUC1 protein, called MUC1*. We recently reported that MUC1* functions as a growth factor receptor on cancer cells and on embryonic stem cells. Here, we show that treating trastuzumab-resistant cancer cells with a combination of MUC1* antagonists and trastuzumab, reverses the drug resistance. Further, HER2-positive cancer cells that are intrinsically resistant to trastuzumab became trastuzumab-sensitive when treated with MUC1* antagonists and trastuzumab. Additionally, we found that tumor cells that had acquired Herceptin resistance had also acquired resistance to standard chemotherapy agents like Taxol, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide. Acquired resistance to these standard chemotherapy drugs was also reversed by combined treatment with the original drug plus a MUC1* inhibitor.
PMID: 19415485 [PubMed - as supplied by publishe
Rich66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 05:04 PM   #2
Rich66
Senior Member
 
Rich66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South East Wisconsin
Posts: 3,431



Clinical Cancer Research 15, 100, January 1, 2009. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1745
© 2009 American Association for Cancer Research


Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Intracellular MUC1 Peptides Inhibit Cancer Progression

Benjamin G. Bitler2, Ina Menzl2, Carmen L. Huerta1, Barbara Sands1, Wendy Knowlton1, Andrew Chang1 and Joyce A. Schroeder1,2,3 Authors' Affiliations: 1 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, 2 Arizona Cancer Center, and 3 Bio5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
Requests for reprints: Joyce A. Schroeder, Molecular and Cellular Biology, Arizona Cancer Center, PO Box 245024, Tucson, AZ 85724-5024. Phone: 520-626-1384; Fax: 520-626-3764; E-mail: jschroeder@azcc.arizona.edu.
Purpose: During cancer progression, the oncoprotein MUC1 binds β-catenin while simultaneously inhibiting the degradation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), resulting in enhanced transformation and metastasis. The purpose of this study was to design a peptide-based therapy that would block these intracellular protein-protein interactions as a treatment for metastatic breast cancer.
Experimental Design: The amino acid residues responsible for these interactions lie in tandem in the cytoplasmic domain of MUC1, and we have targeted this sequence to produce a MUC1 peptide that blocks the protumorigenic functions of MUC1. We designed the MUC1 inhibitory peptide (MIP) to block the intracellular interactions between MUC1/β-catenin and MUC1/EGFR. To allow for cellular uptake we synthesized MIP adjacent to the protein transduction domain, PTD4 (PMIP).
Results: We have found that PMIP acts in a dominant-negative fashion, blocking both MUC1/β-catenin and MUC1/EGFR interactions. In addition, PMIP induces ligand-dependent reduction of EGFR levels. These effects correspond to a significant reduction in proliferation, migration, and invasion of metastatic breast cancer cells in vitro, and inhibition of tumor growth and recurrence in an established MDA-MB-231 immunocompromised (SCID) mouse model. Importantly, PMIP also inhibits genetically driven breast cancer progression, as injection of tumor-bearing MMTV-pyV mT transgenic mice with PMIP results in tumor regression and a significant inhibition of tumor growth rate.
Conclusions: These data show that intracellular MUC1 peptides possess significant antitumor activity and have important clinical applications in the treatment of cancer.
Rich66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2009, 05:16 PM   #3
Rich66
Senior Member
 
Rich66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South East Wisconsin
Posts: 3,431
Anyone know if MUC1 inhibitors are available?
Rich66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2009, 06:20 AM   #4
Hopeful
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,380
?

"Of the 42,000 breast cancer patients who overexpress the HER2 growth factor receptor, <35% are responsive to treatment with the HER2-disabling antibody, called trastuzumab (Herceptin)."

I'd like to see how they arrived at this stat.

Hopeful
Hopeful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2009, 06:49 PM   #5
Rich66
Senior Member
 
Rich66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South East Wisconsin
Posts: 3,431
That stat sounds unfortunately familiar to me. Maybe the MUC1 approach would change that.
Rich66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2009, 06:27 AM   #6
Hopeful
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,380
The stat is meaningless unless we know what it represents - is this 35% of ALL Her2+ patients, both metastatic and early stage bc? Stats that lump those two groups together are not useful.

Hopeful
Hopeful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2009, 02:17 PM   #7
Rich66
Senior Member
 
Rich66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South East Wisconsin
Posts: 3,431
Yup. Very vague considering it is used in mono and combination therapy for various stages. Just meant I seemd to have read elsewhere about a 25-30% response

From Genentech:
http://www.gene.com/gene/products/in...factsheet.html

Whatever teh response rate is..it's good to see something in the works to improve it or reverse acquired resistance. of course, never fast enough.
Rich66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter