HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-25-2009, 10:53 PM   #1
Alice
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: southern california
Posts: 287
er-pr-her2+++ feeling a little left out! this one's for you Lani!

I was just on the thread that linked to Burris on tdmi and was hard pressed to find anything regarding er-pr-. All of the research seems to be directed to er+pr+ patients (no offence intended) and I just feel as though if there is not a profit (pharmasuticly sp), that the rest of us are left out in the cold. I could be wrong and I hope Lani will let me know if there are people out there researching the er-pr- cases out there???
Alice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 12:58 AM   #2
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
actually I found the literature the exact opposite of what you report

All the series on molecular profiling have a special subclass of breast cancer which is her2+ er- but didn't know where to classify her2+ er+ (sometimes in luminal B. sometimes totally ignored as they hadn't a clue)

Four years ago the literature refelcted that only 10% of her+ breast cancers were er+--now they usually quote 45% or so of her2+s are er+..

Many more studies are done of breast cancer cell line SKBr3 which is her2+er- than of BT474 which is her2+er-

So I don't know where you get your impression.

Perhaps because I go out of my way to try report what they are learning about her2+er+ as it is a complicated task of discovering how best to treat it ie, should fulvestrant be given rather than rather than tamoxifen, is it OK to give tamoxifen or AIs alone without herceptin after the year of herceptin ends, since tykerb has been shown to upregulate ER, does herceptin also.

It seems much more difficult to "cure" her2+ ER+ breast cancer in mice as Drs Osbourne and Schiff have as it requires blocking EGFR, her2, her3 and
may also require estrogen deprivation if it does not happen quickly.

I have been posting on her2+ER+ particularly as I felt it had been getting short-shrift in terms of research. The treatment of her2+er- breast cancer seemed much better studied with results much more straightforward.

I specifically made the effort to find papers on her2+er+ breast cancer because I had exactly the opposite impression than you did--ie that there was a scarcity of research/knowledge re her2+er+ breast cancer compared with her2+er- breast cancer. Jean and others had asked me to be on the outlook for papers comparing the efficacy of various antihormonal treatments for her2+ breast cancer.

Let me know why you think your perception and my perception are at opposite ends of the pole
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2009, 11:07 AM   #3
Alice
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: southern california
Posts: 287
Hi Lani,
I was reading this late last night and did not have much time to do additional research. I was mainly speaking to this particular article. I also won't have much time to investigate until this weekend. At a quick glance on the web I am finding mostly tripple neg articles. As I said this was just a very limited time search, I will do more this weekend. Thanks for getting back so quickly.
Alice
Alice is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter