HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-11-2015, 12:56 PM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
PERJETA + Herceptin + docetaxel nearly doubled pCR rates vs Herceptin-- NeoSphere

trial results summary



Patients with HER2+ early stage breast cancer may benefit from PERJETA-based therapy prior to surgery

Patient eligibility for preoperative therapy with PERJETA1

HER2+ status and at least one of the following:

Tumor(s) >2 cm

Node+

Inflammatory breast cancer

The outcome of preoperative systemic therapy is assessed by pathological complete response (pCR)

PERJETA + Herceptin + docetaxel nearly doubled pCR rates vs Herceptin + docetaxel in the NeoSphere trial

pCR rate in breast and nodes (FDA-preferred endpoint)

• PERJETA + Herceptin (n=107): 11.2% pCR (95% CI: 5.9-18.8; P=0.0223) vs Herceptin + docetaxel

• PERJETA + docetaxel (n=96): 17.7% pCR (95% CI: 10.7-26.8; P=0.0018) vs PERJETA + Herceptin + docetaxel

Results of the phase II randomized NeoSphere trial (referred to as Study 2 in the PERJETA prescribing information). Treatment cycles were received every 3 weeks. During the neoadjuvant period, all patients received 4 cycles of their respective therapies. PERJETA dosing: 840 mg loading dose, 420 mg for subsequent cycles; Herceptin dosing: 8 mg/kg loading dose, 6 mg/kg for subsequent cycles (administered to complete 1 year of treatment); docetaxel dosing: 75 mg/m2 each cycle, escalated to 100 mg/m2 at investigator’s discretion if initial dose was well tolerated. Patients in the PERJETA + Herceptin neoadjuvant arm received 4 cycles of docetaxel + Herceptin as adjuvant therapy. pCR in breast was the primary endpoint studied in the NeoSphere trial.
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 05:41 PM   #2
schoonder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 186
Re: PERJETA + Herceptin + docetaxel nearly doubled pCR rates vs Herceptin-- NeoSphere

On a similar note:

Neoadjuvant T-DM1 Shows Promising pCR Rates in HER2+/HR+ Early Breast Cancer | Page 1 Silas Inman @silasinman Published Online: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 - See more at:

Chemotherapy-free neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; Kadcyla) demonstrated a pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 40.5% in patients with HER2+ and HR+ early breast cancer, according to findings from the phase II ADAPT trial presented at the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting."After 12 weeks without systemic chemotherapies we observed more than a 40% pCR in both the breast and nodes in our T-DM1-treated HER+/HR+ patients," said lead investigator Nadia Harbeck, MD, PhD, head of the Breast Center, Oncological Therapy and Clinical Trials Unit, University of Munich, Germany. "We did see very low overall toxicity, and did not detect any new safety signals."

The ADAPT trial is a large umbrella trial that has enrolled 5000 patients with various breast cancer phenotypes. In the arm of the trial presented at ASCO, 376 patients with HER2+ and HR+ breast cancer were randomized to receive neoadjuvant T-DM1 at 3.6 mg/kg with or without endocrine therapy or trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy. Treatment was administered for 4 cycles followed by surgery and 1-year of standard adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab.The primary endpoint of the study was pCR between each of the T-DM1 arms in comparison with the trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy arm. For this evaluation, pCR was defined as no invasive carcinoma in the breast and lymph nodes (ypT0).In January 2015, an independent data and safety monitoring board analyzed results from an interim analysis of 130 patients. As a result of the high-level of efficacy seen in the T-DM1 arms, the board recommended that the study should be stopped.Of the 130 patients analyzed, more than half were premenopausal (range, 45.8%-60%). The majority of tumors were larger than 2 centimeters (range, 45.9%-57.8%) and a third of patients were node positive (range, 27.1%-37.8%). Three-fourths of patients across all three arms had G3 disease.

"As you can see from the baseline characteristics, this was not a low-risk population," said Harbeck.The pCR rate was found to be substantially higher in the T-DM1 arms compared with trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy (P <.001). In the T-DM1 alone arm (n = 37), the pCR rate was 40.5%. In the T-DM1 plus endocrine therapy arm (n = 48), the pCR rate was 45.8%. In the trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy arm (n = 45), the pCR rate was just 6.7%.
In an exploratory analysis of the T-DM1 arms it was found that pCR rates differed substantially between pre- and post-menopausal patients. In premenopausal patients (n = 22), single-agent T-DM1 demonstrated a 27% pCR rate versus 60% in those who were postmenopausal. A substantial difference between was not observed between the two groups in the combination arm (45.5% vs 46.2%)."In the premenopausal patients, adding endocrine therapy increased pCR from 27% to about 46%, whereas this was not the case in the postmenopsaul patients," Harbeck said. "This is an interim analysis and these are low numbers, but these need to be followed-up because in the postmenopausal patients we did see a slight decrease when endocrine therapy was added."Similar pCR rates to the ADAPT trial have been seen across several studies for patients with HER2+/HR+ early breast cancer. However, these trials generally assessed 12 to 24 weeks of chemotherapy with either single or dual HER2 inhibition. Additionally, the definition of pCR varied, with only a few defining the endpoint as ypT0.

In the NSABP B-41 trial, the pCR rate in patients with HER2+/HR+ early breast cancer treated with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab was 46%. In those who received chemotherapy with trastuzumab plus lapatinib, the pCR rate was 55%. Similarly, in the GeparSepto trial, the pCR rate with epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, nab-paclitaxel, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab was 56%. Without nab-paclitaxel, the pCR rate was 50%."It's obviously always difficult to make these cross-study comparison," Harbeck noted. "But, I don't think it is unreasonable to assume that our pCR rates in the ADAPT trial after only 4 cycles of T-DM1 compare quite well to other trials where patients got 24 weeks of aggressive chemotherapy plus dual blockade."Across all arms of the ADAPT trial there were only 16 serious adverse events in 13 patients. The most common all-grade adverse events with single-agent T-DM1 were thrombocytopenia (30%), aspartate aminotransferase increase (19%), alanine aminotransferase increase (22%), and infections and infestations (11%)."We had no problems administering the study medications for all 4 cycles. There were no grade 4 adverse events reported," Harbeck said. "Only 7 of the serious adverse events were related to the study medication, and mostly they were labeled serious because patients had to undergo unplanned hospitalization."

In the T-DM1 combination arm, some of the adverse events seen with single-agent T-DM1 were less frequent. The most common all-grade adverse events in this arm were thrombocytopenia (15%), infections and infestations (15%), aspartate aminotransferase increase (10%), and alanine aminotransferase increase (6%)."In our study, there was a lower frequency of higher grade events associated with T-DM1," Harbeck explained. "These were all treatment-naive patients, before they started T-DM1. In all other trials reported so far, patients had extensive pretreatment, including chemotherapy."Moreover, a prospective trial will be needed to compare single-agent T-DM1 to chemotherapy plus dual HER2 blockade. Given the single-agent activity, further assessment is warranted; based on findings from the study, it could be possible to explore lower doses of T-DM1, Herbeck suggested. Modifications to the ADAPT trial are planned, to further assess T-DM1 in patients with HER+/HR+ breast cancer.

http://www.onclive.com/web-exclusive...reast-cancer/1
schoonder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 05:58 PM   #3
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
Re: PERJETA + Herceptin + docetaxel nearly doubled pCR rates vs Herceptin-- NeoSphere

TDM1 is NOT cheno-free--the chemo it contains ( a maytansinoid) is an agent so toxic it cannot be used unless tethered to something which targets it only to the relevant cells(the herceptin it is linked to) and tethered to that so strongly in a way that it is only released when it gets inside the cell (Trojan horse-style).

I have posted both these results before while I attended ASCO in May/June, but reposted as genentech seems to be targeting prescribers (recently) with the info in the article ie, making it seem some other news might be upcoming shortly.

The aarticle applies to ER+ and ER- tumor pCR rates, whereas the second article is unique to er+HER2+ tumors, a subsubgroup which until now did not have any different treatment recommendations based on trial results than er-her2-

The treatment recommendations still have not changed as these are only reported trials, not treatment recommendations which is why Genentech's recent announcement to prescribers seemed so strange(will it prove timely???)
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2015, 06:26 PM   #4
schoonder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 186
Re: PERJETA + Herceptin + docetaxel nearly doubled pCR rates vs Herceptin-- NeoSphere

Yes, unlike the docetaxel component in the NeoSphere trial, the very potent maytansine toxin conjugated to the herceptin, boosted the pCR percentile in the ADAPT trial from 6.7 to 40+
schoonder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2015, 03:43 PM   #5
agness
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 285
Re: PERJETA + Herceptin + docetaxel nearly doubled pCR rates vs Herceptin-- NeoSphere

When will they get to more personalized treatment. I suspect that four doses of Docetaxol and carboplatin were more than enough, that surgery and rads were unnecessary and that 16 doses of Herceptin was more than required for systemic treatment. As it stands I had central nervous system occult disease that was untreated even as I too had a PCR last year.
__________________
  • Dx 2/14 3b HER2+/HR- left breast, left axilla, internal mammary node (behind breast bone). Neoadjuvant TCHP 3/14-7/2. PCR 8/14 LX and SND. 10/21-12/9 Proton therapy to chest wall.
  • Dx 7/20/15 cerebellar met 3.5x5cm HER2+/HR-/GATA3+ 7/23/15 Craniotomy.
  • 7/29/15 bone scan clear. 8/3/15 PET clean scan. LINAC SRS (5 fractions) Sept 2015. 9/17/15 CSF NED, 9/24/15 CSF NED, 11/2/15 CSF NED.
  • 10/27/15 atypical uptake in right cerebellum - inflammation?
  • 12/1/15 Leptomeningeal dx. Starting IT Herceptin.
  • 1/16 - 16 fractions of tomotherapy to cerebellum, break of IT Herceptin during rads, resume at 100 mg weekly
  • 3/2016 - stable scan
  • 5/2016 stable scan
  • 7/2016 pseudoprogression?
  • 9/2016 more LM, start new chemo protocol and IV therapy treatment with HBOT
  • 11/2016 Cyberknife to temporal lobe, HBOT just prior
  • 12/2016 - lesions starting to show shrinkage
  • 8/2017 - Stable since Dec 2016. Temporal lobe lesion gone.
  • Using TCM, naturopathic oncology, physical therapy, chiro, massage, medical qigong, and energetic healing modalities in tandem. Stops at nothing.
  • Mother of 2 boys - ages 7 and 10 (8/2017) and a lovely partner with lots to live for.
agness is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter