HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-06-2009, 10:48 AM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
oligometastatic disease

we have previously speculated that if they followed more closely and found limited disease sooner and treated it more effectively/expediciously, perhaps there would be improvement in the prognosis statistics for those with Stage IV

Here is a small. but hopeful study out of Japan:

Anticancer Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6B):3929-31.

Value of high-dose radiation therapy for isolated osseous metastasis in breast cancer in terms of oligo-recurrence.

Niibe Y, Kuranami M, Matsunaga K, Takaya M, Kakita S, Hara T, Sekiguchi K, Watanabe M, Hayakawa K.
Department of Radiology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1, Kitasato, Sagamihrara, Kanagawa 228-8555, Japan. joe-n@nkg.odn.ne.jp
BACKGROUND: For many years, patients with recurrent or distant metastatic cancer have been considered to be at the last stage of their lives because it was considered that the cancer had spread throughout the whole body. However, the development of methods for the early detection of recurrence or distant metastases allows the detection of limited site recurrence or single organ metastases, called oligometastases or oligo-recurrence. Additional local treatment for oligometastatic or oligo-recurrent lesions such as radiation therapy could be efficacious. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate radiation therapy for solitary osseous metastasis of breast cancer in terms of oligometastasis and oligo-recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirteen breast cancer patients were treated with radiation therapy for osseous metastases at Kitasato University Hospital, Japan between January 1998 and March 2003. Out of them, seven patients had solitary osseous metastases with primary and other sites controlled. These patients were registered in the current study, three had lumber spine metastases, three pelvic and one thoracic spine. The median time between the initial treatment of the primary lesions and diagnosis of the osseous metastases was 44 months (range: 10-95 months). The median total radiation dose was 46 Gy (30-50 Gy; BED: biological effective dose, 39-60 Gy10). RESULTs: The median follow-up time was 40 months (range: 11-80 months). All the patients were alive at the last follow-up. Only one patient relapsed in terms of pain from the osseous metastasis. This patient was treated with 30 Gy (BED 39 Gy10) irradiation, the lowest total dose among the seven patients. CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy for solitary osseous metastasis might be efficacious and moreover, high dose could be useful for long-term pain relief of osseous metastasis.
PMID: 19192651
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2009, 11:47 PM   #2
CourtneyL
Senior Member
 
CourtneyL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 260
Lani - You are fantastic. Thank you for all of the incredibly helpful posts on scientific studies and advances in BC treatment. I personally owe you credit for the Boswellia recommendation. Thank you, thank you, for all that you do.
__________________
4/17/08: Dx Stage IV at age 30 - extensive mets to liver, lungs, and bones. Er/Pr-, Her2+++
April 08-Aug 08:Taxotere, Cytoxan, Herceptin, Zometa - complete response!
Sept 08-Dec 08: Herceptin +Zometa for maintenance.

Jan 09-April 09: Brain mets. Add Tykerb. Watch and wait.
April 09: Gamma Knife 10 brain mets, add Xeloda.
Sept 09: Gamma Knife to 1 brain met.
Nov 09- April 10: Lung progression, add Gemzar to Herceptin, Zometa.
May 10- Sept 10: HER2 Vaccine Trial

Sept 10: Add Tykerb for more brain mets.
Oct 10: Gamma Knife to 7 brain mets.
Dec 10: Switch from Zometa to Denosumab.
Jan 11: Gamma Knife to 3 brain mets.
March 11: Gemzar/Herceptin for lung/bone progression.
April 11: More brain mets - Intrathecal Herceptin
June 11: Ixempra/Herceptin for lung, soft tissue progression.
Aug 11: Gamma Knife
Sep 11: Abraxane/Herceptin
Future: NED

Send me a PM if you'd like to follow my journey on Caringbridge.
CourtneyL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2009, 07:59 AM   #3
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
Courtney

You are VERY welcome
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2009, 09:30 AM   #4
Debbie L.
Senior Member
 
Debbie L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 463
am I reading this wrong?

Maybe I missed something here, or they forgot to mention it due to language issues - but there doesn't even seem to be a control group. How can they draw any conclusions without a control group?

I have ordered a book, "Know Your Chances", which is supposed to be an understandable discussion and explanation of how to make sense of health-related statistics. I think everyone who pays any attention to research should have this basic understanding. If we rely on media headlines, or even many abstracts, we will be mis-informed.

http://www.amazon.com/Know-Your-Chan...4542365&sr=1-1

Man! tinyurl: http://tinyurl.com/ckedls
Debbie L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter