HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > Articles of Interest
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-27-2006, 02:15 PM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
It may turn out that its best to combine VEGF inhibitors with radiation tx or chemo

Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 12, 3518-3524, June 1, 2006
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research
Cancer Therapy: Preclinical

Ionizing Radiation Antagonizes Tumor Hypoxia Induced by Antiangiogenic Treatment

Oliver Riesterer1, Michael Honer3, Wolfram Jochum2, Christoph Oehler1, Simon Ametamey3 and Martin Pruschy1
Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1 Radiation Oncology and 2 Pathology, University Hospital Zurich and 3 Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences, ETH Hönggerberg, Zürich, Switzerland

Requests for reprints: Martin Pruschy, Laboratory for Molecular Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistr. 100, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland. Phone: 41-44-255-8549; Fax: 41-44-255-4435; E-mail: martin.pruschy@usz.ch.

Purpose: The combined treatment modality of ionizing radiation with inhibitors of angiogenesis is effective despite the supposition that inhibition of angiogenesis might increase tumor hypoxia and thereby negatively affect radiation sensitivity. To directly assess this still controversial issue, we analyzed treatment-dependent alterations of tumor oxygenation in response to inhibition of angiogenesis alone, ionizing radiation, and combined treatment.

Experimental Design: Serial measurements with high-resolution [18F]fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography and immunohistochemical detection of the endogenous hypoxia marker glucose transporter-1 were done to determine tumor hypoxia in a murine mammary carcinoma allograft model.

Results: Inhibition of angiogenesis with the clinically relevant vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor PTK787/ZK222584 reduced microvessel density but had only minimal effects on tumor growth, tumor cell apoptosis, and proliferation. However, PTK787/ZK222584 treatment increased overall and local tumor hypoxia as revealed by extended expression of the hypoxia marker glucose transporter-1 and increased uptake of [18F]fluoromisonidazole. Fractionated irradiation induced a strong growth delay, which was associated with enhanced apoptosis and reduced proliferation of tumor cells but only minor effects on microvessel density and allograft oxygenation. Combined treatment with fractionated irradiation resulted in extended tumor growth delay and tumor cell apoptosis but no increase in tumor hypoxia.

Conclusions: These results show that irradiation antagonizes the increase of hypoxia by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition and abrogates the potential negative effect on tumor hypoxia. Thus, the risk of treatment-induced hypoxia by inhibitors of angiogenesis exists but is kept minimal when combined with a cytotoxic treatment modality.
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2006, 09:54 PM   #2
al from Canada
Senior Member
 
al from Canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 722
never even gave this thought..

Only because usually drugs like avastin are used in a metastatic setting where rads arn't commonly used. It's good to know these results as the need may arise.
Al
__________________
Primary care-giver to and advocate for Linda, who passed away April 27, 2006.
al from Canada is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter