HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-19-2014, 05:09 PM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
someone asked me for this--Stage IV not previously exposed 2 herceptin respond better

could not remember who asked me, in which thread, but here it is:

ABSTRACT: Effect of adjuvant/neoadjuvant trastuzumab on clinical outcomes in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
[Cancer]

Background: The purpose of the current study was to describe the outcomes of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressed/amplified (HER2+) early breast cancer who received adjuvant or neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy and were subsequently retreated with trastuzumab for metastatic disease.

Methods: A total of 353 patients with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer who were treated with trastuzumab as part of their first-line treatment for metastatic disease were identified. A total of 75 patients had received adjuvant or neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy for early breast cancer, and 278 had not. Clinical outcomes of patients who had or had not received prior trastuzumab were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression analyses. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: The clinical benefit (complete response, partial response, or stable disease of ≥ 6 months) rates were 71% in the group who did not receive prior trastuzumab and 39% in the group previously treated with trastuzumab. The adjusted odds ratios were 0.28 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.13-0.59; P = .0009) for clinical benefit rates and 0.39 (95% CI, 0.18-0.82; P = .038) for objective (complete or partial) response rates. In the univariate analysis, the median overall survival rate was longer in the group who did not receive prior trastuzumab (36 months vs 28 months) (hazards ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.07-2.01 [P = .022]). The multivariate analysis found no significant difference in overall survival.

Conclusions: When treated with trastuzumab for metastatic disease, patients with HER2+ breast cancer without prior exposure to trastuzumab were found to have superior clinical outcomes to those with prior exposure. Prior trastuzumab exposure should be considered in treatment algorithms and in HER2-targeted clinical trial enrollment for metastatic disease.
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2014, 11:53 PM   #2
Pamelamary
Senior Member
 
Pamelamary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 494
Re: someone asked me for this--Stage IV not previously exposed 2 herceptin respond be

It wasn't me, but as someone who missed out on Herceptin at first diagnosis, this is somewhat comforting....
Thanks Lani.... Pam
__________________
Diagnosed 2004: Lumpectomy - 2 tumours, both grade 1 infiltrating duct carcinoma, about 12mm. ER+,
C-erbB-2 status 3+.
Clear margins, no nodal involvement.
Radiotherapy, i year Tamoxifen, 4 years Arimidex.
Rediagnosed 2012: Multiple bone metastases.
3/12: began on Marianne trial - T-DM1 + Pertuzamab/Placebo.
5/12:Unexpected development of numerous bilateral liver mets. Came off trial.
Started Docetaxol/ Herceptin + Zometa.
8/12:Bones stable +major regression in liver (!)
9/12:Can't take any more Docetaxol! Start on Herceptin and Tamoxifen. Cross fingers!
Changed to Denosumab.
11/12: Scan shows stable - yay!
11/13: Still stable :-) !!!
1/16: All stable, but lowered calcium, so switched to Zometa 3 monthly.
2/19: Happily still stable on Herceptin, Letrozole and 3 monthly Zometa.
Pamelamary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 07:23 AM   #3
Debbie L.
Senior Member
 
Debbie L.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 463
Re: someone asked me for this--Stage IV not previously exposed 2 herceptin respond be

That was me (asking the question) -- thanks as always, Lani!

The results are interesting. Quite strong for difference in response but not so much for OS. It would be interesting to see when this was done (just published, so I'm assuming it's current), and what other anti-HER2 agents were involved. Also whether they included denovo stage IV diagnoses.

I see an option to request patient access to the full text, but can't figure out how to do that. I've done it before but remember it being simple. There appears to be a link but when I click on it nothing happens. Does anyone have access to the full text?

Thanks again,
Debbie Laxague
Debbie L. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2014, 09:44 AM   #4
annettchen
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 95
Re: someone asked me for this--Stage IV not previously exposed 2 herceptin respond be

Thanks Lani,

sounds promising to me - I was diagnosed MBC off the bat, so I'm hoping first time exposure to Herceptin and Perjeta will give me some stability for a while... Pity that efficiency of treatment seems to be hard to tell with bone mets (which so far is all I have - hope to keep it that way as long as possible).
__________________
Annette
----------------------------------------
03/2014: Diagnosed with ER/PR-, HER2+++ MBC (bone mets, oligometastatic)
04/2014: Started 6 cycles of "PHD" (Perjeta, Herceptin, Docetaxol)
07/2014: Finished 6 cycles of PHD; restaging; 2 bone mets are sclerotic - looks like Herceptin and Perjeta is working
10/2014: STABLE!
01/2015: STABLE!
04/2015: STABLE!
08/2015: STABLE!
12/2015: BRAIN METS. BODY STABLE.
annettchen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter