HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > Articles of Interest
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-27-2007, 03:49 AM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
for gdpawel and others interested in chemosensitivity assays to predict effectiveness

of treatments according to her2 status, etc

J Int Med Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;35(6):753-61. Links
Correlation Between the In Vitro ATP-based Chemosensitivity Assay and HER2/neu Expression in Women with Breast Cancer.

Woo SU, Bae JW, Kim HG, Choi SH, Kang DH, Lee JB, Koo BW.
Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Several in vitro chemosensitivity tests have been developed to predict the chemotherapeutic response of tumours prior to initiation of individualized treatment for breast cancer. This study investigated whether the in vitro chemosensitivity response of cell lines derived from breast cancer patients was affected by HER2/neu expression. We cultured breast cancer cell lines from 50 patients and the adenosine triphosphatebased chemotherapy response assay (ATPCRA) was performed with 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine, docetaxel, doxorubicin, methotrexate, vinorelbine and paclitaxel. 5-Fluorouracil combined a high median cell death rate (32.4%) with the narrowest range of cytotoxic effects (7.3 - 65.7%). In addition, gemcitabine showed significantly greater activity in HER2/neupositive patients. In contrast, docetaxel was significantly less effective in HER2/neu-positive patients. No significant correlation was found between the other agents and HER2/neu expression. The use of the ATP-CRA test for metastatic tissue from patients with recurrent disease might be a useful approach to determine the most effective chemotherapy regimen.
PMID: 18034988 [PubMed - in process]
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 10:51 AM   #2
SoCalGal
Senior Member
 
SoCalGal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: LA LA Land
Posts: 1,607
Hi Lani,
I know that Joe asked us to post links, but for a lay person like me and many others, it's more helpful to read when you paraphrase and add lay-woman's terms.

Am checking out all of your postings this week - still trying to figure out what to do next - if anything.
Thanks Flori
__________________
1996 cancer WTF?! 1.3 cm lumpectomy Er/Pr neg. Her2+ (20nodes NEGATIVE) did CMF + rads. NED.
2002 recurrence. Bilateral mastectomy w/TFL autologous recon. Then ACx2. Skin lymphatic rash. Taxotere w/Herceptin x4. Herceptin/Xeloda. Finally stops spreading.
2003 - Back to surgery, remove skin mets, and will have surgery one week later when pathology can confirm margins.
‘03 latisimus dorsi flap to remove skin mets. CLEAN MARGINS. Continue single agent Herceptin thru 4/04. NED.
‘04 '05 & 06 tiny recurrences - scar line. surgery to cut out. NED each time.
1/2006 Rads again, to scar line. NED.

3/07 Heartbreaking news - mets! lungs.sternum. Try Tykerb/Xeloda. Tykerb/Carbo/Gemzar. Switch Oncs.
12/07 Herceptin.Tykerb. Markers go stable.
2/8/08 gamma knife 13mm stupid brain met.
3/08 Herceptin/tykerb/avastin/zometa.
3/09 brain NED. Lungs STABLE.
4/09 attack sternum (10 daysPHOTONS.5 days ELECTRONS)
9/09 MARKERS normal!
3/10 PET/CT=manubrium intensely metabolically active but stable. NEDhead.
Wash out 5/10 for tdm1 but 6/10 CT STABLE, PET improving. Markers normal. Brain NED. Resume just Herceptin plus ZOMETA
Dec 2010 Brain NED, lungs/sternum stable. markers normal.
MAR 2011 stop Herceptin/allergy! Go back on Tykerb and switch to Xgeva.
May-Aug 2011 Tykerb Herceptin Xgeva.
Sept 2011 Tykerb, Herceptin, Zometa, Avastin.
April 2012 sketchy drug trial in NYC. 6 weeks later I’m NED!
OCT 2012 PET/CT shows a bunch of freakin’ progression. Back to LA and Herceptin.avastin.zometa.
12/20/12 add in PERJETA!
March 2013 – 5 YEARS POST continue HAPZ
APRIL 2013 - 6 yrs stage 4. "FAILED" PETscan on 4/2/13
May 2013: rePetted - improvement in lungs, left adrenal stable, right 6th rib inactive, (must be PERJETA avastin) sternum and L1 fruckin'worsen. Drop zometa. ADD Xgeva. Doc says get rads consultant for L1 and possible biopsy of L1. I say, no thanks, doc. Lets see what xgeva brings to the table first. It's summer.
June-August 2013HAPX Herceptin Avastin Perjeta xgeva.
Sept - now - on chemo hold for calming tummy we hope. Markers stable for 2 months.
Nov 2013 - Herceptin-Perjeta-Avastin-Xgeva (collageneous colitis, which explains tummy probs, added Entocort)
December '13 BRAIN MRI ned in da head.
Jan 2014: CONTINUING on HAPX…
FEB 2014 PetCT clinical “impression”: 1. newbie nodule - SUV 1.5 right apical nodule, mildly hypermetabolic “suggestive” of worsening neoplastic lesion. 2. moderate worsening of the sternum – SUV 5.6 from 3.8
3. increasing sclerosis & decreasing activity of L1 met “suggests” mild healing. (SUV 9.4 v 12.1 in May ‘13)
4. scattered lung nodules, up to 5mm in size = stable, no increased activity
5. other small scattered sclerotic lesions, one in right iliac and one in thoracic vertebral body similar in appearance to L1 without PET activity and not clearly pathologic
APRIL 2014 - 6 YRS POST GAMMA ZAP, 7 YRS MBC & 18 YEARS FROM ORIGINAL DX!
October 2014: hold avastin, continue HPX
Feb 2015 Cancer you lost. NEDHEAD 7 years post gamma zap miracle, 8 years ST4, +19 yrs original diagnosis.
Continue HPX. Adding back Avastin
Nov 2015 pet/ct is mixed result. L1 SUV is worse. Continue Herceptin/avastin/xgeva. Might revisit Perjeta for L1. Meantime going for rads consult for L1
December 2015 - brain stable. Continue Herceptin, Perjeta, Avastin and xgeva.
Jan 2016: 5 days, 20 grays, Rads to L1 and continue on HAPX. I’m trying to "save" TDM1 for next line. Hope the rads work to quiet L1. Sciatic pain extraordinaire :((
Markers drop post rads.
2/24/16 HAP plus X - markers are down
SCIATIC PAIN DEAL BREAKER.
3/23/16 Laminectomy w/coflex implant L4/5. NO MORE SCIATIC PAIN!!! Healing.
APRIL 2016 - 9 YRS MBC
July 2016 - continue HAP plus Xgeva.
DEC 2016 - PETCT: mets to sternum, lungs, L1 still about the same in size and PET activity. Markers not bad. Not making changes if I don't need to. Herceptin/Perjeta/Avastin/Xgeva
APRIL 2017 10 YEARS MBC
December 2017 - Progression - gonna switch it up
FEB 2018 - Kadcyla 3 cycles ---->progression :(
MAY30th - bronchoscopy, w/foundation1 - her2 enriched
Aug 27, 2018 - start clinical trial ZW25
JAN 2019 - ZW25 seems to be keeping me stable
APRIL 2019 - ONE DOZEN YEARS LIVING METASTATIC
MAY 2019 - progression back on herceptin add xeloda
JUNE 2019 - "6 mos average survival" LMD & CNS new single brain met - one zap during 5 days true beam SBRT to cord met
10/30/19 - stable brain and cord. progression lungs and bones. washing out. applying for ds8201a w nivolumab. hope they take me.
12/27/19 - begin ds8401a w nivolumab. after 2nd cycle nodes melt away. after 3rd cycle chest scan shows Improvement, brain MRI shows improvement, resolved areas & nothing new. switch to plain ENHERTU. after 4th cycle, PETscan shows mostly resolved or improved results. Markers near normal. I'm stunned but grateful.
10/26/20 - June 2021 Tucatinib/xeloda/herceptin - stable ish.
SoCalGal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2007, 07:44 PM   #3
gdpawel
Senior Member
 
gdpawel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,080
Chemosensitivity Assay and HER2/neu Expression in Women with Breast Cancer

The ATP assay is one of three non proprietary assays. The others are the DISC and MTT (Oncologic In Vitro Chemoresponse Assays). All three are known as "cell-death" assays. Assays based on "cell-death" occur in the entire population of tumor cells, as opposed to only in a small fraction of the tumor cells occuring in "cell-growth" assays.

The one technique that stands out about the above study is the fact that they investigated whether the in vitro chemosensitivity response of "cell lines" derived from breast cancer patients (they cultured breast cancer "cell lines"). Cell-lines have proved worthless as models to predict the activity of drugs in cancer. An "established" cell-line is not reflective of the behavior of fresh "live" tumor cells in primary culture in the lab, much less in the patient. They have been a huge disappointment with respect to their ability to correctly model the disease-specific activity of new drugs for any cancers, much less in breast cancer.

It is important to culture "live" solid tumor specimens in conical polypropylene (a slippery material) which encourages tumor cells to remain in the form of three dimensional, floating clusters (their natural state). This increases the proportion of tumor cells relative to normal cells.

And selecting for tumor cells is very important for an assay like the ATP, which cannot discriminate between tumor cells and normal cells. It is chiefly used in situations where there are very pure population of tumor cells, but a very low cell yield. There are certain assay culture methods, like the DISC assay, that can get rid of the non-cancer cells before the end of the culture period. It would be more beneficial to utilize two or all three of the mentioned assays.

Dr. Ian Cree, with Queen Alexandra Hospital's Translational Oncology Research Centre in the UK, performed the first ever prospective, randomized clinical trial of physician's choice chemotherapy verus ATP assay-directed chemotherapy in non-surgically debulked, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. He presented it at the May, 2005 ASCO meeting in Orlando, Florida. The results were highly suggestive of an effect due to the assay and the most successful drug regimens used were nearly all developed using the assay.

Cree's lastest research uses his ATP-based cell culture assay to assess the expression of genes in dozens of fresh NSCLC tumor samples. Gene expression markers can actually be calibrated to provide information about chemo resistance and sensitivity.

Cree IA, Kurbacher CM, Lamont A, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of ATP-based tumor chemosensitivity assay-directed chemotherapy versus physicians choice in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian ancer. BMC Cancer. 2003; 3:19.
gdpawel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter