HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-27-2007, 05:17 PM   #1
michele u
Senior Member
 
michele u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Henderson, NE
Posts: 413
did anyone watch The early show today?

someone told me on the early show today some guy was talking about a new breakthrough with cancer. It sounds like it might be nanotechology. They inject nanoparticles of chemo onto gold and the gold/chemo seeps into the cancer cells. then they give a low radiation and it heats up the gold and kills the cancer cells. It was not a researcher either, just a retired man!! if anyone has the link let me know
__________________
Michele Ulmer

dx: August 2003 stage 3b 35 pos nodes ER/PR neg Her+
4 AC 12 weekly taxol
one year Herceptin in trial
35 rad tx
vaccine trial Seattle
NED
michele u is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2007, 05:48 PM   #2
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
I had reported this to the board after attending the Era of Hope b conference in 6/05

(since then Stanford scientists have done someting similar with gold nanotubes, rather than gold nanospheres):
Home > Publications > Press Releases > Archived Press Releases for 2005 > Press Release
Search Site:

U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command


June 9, 2005
LIGHT & SOUND JOIN FORCES TO IMPROVE BREAST CANCER IMAGING
Points of Contact:
Lynn Rudinsky phone 212/886-2200, email lrudinsky@cooneywaters.com
In Philadelphia 6/8 - 6/11
Pennsylvania Convention Center, 215-418-2155
Gail Whitehead, Public Affairs Coordinator, phone (301) 619-7783, email gail.whitehead@amedd.army.mil
Research Results from the "Era of Hope "Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program Meeting
PHILADELPHIA, June 9, 2005 - Finding breast cancer early improves the odds for successful treatment. Once a suspicious mass is detected, the diagnostic gold standard remains biopsy, an invasive procedure that produces discomfort, anxiety, and an exceedingly high 80% rate of negative findings, which translates into eight benign masses for every two confirmed cancers. At the "Era of Hope" meeting, researchers funded through the Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program will describe an array of technologies being developed to detect tiny cancers earlier and replace biopsy with a non-invasive tool that can differentiate benign from malignant growths. These include a hand-held imager designed for at-home use, gold-wrapped bits of silica that may serve dual duty for imaging and therapy, and tandem optics-ultrasound and optoacoustic systems.
Prototype Imager Holds Promise for At-home Breast Screening
A hand-held device in development may one day allow women to screen themselves for breast cancer in the privacy of their homes. The device, tentatively named "iFind," monitors the differences in blood oxygen ratios in growing cancers and normal tissues, reported researchers from the University of Pennsylvania. If it picks up potential early signs of breast cancer, it alerts the user with either a light or a vibration.
"It's important to know that this would be part of a breast exam, not a full diagnostic device," explained Britton Chance, Ph.D., emeritus professor of physics and radiology at the University of Pennsylvania Medical School and developer of the device. "It would provide an indication of early signs of breast cancer that need to be followed up by a doctor."
The device measures oxygenation rather than blood volume to detect hypermetabolism - the speedier growth rate of cancer cells. The prototype breast cancer detector performed with a positive predictive value of about 93%, which the researchers describe as a remarkably successful test for detecting breast cancer. Reliance on near-infrared light makes it a safe technology as well; women can use it as frequently as they wish. The study was conducted over a six-year period at two sites.
"This equipment gives women an opportunity to take charge of their own health, and it only requires minimal training," said Dr. Chance. "The device also has a longitudinal memory, so if something suspicious is flagged, the woman can bring the device with her to her doctor who will have results from every time it has been used."
In an informal, online survey of 325 women of all age groups and across all income levels conducted by the developers from a group of family, friends, acquaintances and others via word of mouth, 83% of respondents said they would be interested in a screening device they could use at home. Most of the women's concerns related to the reliability and sensitivity of the device and their ability to use it by themselves.
In addition to the hand-held imager, Dr. Chance is developing an imaging tool intended for use in a clinical setting rather than at home. The clinician's device produces crisp images with the aid of an injected molecular beacon called a nanodot - a bright fluorescer that lights up tumors. Both devices would be able to detect small initial cancers as well as recurrences.
Initial studies have evaluated the hand-held device for principles of detection appropriate for breast cancer. Its developers propose to begin testing both imaging devices in a year and a half in an ongoing study of women with an identified BRCA 1 or 2 genetic defect, which places them at substantially greater risk for developing breast cancer.
Gold-shelled Nanoparticles Selectively Find and Kill Cells Associated with Invasive Breast Cancer
Researchers at Rice University sent particles called nanoshells on a successful search-and-destroy mission for a protein linked to aggressive breast cancer - the first use of a single bio-imaging tool for both diagnosis and therapy in this disease. The nanoshells lit up cells that had high levels of HER2 protein, and the illuminated cells acted as beacons for lethal doses of laser-directed heat.
"If we can develop a single safe technology that identifies and treats cancer, it would have the potential to reduce side effects for patients and reduce costs for the health care system," said Naomi J. Halas, Ph.D., Stanley C. Moore Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering and professor of chemistry at Rice University in Houston.
Dr. Halas designed nanoshells in the 1990s. These gold-wrapped bits of silica, roughly 20 times smaller than a red blood cell, naturally accumulate inside malignant tumors. For this dual-purpose application, nanoshells were tailored for photothermal therapy, a process in which they convert near-infrared light (NIR) into heat that kills cancer cells without harming nearby healthy tissue.
The Rice team used two breast cancer cell lines: one that overexpressed HER2 and one that did not. One set of nanoshells was joined to HER2 so that it would seek out this biomarker. After incubating the cells with nanoshells, the researchers conducted the imaging portion of the study with NIR to illuminate cells showing high HER2 levels.
"At that point, all we have to do for treatment is turn up the laser power, shine the light for a few minutes, then do viability stains that show different colors for live and dead cells," Dr. Halas explained. Nanoshells can be manipulated to scatter or absorb light, and in this case, it was both. Researchers employed a scatter signal for the imaging and an absorption signal for the photothermal therapy.
The results of this experiment, demonstrating that a single particle can be designed for sequential imaging and therapy, appeared in April 2005 issue of Nano Letters, a publication of the American Chemical Society. As a next step, Dr. Halas and her colleagues plan to follow a similar procedure in a mouse model. These nanoshell functions should be applicable to most soft tissue cancers.
Marriage of Near-Infrared Light and Sound Waves May Help Detect Very Early Breast Cancer
By combining features of near-infrared light and sound waves, a new imaging technology demonstrates the potential to find breast cancers when they are very small - an early stage when the cells are genetically altered but the malignant changes are not detectable by other methods. The Laser Optoacoustic Imaging System (LOIS) uses sound waves to sharpen the resolution of optical images and give clinicians a better view of subtle contrasts in subsurface structures that indicate cancer.
"Contrast and resolution are interrelated issues," explained Alexander Oraevsky, Ph.D., vice president for research and development at Fairway Medical Technologies, Inc. in Houston, TX. "Near-infrared light penetrates tissue deep enough to show the difference between cancer and benign areas, but image resolution is limited because light scatters strongly in tissue. This can smear the contrast, making a small tumor look large, featureless and faint, or even invisible. We solve this problem by converting the light into acoustic waves, so it's the sound waves that are detected, not photons from light."
In this process, light penetrates tissue to a significant depth and is absorbed preferentially by tumors. As the light warms the tumors slightly, the heat builds pressure, which the tumor cannot contain. This pressure becomes an acoustic wave that propagates out as ultrasound, where it is picked up with only minimal scattering. Most detectors discern only a narrow range of frequencies. The LOIS ultrawide band transducers detect acoustic pulses at all frequencies simultaneously.
To demonstrate feasibility, Fairway scientists have been testing LOIS in three systems. In the first, they used a "phantom," a collagen gel structure that resembles breast tissue. Embedded in the phantom was an object with greater absorption capability to approximate a tumor. Phantoms allow scientists to predict system response and calibrate the equipment. Next, they studied LOIS in mastectomy tissues to confirm that real tissues and the phantom provided similar optoacoustic responses. Now they are conducting clinical studies with women already known to have suspicious breast lesions.
"Our goals are to prove that LOIS can detect the same tumors found with other imaging modalities but with greater contrast; and then to see whether it can distinguish cancer from benign masses non-invasively, from imaging alone," said Dr. Oraevsky.
Of the 24 patients examined to date, LOIS detected more than 95% of the tumors. The researchers are still working on the differential diagnosis aspect of the technology. Eventually, they hope to conduct a large clinical trial to define the technology's false-positive and false-negative rates for both detection and diagnosis.
"We think we can refine LOIS to be not only a more sensitive technology for early detection of breast cancer but one that provides a true differential diagnosis. If we could reduce the number of benign biopsies, that would be a significant breakthrough," Dr. Oraevsky said.
In a related project, Fairway scientists are exploring gold nanorods as a contrast agent to further clarify images of very early tumors. "Every imaging technology uses a contrast agent for a variety of applications, though not necessarily for breast imaging, and gold nanorods have the potential to be a good agent for X-ray as well as for LOIS," Dr. Oraevsky commented.
The nanorods are similar to gold nanoshells, but have a greater optical absorption coefficient, which means they deliver a stronger signal. For example, 10 nanoshells and one nanorod of equal volume have equal absorption and signaling capability. This matters, because of the limited number of nanoparticles that can be delivered to a tumor. Consequently, the more signal they can produce, the better. Using a mouse model of human breast cancer, the researchers plan to determine optimal ways to deliver the nanorods to the tumors and then to visualize them with LOIS.
Dual Role for Optical Tomography in Advanced Disease: Diagnose Early-Stage Breast Cancer, Predict Treatment Response
Combining optical tomography (OT) with commonly used imaging overcomes important limitations of both technologies and shows both diagnostic and prognostic potential in breast cancer, according to a University of Connecticut study. In more than 100 women with small breast lesions located precisely by ultrasound after a mammogram, OT distinguished benign from malignant masses with a high degree of accuracy. Preliminary results also suggest that once another type of imaging has pinpointed a tumor, OT may predict response to chemotherapy in advanced-stage disease.
"Researchers in the optical community have been trying to use OT for cancer detection and diagnosis, but infrared light scatters when it passes through soft tissue, making it difficult to spot a small tumor. Using other imaging techniques to find lesions and OT to characterize them has great potential to improve diagnosis in early-stage breast cancer," said Quing Zhu, Ph.D., an associate professor of bioengineering at the University of Connecticut in Storrs.
In the diagnostic component of the study, images created via OT were able to distinguish early-stage cancers from benign lesions by showing which ones featured high hemoglobin concentrations, which indicate the formation of new blood vessels that feed malignancies. To create these images, researchers took multiple measurements of light transmitted through the target site, which produced massive data sets that were then translated into images by computer software developed by Dr. Zhu's team.
Dr. Zhu acknowledges that this new approach, which she calls "optical tomography with ultrasound guidance," will not replace mammograms. Instead, she hopes it can improve the ability to characterize a suspicious breast mass detected by mammography and thus spare many women the distress and discomfort of a biopsy that turns out to be negative.
The researchers also are investigating how OT can monitor changes in the body after chemotherapy to predict treatment response in women with advanced breast cancer. This part of the study focuses on two parameters: blood volume as a marker of angiogenesis (formation of tumor-supplying new blood vessels) and blood oxygenation. Other investigators have reported that resistance to cancer drugs is related to local deoxygenation of blood.
"In the small group of patients monitored so far, the technology appears to predict response during the early treatment cycles," Dr. Zhu reported. "This could help clinicians know pretty quickly whether or not a tumor is shrinking, so they can switch to another therapy in a timeframe that might make a difference. Palpation and non-functional imaging tools like mammography and ultrasound can't do that."
Because it relies on non-ionizing infrared light, OT can be repeated frequently for monitoring purposes without the potential health risks of medical imaging methods that involve radiation or contrast dyes. Dr. Zhu cautions, however, that her group has monitored only eight patients. Larger studies are needed to confirm the value of OT in predicting response to treatment and thus to improve clinicians' ability to tailor breast cancer therapies to individual patients.

"Era of Hope" is a forum for the presentation of research supported by the U.S. Department of Defense's Breast Cancer Research Program (BCRP)
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2007, 07:29 PM   #3
Rupali
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 148
Hi Michele,
How have u been doing on Tykerb
Cheers
Rupali
Rupali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2007, 07:57 PM   #4
CLTann
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 476
The June 2005 article is indeed very exciting. Yet we haven't heard more about the nano technology being successful. Anyone has more late news please post them for us to see.
__________________
Ann

Stage 1 dx Sept 05
ER/PR positive HER2 +++ Grade 3
Invasive carcinoma 1 cm, no node involvement
Mastec Sept 05
Annual scans all negative, Oct 06
Postmenopause. Arimidex only since Sept 06, bone or muscle ache after 3 month
Off Arimidex, change to Femara 1/12-07, ache stopped
Sept 07 all tests negative, pass 2 year mark
Feb 08 continue doing well.
Sep 09 four year NED still on Femara.
CLTann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2007, 09:15 PM   #5
Barbara2
Senior Member
 
Barbara2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Dakota.
Posts: 621
"Fascinating" Possible Cancer Treatment

Here's the link...


http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/earl...in500202.shtml
__________________
Blessings and Peace,
Barbara

DX Oct 02 @ age 52 Stage 2B Grade 3 Mastectomy
"at least" 4.5 cm IDC 1+node ER+61% /PR-
Assiciated Intraductual component with Comedo Necrosis
Her2+ FISH8.6 IHC 2+
5 1/2 CEF Arimidex
Celebrex 400mg daily for 13 months
Prophylactic mastectomy
Estradiol #: 13
PTEN positive, "late" Herceptin (26 months after chemo)
Oct 05: Actonel for osteopenia from Arimidex.
May 08: Replaced Actonel with Zometa . Taking every 6
months.

Accepting the gift of life, I give thanks for it and live it in fullness.
Barbara2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 12:09 AM   #6
Chelee
Senior Member
 
Chelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern, CA
Posts: 2,511
I had a doctors appt this morning and I had heard this was going to be on the *Early Morning Show* so I taped it. Now that Barbara posted the link I don't have to fast forward through the two hr show to find that segment. I have to admit...that sounds pretty amazing. I wish they were further along in testing this method...verses two yrs away from testing on humans. But Its still pretty exciting. Sounds very encouraging.

Chelee
__________________
DX: 12-20-05 - Stage IIIA, Her2/Neu, 3+++,Er & Pr weakly positive, 5 of 16 pos nodes.
Rt. MRM on 1-3-06 -- No Rads due to compromised lungs.
Chemo started 2-7-06 -- TCH - - Finished 6-12-06
Finished yr of wkly herceptin 3-19-07
3-15-07 Lt side prophylactic simple mastectomy. -- Ooph 4-05-07
9-21-09 PET/CT "Recurrence" to Rt. axllia, Rt. femur, ilium. Possible Sacrum & liver? Now stage IV.
9-28-09 Loading dose of Herceptin & started Zometa
9-29-09 Power Port Placement
10-24-09 Mass 6.4 x 4.7 cm on Rt. femur head.
11-19-09 RT. Femur surgery - Rod placed
12-7-09 Navelbine added to Herceptin/Zometa.
3-23-10 Ten days of rads to RT femur. Completed.
4-05-10 Quit Navelbine--Herceptin/Zometa alone.
5-4-10 Appt. with Dr. Slamon to see what is next? Waiting on FISH results from femur biopsy.
Results to FISH was unsuccessful--this happens less then 2% of the time.
7-7-10 Recurrence to RT axilla again. Back to UCLA for options.
Chelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2007, 06:17 AM   #7
mts
Senior Member
 
mts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 503
I served as a consumer reviewer at the 2006 Congressionally Directed Medical Research Panel (CDMRP) last year and this year for the Dept of Defense (DOD). We (myself, two other consumer reviewers and 15 scientists) reviewed many proposals in breast imaging and many of them were similar to the research program talked about in Lani's post.
A hand held device to be used at home was one that all scientists were thrilled to hear about ...

There are many well informed, bright women on this board- I would encourage all of you to try to get on this panel. The DOD has millions in funding that are used for the "leap frog", high risk research proposals. From what I gathered, the National Institutes of Health usually funds research that is the next "obvious step" in research... Between the two funding mechanisms, there is quite a bit of research going on.

The DOD provides research funding for breast cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer and other diseases. I would encourage you all to look under the DOD website and find the CDMRP program.

Maria
mts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2013, 03:57 PM   #8
norkdo
Senior Member
 
norkdo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: ottawa canada
Posts: 367
Re: did anyone watch The early show today?

God bless you Mts, and Lani for this.
__________________
fall 2008: mammo of rt breast worrisome so am asked to redo mammo and have ultrasound of rt breast.I delay it til january 2009 and the results are "no cancer in rt breast. phew."
found plum sized lump in right breast the day before my dad died: April 17th 2011. saw it in mirror, while i was wearing a top, examining my figure after losing 10 lbs on dr. bernstein diet.
diagnosed may 10 2011

mast/lymphectomy: june 7 2011, 5/20 cancerous nodes. stage 3a before radiation oncologist during our first mtg on july 15th says he found cancer on the lymph node of my breast bone. Now stage 3b.
her2+++, EN-, PN-. Rt brst tumors:3 at onset, 4.5 cm was the big one
chemos: 3fec's followed by 3 taxotere, total of 18 wks chemo. sept: halfway thru chemo the mastectomy scar decides to open and ooze pus. (not healed before chemo) eventually with canasten powder sent by friend in ny (illegal in canada) it heals.
radiations:although scheduled to begin 25 january 2012, I am so terrified by it (rads cause other cancers) I don't start til february, miss a bunch, reschedule them all and finally finish 35 rads mid april. reason for 7 extra atop the 28 scheduled is that when i first met my rads oncologist he said he saw a tumor on the lymph node of my breastbone. extra 7 are special kind of beam used for that lymphnode. rads onc tells me nobody ever took so long to do rads so he cannot speak for effectiveness. trials had been done only on consecutive days so......we'll see.....
10 mos of herceptin started 6 wks into chemo. canadian onc says 10 mos is just as effective as the full yr recommended by dr. slamon......so we'll see..completed july 2012.
Sept 18 2012: reconstruction and 3 drains. fails. i wear antibiotic pouch on my job for two months and have 60 consecutive days visiting a nursing centre where they apply burn victims' silver paper and clean the oozing infection daily. silicone leaks out daily. plastic surgeon in caribbean. emergency dept wont remove "his" work. He finally appears and orders me in into an emergency removal of implant. I make him promise no drains and I get my way. No infection as a result. Chest looks like a map of Brazil. Had a perfectly good left breast on Sept 17th but surgeon wanted to "save another woman an operation" ? so he had crashed two operations together on my left breast, foregoing the intermediary operation where you install an expander. the first surgeon a year earlier had flat out refused to waste five hours on his feet taking both boobs. flat out refusal. between the canadian health system saving money and both these asses, I got screwed. who knows when i can next get enough time off work (i work for myself and have no substitute when my husband is on contract) to get boobs again. arrrgh.


I have a blog where I document this trip and vent.
www.nora'scancerblog.blogspot.com . I stopped the blog before radiation. I think the steroids made me more angry and depressed and i just hated reading it anymore
norkdo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 01:21 AM   #9
Jackie07
Senior Member
 
Jackie07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: "Love never fails."
Posts: 5,808
Re: did anyone watch The early show today?

Abstract of a recent article on nanotechnology and breast cancer treatment:

J Healthc Eng. 2013;4(1):67-86. doi: 10.1260/2040-2295.4.1.67.

Perspectives of nanotechnology in minimally invasive therapy of breast cancer.

Yang Y, Wang H. Source Chemical Biology and Biomedical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA. yyang8@stevens.edu

Abstract
Breast cancer, the most common type of cancer among women in the western world, affects approximately one out of every eight women over their lifetime. In recognition of the high invasiveness of surgical excision and severe side effects of chemical and radiation therapies, increasing efforts are made to seek minimally invasive modalities with fewer side effects.

Nanoparticles (<100 nm in size) have shown promising capabilities for delivering targeted therapeutic drugs to cancer cells and confining the treatment mainly within tumors.

Additionally, some nanoparticles exhibit distinct properties, such as conversion of photonic energy into heat, and these properties enable eradication of cancer cells.

In this review, current utilization of nanostructures for cancer therapy, especially in minimally invasive therapy, is summarized with a particular interest in breast cancer.
__________________
Jackie07
http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2011/06/doctors-letter-patient-newly-diagnosed-cancer.html
http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/MultiMedi...=114&trackID=2

NICU 4.4 LB
Erythema Nodosum 85
Life-long Central Neurocytoma 4x5x6.5 cm 23 hrs 62090 semi-coma 10 d PT OT ST 30 d
3 Infertility tmts 99 > 3 u. fibroids > Pills
CN 3 GKRS 52301
IDC 1.2 cm Her2 +++ ER 5% R. Lmptmy SLNB+1 71703 6 FEC 33 R Tamoxifen
Recc IIB 2.5 cm Bi-L Mast 61407 2/9 nds PET
6 TCH Cellulitis - Lymphedema - compression sleeve & glove
H w x 4 MUGA 51 D, J 49 M
Diastasis recti
Tamoxifen B. scan
Irrtbl bowel 1'09
Colonoscopy 313
BRCA1 V1247I
hptc hemangioma
Vertigo
GI - > yogurt
hysterectomy/oophorectomy 011410
Exemestane 25 mg tab 102912 ~ 101016 stopped due to r. hip/l.thigh pain after long walk
DEXA 1/13
1-2016 lesions in liver largest 9mm & 1.3 cm onco. says not cancer.
3-11 Appendectomy - visually O.K., a lot of puss. Final path result - not cancer.
Start Vitamin D3 and Calcium supplement (600mg x2)
10-10 Stopped Exemestane due to r. hip/l.thigh pain OKed by Onco 11-08-2016
7-23-2018 9 mm groundglass nodule within the right lower lobe with indolent behavior. Due to possible adenocarcinoma, Recommend annual surveilence.
7-10-2019 CT to check lung nodule.
1-10-2020 8mm stable nodule on R Lung, two 6mm new ones on L Lung, a possible lymph node involvement in inter fissule.
"I WANT TO BE AN OUTRAGEOUS OLD WOMAN WHO NEVER GETS CALLED AN OLD LADY. I WANT TO GET SHARP EDGED & EARTH COLORED, TILL I FADE AWAY FROM PURE JOY." Irene from Tampa

Advocacy is a passion .. not a pastime - Joe
Jackie07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter