HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-07-2015, 11:54 AM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
Lightbulb new immunotherapy approach--letting up on the brake while stepping on the accelerator

trials to start in comabination with herceptin, per the article

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/...0QC0CZ20150807

Health | Fri Aug 7, 2015 1:25pm EDT Related: HEALTH

Pfizer, Bristol revive cancer drugs that rev up immune system
NEW YORK | BY BILL BERKROT

The Pfizer logo is seen at their world headquarters in New York April 28, 2014. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

REUTERS/ANDREW KELLY
Some of the most heralded new cancer drugs fight the disease by removing brakes on the immune system. Now a few leading drugmakers are paying attention to a second, opposing force: medicines that accelerate the immune system's attack.

Pfizer Inc, which is lagging rivals in the lucrative field of cancer immunotherapies, has been the first to report early data of an "accelerator" treatment that targets a protein called 4-1BB. It has at least five other Phase I studies underway or in planning stages in solid tumor cancers and lymphomas, which are blood cancers.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co is hot on Pfizer's heels with a handful of early-stage trials of its own 4-1BB antibody. Others, including Johnson & Johnson and AbbVie Inc are doing early testing of their antibodies prior to starting human trials, company executives and researchers told Reuters.

"What they have shown are some pretty phenomenal responses in patients ... where you would not expect the drug to work very well" because the patients had stopped responding to any available treatments, said Dr. Holbrook Kohrt, a researcher from Stanford University Cancer Institute, referring to results from a small trial of Pfizer's treatment in patients whose lymphoma had progressed after they received several other therapies.

4-1BB, also known as CD137, and its connection to the immune system was identified more than 20 years ago by scientists at the University of California San Diego. The approach was largely abandoned in 2008 after early clinical trials of a Bristol therapy showed dangerous signs of liver damage.

Scientists eventually realized that significantly lower doses of a 4-1BB antibody, given at the right time, could achieve the desired anti-cancer effect without the toxicity.

They now believe immune system accelerator therapies could work for many types of cancers, bolstering an arsenal of new medications that are changing the field of oncology.

Bristol and Merck & Co have debuted potent drugs that work by blocking a protein known as PD-1, which tumors use to evade detection by the immune system. Doctors are seeing some patients live for years with diseases like advanced melanoma, which had nearly always meant death within months.

The expensive treatments are being tested in combination with many other medicines to help them work for a wider group of patients, and perhaps further improve the duration of responses. The immuno-oncology market could reach $40 billion by 2025, according to Leerink Partners.

TINY GAS PEDALS

When T-cells and "natural killer" cells in the body's immune system identify cancer, the 4-1BB protein appears on their surfaces, which researchers have likened to tiny gas pedals. They are using existing cancer therapies, such as Roche's Rituxan, to help activate the immune system, then add the new experimental treatment, which locks onto the 4-1BB protein, stepping on the gas to intensify the cells’ attack.

In the study of Pfizer's antibody in 38 patients with advanced lymphomas, nearly 40 percent of those with follicular lymphoma and a third of those with mantle cell lymphoma saw a reduction in cancer with no serious side effects.

One of Kohrt’s follicular lymphoma patients received two months of the Pfizer treatment and has been cancer free for more than three years. Her prior prognosis was about six months to a year to live.

John Lin, Pfizer's head of immunotherapy, said it began human trials with a very small dose. "The safety profile looks to be excellent," he said. "That came as a surprise to some people in the field who are familiar with 4-1BB, because in the past this target looked a little bit dangerous."

The early success led Stanford researchers, including Kohrt, to test other existing treatments with the new accelerator therapies from Pfizer and Bristol. For example, they plan to test Pfizer's drug with Roche's Herceptin in breast cancer, and Bristol's 4-1BB therapy urelumab with Eli Lilly and Co's Erbitux in colon and head and neck cancers.

BRISTOL COMES BACK

Bristol's plans for urelumab also show how cancer experts are overcoming their previous reluctance. The company halted human testing of the therapy from 2008 to 2011 after seeing an unusually high rate of severe and potentially fatal hepatitis in a melanoma study.

Bristol is enrolling patients in five Phase I studies and planning a sixth for urelumab against multiple myeloma, lymphomas and solid tumor cancers in combination with other therapies, including its PD-1 drug Opdivo.

Pfizer said it will test its 4-1BB drug in conjunction with an immunotherapy from Japan's Kyowa Hakko Kirin and in combination with Merck's PD-1 drug Keytruda, both in solid tumor cancers, with other trials planned.

"This is an unbelievably competitive market. With 4-1BB they have an interesting opportunity," Leerink Partners analyst Seamus Fernandez said of Pfizer.

The pharma landscape is littered with drugs that looked promising early only to fail when larger trials turned up safety problems or disappointing efficacy, and that could happen with 4-1BB therapies. But Phase I cancer trials have become better predictors of future results, experts say, as researchers employ their growing understanding of immunology and human genetics.

Health regulators have also accelerated their review of medicines they deem to be important advances, particularly in cancer. In many cases, they have allowed drugmakers to move from Phase I directly into pivotal trials that can be used to seek approval, cutting years off the development process.

Immunotherapy pioneer Dr. Lieping Chen, who did early work for Bristol-Myers, in 2002 published the first paper showing a 4-1BB antibody could stimulate a powerful anti-cancer attack.

"This is probably going to be the next big one," said Chen, who now works at Yale Cancer Center. "4-1BB was always one of my favorites," Chen said, based on his observation of a 4-1BB antibody's ability to shrink tumors in mice.

Chen was the first to identify PD-L1, a target related to PD-1 for which Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and others are developing treatments. He said several companies looking to develop 4-1BB antibodies, including Pfizer, have reached out to him in an advisory capacity.

"Personally, I'm happy this field has finally come back," he said of immuno-oncology. "Now it's almost overheated. Things are being tested at amazing speed."

(Reporting by Bill Berkrot. Editing by Michele Gershberg and John Pickering.)
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2015, 04:40 AM   #2
Mtngrl
Senior Member
 
Mtngrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,427
Re: new immunotherapy approach--letting up on the brake while stepping on the acceler

This is exciting news, indeed!
__________________
Amy
_____________________________
4/19/11 Diagnosed invasive ductal carcinoma in left breast; 2.3 cm tumor, 1 axillary lymph node, weakly ER+, HER2+++
4/29/11 CT scan shows suspicious lesions on liver and lungs
5/17/11 liver biopsy
5/24/11 liver met confirmed--Stage IV at diagnosis
5/27/11 Begin weekly Taxol & Herceptin for 3 months (standard of care at the time of my DX)
7/18/11 Switch to weekly Abraxane & Herceptin due to Taxol allergy
8/29/11 CT scan shows no new lesions & old lesions shrinking
9/27/11 Finish Abraxane. Start Herceptin every 3 weeks. Begin taking Arimidex
10/17/11--Brain MRI--No Brain mets
12/5/11 PET scan--Almost NED
5/15/12 PET scan shows progression-breast/chest/spine (one vertebra)
5/22/12 Stop taking Arimidex; stay on Herceptin
6/11/12 Started Tykerb and Herceptin on clinical trial (w/no chemo)
9/24/12 CT scan--No new mets. Everything stable.
3/11/13 CT Scan--two small new possible mets and odd looking area in left lung getting larger.
4/2/13--Biopsy of suspicious area in lower left lung. Mets to lung confirmed.
4/30/13 Begin Kadcyla/TDM-1
8/16/13 PET scan "mixed," with some areas of increased uptake, but also some definite improvement, so I'll stay on TDM-1/Kadcyla.
11/11/13 Finally get hormone receptor results from lung biopsy of 4/2/13. My cancer is no longer ER positive.
11/13/13 PET scan mixed results again. We're calling it "stable." Problems breathing on exertion.
2/18/14 PET scan shows a new lesion and newly active lymph node in chest, other progression. Bye bye TDM-1.
2/28/14 Begin Herceptin/Perjeta every 3 weeks.
6/8/14 PET "mixed," with no new lesions, and everything but lower lungs improving. My breathing is better.
8/18/14 PET "mixed" again. Upper lungs & one spine met stable, lower lungs less FDG avid, original tumor more avid, one lymph node in mediastinum more avid.
9/1/14 Begin taking Xeloda one week on, one week off. Will also stay on Herceptin and Perjeta every three weeks.
12/11/14 PET Scan--no new lesions, and everything looks better than it did.
3/20/15 PET Scan--no new lesions, but lower lung lesions larger and a bit more avid.
4/13/15 Increasing Xeloda dose to 10 days on, one week off.
7/1/15 Scan "mixed" again, but suggests continuing progression. Stop Xeloda. Substitute Abraxane every 3 weeks starting 7/13.
10/28/15 PET scan shows dramatic improvement everywhere. All lesions except lower lungs have resolved; lower lungs noticeably improved.
12/18/15 Last Abraxane. Continue on Herceptin and Perjeta alone beginning 1/8/16.
1/27/16 PET scan shows cancer is stable.
5/11/16 PET scan shows uptake in some areas that were resolved on the last two scans.
6/3/16 Begin Kadcyla and Tykerb combination
6/5 - 6/23 Horrible diarrhea from K&T together. Got pneumonia.
7/15/16 Begin Kadcyla only every 3 weeks.
9/6/16 Begin radiation therapy on right lung lesion that caused the pneumonia.
10/3/16 Last of 12 radiation treatments to right lung.
11/4/16 Huffing and puffing, low O2, high heart rate, on tiniest bit of exertion. Diagnosed as radiation pneumonitis. Treated with Prednisone.
11/11/16 PET scan shows significant improvement to radiated part of right lung BUT a bunch of new lung lesions, and the bone met is getting worse.
11/22/16 Begin Eribulin and Herceptin. H every 3 weeks. E two weeks on, one week off.
3/6/17 Scan shows progression in lungs. Bone met a little better.
3/23/17 Lung biopsy. Tumor sampled is ER-, PR+ (5%), HER2+++. Getting Herceptin and Perjeta as a maintenance treatment.
5/31/17 Port placement
6/1/17 Start Navelbine & Tykerb
Mtngrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2015, 03:39 PM   #3
agness
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 285
Re: new immunotherapy approach--letting up on the brake while stepping on the acceler

It is ironic that chemo depletes the immune system function and that liver dysfunction is unaddressed in current standard of care practices.

I successfully boosted WBC production during chemo using Chinese herbs and avoided using Neulasta. I also worked on boosting my poor magnesium level which is key to liver detox -- even as they gave me Carboplatin which depletes the body further of magnesium (I read the prescribing info). It took a lot of work to try to restore my depleted body as I went through treatment and Im grateful to my alternative health providers who kept me healthy during treatment.

I shudder when I hear of medical oncologists ignoring patients' nutritional status at time of diagnosis (my blood panel looked great until you looked at my ferritin, zinc, magnesium, D3 and copper levels). I've heard MOs say eat whatever you like during treatment, or worse telling folks not to take probiotics during treatment -- chemo is way worse for your body than sntibiotics. It's no wonder some patients almost die during treatment.

BTW, I also question the new "big data" cancer project that was announced at ASCO in June this year. Garbage in means garbage out. If they aren't looking at patients'
Nutritional and hormonal status at time if diagnosis and after treatment then they are never going to figure out how to actually heal people of their systemic disease.
__________________
  • Dx 2/14 3b HER2+/HR- left breast, left axilla, internal mammary node (behind breast bone). Neoadjuvant TCHP 3/14-7/2. PCR 8/14 LX and SND. 10/21-12/9 Proton therapy to chest wall.
  • Dx 7/20/15 cerebellar met 3.5x5cm HER2+/HR-/GATA3+ 7/23/15 Craniotomy.
  • 7/29/15 bone scan clear. 8/3/15 PET clean scan. LINAC SRS (5 fractions) Sept 2015. 9/17/15 CSF NED, 9/24/15 CSF NED, 11/2/15 CSF NED.
  • 10/27/15 atypical uptake in right cerebellum - inflammation?
  • 12/1/15 Leptomeningeal dx. Starting IT Herceptin.
  • 1/16 - 16 fractions of tomotherapy to cerebellum, break of IT Herceptin during rads, resume at 100 mg weekly
  • 3/2016 - stable scan
  • 5/2016 stable scan
  • 7/2016 pseudoprogression?
  • 9/2016 more LM, start new chemo protocol and IV therapy treatment with HBOT
  • 11/2016 Cyberknife to temporal lobe, HBOT just prior
  • 12/2016 - lesions starting to show shrinkage
  • 8/2017 - Stable since Dec 2016. Temporal lobe lesion gone.
  • Using TCM, naturopathic oncology, physical therapy, chiro, massage, medical qigong, and energetic healing modalities in tandem. Stops at nothing.
  • Mother of 2 boys - ages 7 and 10 (8/2017) and a lovely partner with lots to live for.
agness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2015, 05:11 PM   #4
Juls
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 563
Re: new immunotherapy approach--letting up on the brake while stepping on the acceler

Great news Lani.

Agness - Have to agree with you. Don't think enough attention paid to blood panels, nutrition, hormonal status etc. I have been given very little advice or info over last 2 1/2 years. In fact most of my info and reassurance has come from this site. I am on a trial of perjeta and it would have been so easy for the Hospital to take further info from us. They give us a form to complete with questions like "do you feel like a woman" etc but don't ask pertinent questions about lifestyle, diet etc. Seems like a missed opportunity to me!
Juls is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter