HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-30-2012, 10:30 PM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
Thumbs up balancing herceptin's survival benefit vs cardiac toxicity (with STATISTICS)

Balancing Trastuzumab's Survival Benefits and Heart Risks for Women with Breast Cancer

Adding trastuzumab (trade name Herceptin) to the treatment offered to women who have HER2-positive breast cancer, significantly increases the chance of life being prolonged, and reduces the chance of tumors reappearing once therapy stops. This is important, because about one-fifth of women who develop early breast cancer have HER2-positive tumors that, if untreated, are associated with a worse outlook than HER2-negative tumors. At the same time, however, women given trastuzumab have a higher risk of experiencing problems with their heart. These findings are the key conclusions of a systematic review published in The Cochrane Library.

Breast cancer is the most common diagnosed cancer in women. There are different types of breast cancer cells, but one feature is whether the tumor’s cells produce excess quantities of a particular protein called the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Cells which do are known as HER2-positive, while those with normal production are referred to as HER2-negative. Trastuzumab is a new-generation antibody based medicine that blocks the receptor and stops it triggering the excessive cell growth that causes tumors.

To provide clinicians and patients with accurate evidence of trastuzumab's harms and benefits, a team of researchers based in Milan and Modena, Italy, were keen to study available clinical trial data. They identified eight trials that involved 11,991 women with HER2-positive operable breast cancer who had been assigned randomly either to receive trastuzumab or not, in addition to other treatments. Women were followed by clinicians for several years (three on average).

The overall finding was that breast cancer mortality was reduced by one-third, but the risk of heart toxicity went up five times for women receiving trastuzumab compared with women receiving standard therapy alone.

If 1000 women were given standard therapy with no trastuzumab then after three years about 900 would survive, but if 1000 women were treated with standard chemotherapy and trastuzumab for one year, about 933 would survive.

"This means that for every 1000 women treated with trastuzumab, 33 more women will have their lives prolonged," says lead researcher Lorenzo Moja who works in the Department of Public Health at the University of Milan. In addition, about 95 more women will remain disease-free once therapy has stopped.

However, the study showed that the treatment isn't free of problems. About 26 in 1000 women taking trastuzumab experienced serious heart toxicity. This is 21 more than the chemotherapy alone group.

"These heart toxicities are often reversible if the treatment is stopped straight away," says Moja.

The researchers conclude that in women at higher risk of recurrence and with no signs of a weak heart, trastuzumab offers far more benefits than risks.

The balance of risks to benefits is less clear and must be carefully evaluated in women at lower risk of recurrence, for example if they only have a small tumor, or those who are at increased risk for cardiac complications. "The oncologist should share the decision with the patient, after careful consideration of the risks and benefits," says Roberto D'Amico, senior scientist at the Clinical Trial Unit of the Department of Oncology of the University of Modena.

SOURCE:
The Cochrane Library, April 2012
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2012, 05:46 AM   #2
Jean
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,154
Re: balancing herceptin's survival benefit vs cardiac toxicity (with STATISTICS)

Lani,
As always, thank you for this post as so many new members who join us are greatly concerned as they learn and glean information on Her2 breast cancer. It is overwhelming between hearing ones dx. and making life altering decisions.

Keeping in mind that women at higher risk of recurrence and in good health without signs of a weak heart, herceptin offers more benefits than risks.

Since most treatment decisions are based on results of clinical trials and studies...I am wondering was this trial done on patients who had A/C chemo?
Since we now know that A/C and herceptin has the the higher risk, especially when given together (which dr. are not doing anymore) A/C is given first than herceptin after.

In the study that Dr. Salmon did on TCH / v/ A/C that trial study had no heart issues with the TCH arm.

jean
__________________
Stage 1, Grade 1, 3/30/05
Lumpectomy 4/15/05 - 6MM IDC
Node Neg. (Sentinel node)
ER+ 90% / PR-, Her2+++ by FISH
Ki-67 40%
Arimidex 5/05
Radiation 32 trt, 5/30/05
Oncotype DX test 4/17/06, 31% high risk
TOPO 11 neg. 4/06
Stopped Arimidex 5/06
TCH 5/06, 6 treatments
Herceptin 5/06 - for 1 yr.
9/06 Completed chemo
Started Femara Sept. 2006

Last edited by Jean; 05-01-2012 at 05:51 AM..
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter