HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-03-2007, 05:41 AM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
loss of a single (of two copies) of a tumor suppressor gene enough to flip bc "switch

Tumor suppressor tips the balance in breast cancer development

MedWire News: Loss of the tumor suppressor gene Tip60 is associated with the development of aggressive breast tumors, a discovery that could have important implications for how certain breast cancers are treated in the future, reveals an international team of researchers.

"We suggest that this is because critical levels of Tip60 are required for mounting an oncogene-induced DNA-damage response (DDR) in incipient tumor cells, the failure of which might synergize with p53 mutation towards tumor progression," the researchers explain

Chiara Gorrini (European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy) and colleagues found that Tip60 messenger (m)RNA levels were significantly reduced in 21 of 52 ductal breast carcinomas and 17 of 20 high-grade tumors, relative to matched normal tissue.

The researchers also measured TIP60 protein in an additional 179 breast cancers using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. In 129 (72%) cases there was no TIP60 protein in the cell nucleus, whereas in normal breast tissue most of the protein was localized in the cell nucleus.

The proportion of cancers lacking nuclear TIP60 protein was even higher in aggressive cancers, with over 70% of grade 2, and over 90% of grade 3 tumors negative for TIP60.

Reporting their findings in the journal Nature, the researchers suggest that defects in the Tip60 gene appear at an early stage of breast cancer development and predispose women to aggressive tumors.

Co-author Tim Crook (Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, London, UK) commented: "The identification of Tip60's role in breast cancer is a step towards predicting the aggressiveness of the disease and then individualizing chemotherapy for women."

He added: "If we can transfer this knowledge to the clinic, it could have dramatic effects."

The study also found that, unlike most tumor suppressors, the Tip60 gene only needs to have one copy altered to stop functioning properly. The researchers suggest that critical levels of TIP60 are required for it to perform its vital role in DDR in incipient tumor cells.

Antonia Dean, a Clinical Nurse Specialist from the UK charity Breast Cancer Care, emphasized the need for further studies to fully determine how these findings can be translated into practical benefits for people with breast cancer.



Nature 2007; 488: 1063-1067

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture06055.html
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 05:48 AM   #2
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
I quickly perused fully article--grade II and III bc mentioned

but her2 not mentioned (?not tested)
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 06:09 AM   #3
TSund
Senior Member
 
TSund's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DFW area (TX)
Posts: 431
Is this factor testable? Is it included in the oncogene test?
__________________
Terri, spouse of Ruth, Dallas/Ft. Worth area
Ruth dx 05/01/07 (age 50) Filipino
multifocal, several tumors .5 -2.5 cm, large area
Breast MRI showed 2 enlarged nodes, not palpable
100%ER+, 95%PR+, HER2+++
6x pre-surgery TCH chemo finished 9/15/7 Dramatic tumor shrinkage
1 year Herceptin till 6/08
MRM 10/11/07, SNB: 0/4 nodes + Path: tumors reduced to only a few "scattered cells"
now 50% ER+, PR- ???
Rads finished 1/16/08
Added Tamoxifen,
Finished Herceptin 05/08
NOW is the time to appreciate life to the fullest.
TSund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 12:59 PM   #4
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
I suppose you mean the OncoDx test--

the answer is no, it is not one of the factors that make up the recurrence score.

It can be tested for, hence the study--don't know of testing that is clinically available (ie, outside of research) or FDA approved (hence reimbursable)
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 10:57 PM   #5
Jean
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,154
Identifying this new Gene could open doors for treatment...this new finding further proves how much we need to discover the role of genes
in bc and recurrance - this could explain why some bc patients do well
without chemo depending on their genes. There is much to be understood
and learning how bc will respond to treatment - there are so many changes that take place in bc cells - let's hopet his new gene will help
hit the target....

Each day we get a little bit closer.....
Jean
__________________
Stage 1, Grade 1, 3/30/05
Lumpectomy 4/15/05 - 6MM IDC
Node Neg. (Sentinel node)
ER+ 90% / PR-, Her2+++ by FISH
Ki-67 40%
Arimidex 5/05
Radiation 32 trt, 5/30/05
Oncotype DX test 4/17/06, 31% high risk
TOPO 11 neg. 4/06
Stopped Arimidex 5/06
TCH 5/06, 6 treatments
Herceptin 5/06 - for 1 yr.
9/06 Completed chemo
Started Femara Sept. 2006
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2007, 06:43 AM   #6
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
In early summer I posted a gene they found which appeared

responsible for her2+ bc (it may not be the only one) and it was Xlinked so that only one copy was necessary to cause the disease. They same gene is necessary for T regulatory cells (the ones which help her2+ breast cancer hide from the immune system) Interestingly, this gene seemed especially linked to her2+ ER+ breast cancer, a group of breast cancers (probably several when it all comes down to it) for which they are having a hard time designating a molecular subtype of bc --as best I can ascertain ~30% of luminal Bs are her2+ ER+. The gene is called FOXP3 and its absence allows
amplification of her2. Use the search funciton and put in FOXP3 if you missed my earlier post.

Hope this helps...
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2007, 08:10 PM   #7
Jean
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,154
hmmm thanks Lani did miss that post will check it out!

Jean
__________________
Stage 1, Grade 1, 3/30/05
Lumpectomy 4/15/05 - 6MM IDC
Node Neg. (Sentinel node)
ER+ 90% / PR-, Her2+++ by FISH
Ki-67 40%
Arimidex 5/05
Radiation 32 trt, 5/30/05
Oncotype DX test 4/17/06, 31% high risk
TOPO 11 neg. 4/06
Stopped Arimidex 5/06
TCH 5/06, 6 treatments
Herceptin 5/06 - for 1 yr.
9/06 Completed chemo
Started Femara Sept. 2006
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter