HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2006, 10:56 AM   #1
Mary Jo
Senior Member
 
Mary Jo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sheboygan, WI
Posts: 2,582
Smile AC-T(adriamycin, cytoxin, taxol) vs. Carboplatin and taxotere

Hello everyone,

Just a question. Why do some receive AC-T treatment and others receive Carboplatin/Taxotere treatment? I have been hearing about the carboplatin lately and just wondered about it. I am a stage 2 - er/pr neg. her2 - positive - grade 3 tumor. First sentinal node had one microscopic cell in it - 2nd sentinal node was clean. I started treatment Nov. 30th 2005 - dose dense (bi-weekly) first 4 weeks received A/C - next 4 weeks received taxol and herceptin. Had bi-lateral mastectomy - cancer right breast - no cancer left breast.

Thanks for your answers.

marejo

God's Peace to all!
Mary Jo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 11:14 AM   #2
mindersue
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 30
My doctor recommended against combining adriamycin with Herceptin because both can adversely affect the heart. If I hadn't been on Herceptin, I would've done the AC-T.
mindersue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 12:27 PM   #3
CPA
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 93
The discussion revolves around different arms of the herceptin adjuvant trials. Early on, there were multiple studies using herceptin in conjunction with different adjuvant chemo regimens.

Eventually, the two studies were combined into one large study. Both the AC->TH and TCH arms showed significant improvement in survivability over the non-herceptin arms.

There are advantages/disadvantages to both AC->TH and TCH regimens.

AC->TH can, in some patients, harm cardiac muscle. If a patient has a previous cardiac history, then this regimen may be considered risky. However, the interim results of the study showed a slightly greater success rate with this treatment. It was not known if long term follow-up would show a statistically significant difference between this and TCH.

TCH has lower cardiac toxicity rates, but may be less effective against tumors that co-amplify TOPO2. There are no easy tests for the co-amplification. I think only one or two labs are available to do this test and most insurance will not cover.

Essentially, it is a trade-off with "most" oncologists preferring the AC->TH regimen unless there is a reason to go with the TCH regimen. Of course, this may change next week or next month as new information becomes available.

For a discussion of the combined study see the info on BCIRG 006 at the following website.

www.bcirg.org
CPA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 06:40 PM   #4
Becky
Senior Member
 
Becky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Stockton, NJ
Posts: 4,179
Without testing your tumor for the Top IIA marker, those that are Her2+ should receive an anthracyclin (ie: adriamycin, epirubicin) because about half the people who are Her2+ are also Top IIA+. Anthracyclins really wipe out Top IIA+ bc. This is probably the reason that in the trials the AC followed by TH has better results than the TCH (because some of the women randomized to this arm might have been Top IIA+ and would have benefited more by having adriamycin). In the future, I am sure this marker will be tested and appropriate treatment will be given based on the result. However, if you are already starting out with some cardiac issues, TCH is gentler on the heart than AC followed by TH.


Jean (a member of our group) did get her tumor tested and she was Top IIA negative and is taking TCH since adriamycin or epirubicin would not benefit her.

In the trials, the AC followed by TH had a recurrence rate reduction of 52% while the TCH arm had a reduction of 39% (but as I noted above, I believe the difference comes from lack of testing of the Top IIA marker).

Hope this helps

Kind regards

Becky
Becky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2006, 05:05 PM   #5
janet11
Senior Member
 
janet11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 138
I'm also Topo II negative

I just got my test results back this afternoon, and I'm also Topo II negative, so am starting 6 cycles of TCH on Tuesday.

Janet
__________________
Janet in Rowlett Texas

Dx July 2006 IDC 1.8cm, ER-/PR- HER2+ (FISH 7), KI67 High (60%) grade 3, TOPO II neg
Aug2006: lumpectomy, SNB (4 nodes neg), Stage 1
Jan 2007:
Finished 6 cycles of TCH (Taxotere, Carboplatin, Her ceptin). Then Herceptin every 3 weeks.
Feb 2007: Completed Radiation
May 2007: Stopped Herceptin due to low LVEF (49%)
July 2007: LVEF now 44% -- starting Coreg
May 2008: Heart NORMAL! Yippee.
janet11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2006, 07:55 AM   #6
Shell
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 301
Topo IIA

Becky or Janet-

This was an interesting thread, as we are looking at changing chemo regimes for me.

Is testing for the Topo IIA marker done reguarly - if so, what would I look for? If not, I suppose I can ask my onc to add it because i'm getting labs for the ca 27-29...

Thanks,
Shell
Shell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2006, 10:01 AM   #7
Becky
Senior Member
 
Becky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Stockton, NJ
Posts: 4,179
Shell


The Topo2A marker testing has to be done on a sample of your tumor (it is not a blood test).

Kind regards

Becky
Becky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2006, 03:47 PM   #8
janet11
Senior Member
 
janet11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 138
And it's definitely not a routine test. The tissue sample has to be sent out specifically for it.

Let us know what happens with you, OK?

Janet
janet11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2006, 05:01 AM   #9
Shell
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 301
Thanks Janet and Becky-


thanks for pointing out that it's the tumor that's tested, I went back and saw that you did say that clearly in your posts - this stuff is tough for us non-medical folks!

i'm going to look at my path reports to see if they tested for that...would they have done that as a matter of course in 2003 i wonder?

Thanks,
Shell
Shell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2006, 06:20 AM   #10
MJo
Senior Member
 
MJo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wilmington, Del.
Posts: 1,126
They don't routinely test for TOPO2 today, so I'm sure they didn't in 2003. I hadn't heard about the test in 2005 so I didn't push for it. Got the Oncotype SX test instead. I were entering treatment today, I'd push my onc for the Topo Test. I made it through three A/C treatments. Would have spared myself if I could have.
MJo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter