HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-30-2006, 07:34 PM   #1
sassy
Senior Member
 
sassy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Posts: 2,267
Images: 4
Her2+--grade--necrosis

In a response to Skibunny in another thread, Robin states:

"NOt all DCIS is her2+. High grade comedo necrosis DCIS is her2+ at about 70-80% of the time. Probably the lower grades are not as her2+. However, before taking Herceptin, a her2 FISH test would be indicated."
__________________

Is all HER2+ grade three, and also does all HER2+ DCIS have comedo necrosis?
________
AlletaLove live

Last edited by sassy; 08-22-2011 at 08:54 AM..
sassy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2006, 07:51 PM   #2
Becky
Senior Member
 
Becky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Stockton, NJ
Posts: 4,179
Sassy


I don't know about your invasive cancer but mine was grade 2 and had minimal necrosis noted so I don't think all Her2+ DCIS would be grade 3 with alot of necrosis.

Becky
Becky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2006, 09:06 PM   #3
Montana
Senior Member
 
Montana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 161
My DCIS was grade 3 with comedo necrosis. I think the invasive portion was grade 2 and 3.
__________________
Diag. Oct. 2004 age 54 left breast
Stage 1 grade 3; 6mm IDC; unknown amount of DCIS
with comedo necrosis; node neg.
Nottingham Grade 7/9
ER 91% PR 62%; Her2 3.6 by ICH; KI-67 35%

Nov 2004 Lumpectomy; SNB failed so had
full axillary clearance;
Dec 2004 2nd lumpy for clean DCIS margins.

Jan/Feb 2005 4 A/C dose dense;
33 rads finished 6/2005;
Began 5 years Arimidex in 6/2005
No Herceptin
9/2007 Quit Arimidex due to severe side effects.
NED
Montana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2006, 09:20 PM   #4
tousled1
Senior Member
 
tousled1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 2,104
Article of Interest regarding necrosis

When women with noninvasive breast cancer had radiation treatment after their tumors were removed, the chance that the cancer would come back dropped from 31 percent to 13 percent, according to an update of a national research trial.



The eight-year update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project Protocol B-17 included women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a noninvasive breast cancer. The participants were randomly chosen to receive either breast irradiation following lumpectomy or no further treatment after lumpectomy. The findings were reported in the journal Cancer (Vol. 86, No. 3).

DCIS is the earliest stage of breast cancer, said Debbie Saslow, PhD, director of breast and cervical cancer for the American Cancer Society (ACS). "The standard treatment is to remove it. Most women will be absolutely fine, but for some women, DCIS is a precursor to a worse cancer. For most women with DCIS, you do a lumpectomy and follow up with radiation."

In some women, DCIS occurs all over the breast, making it impossible to do a lumpectomy. Instead, these patients must have a mastectomy, but they don’t need the follow-up radiation because DCIS is noninvasive.

The research team that worked on the trial update, headed by Edwin R. Fisher, MD, of Allegheny University in Pittsburgh, found the presence of a type of DCIS called comedo carcinoma or comedo necrosis – which contains areas of dead or degenerating cells – can predict the chance of cancer recurrence.

"A moderate to marked degree of comedo necrosis is high risk for recurrence, and absent to slight comedo necrosis is low risk for recurrence," Dr. Fisher said.

The study also offers some information about whether women with this low-risk cancer need radiation, he said.

"The difference in recurrence between the irradiated group and the non-irradiated group was only seven to 10 percent. It is statistically significant yet some could argue this may be a group that does not need radiation. If it were 20 percent, there wouldn’t be any debate about it. At seven to 10 percent most clinicians would still give radiation. But, if a woman lives in a place where she can’t get treatment, or if she is an older woman, she might want to forgo the radiation," Dr. Fisher said.

However, Dr. Saslow said women should have the option of getting radiation. "My view is that a woman should be presented with the facts and assisted in making the decision that’s right for her. She should have the choice. Just because you have an older woman or somebody in a remote area doesn’t mean it’s not worth it to them to go to the trouble and the risks of radiation."

Women should be aware that radiation has the potential side effect of lymphedema, Dr. Saslow added. "It’s pretty serious for a younger person, and they’re at risk for the rest of their life. So that might be something additional to add to the equation," she said.



In an editorial accompanying Dr. Fisher's report, Monica Morrow, MD, of the department of surgery in the Lynn Sage Breast Center at Northwestern University Medical School in Chicago, stressed the importance of another point emphasized by the B-17 trial. "The risk of breast cancer death after a diagnosis of DCIS was only 1.6 percent at eight years. Having faced numerous terrified women over the years who were convinced that the ‘bad’ characteristics of their DCIS (high-grade comedo necrosis and large tumor size) doomed them to death from breast carcinoma, this point cannot be overemphasized," she wrote. Dr. Morrow concluded the study is an important first step toward understanding the progression of cancerous changes in the breast. "It is now time to move on, and reach a consensus regarding what future studies will allow us to define the appropriate intensity of therapy for the individual woman with DCIS," she wrote.
__________________
Kate
Stage IIIC Diagnosed Oct 25, 2005 (age 58)
ER/PR-, HER2+++, grade 3, Ploidy/DNA index: Aneuploid/1.61, S-phase: 24.2%
Neoadjunct chemo: 4 A/C; 4 Taxatore
Bilateral mastectomy June 8, 2006
14 of 26 nodes positive
Herceptin June 22, 2006 - April 20, 2007
Radiation (X35) July 24-September 11, 2006
BRCA1/BRCA2 negative
Stage IV lung mets July 13, 2007 - TCH
Single brain met - August 6, 2007 -CyberKnife
Oct 2007 - clear brain MRI and lung mets shrinking.
March 2008 lung met progression, brain still clear - begin Tykerb/Xeloda/Ixempra
tousled1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2006, 09:46 AM   #5
penelope
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 153
mine was grade 2 with necrosis
__________________

penelope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2006, 06:08 PM   #6
sassy
Senior Member
 
sassy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Posts: 2,267
Images: 4
Another thought on this, does the necrosis ever factor into reported size of tumor, or considered a "dead" part of an original tumor?
________
Kid Depakote

Last edited by sassy; 08-22-2011 at 08:54 AM..
sassy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2006, 07:27 PM   #7
Bev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 1,055
Interesting question Sassy. Wildly guessing I would think it would be included in the size. My question is does the biopsy cause necrosis and inflammation which is also included in the size? I don't know if it really matters though. BB
Bev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 05:45 AM   #8
Becky
Senior Member
 
Becky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Stockton, NJ
Posts: 4,179
Necrosis is factored in as it is part of tumor size. Necrosis is a bad prognostic factor because, theoretically, it means that the tumor is growing faster than it can make new blood vessels to sustain itself.


Becky
Becky is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter