HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-01-2007, 04:10 PM   #1
weezie1053
Senior Member
 
weezie1053's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bedford, Virginia
Posts: 134
Differences/Benefits of MRI, Pet Scan, Cat Scan, etc.??

You senior members are a wonderful resource of information. I just started following these threads a few months ago, and I am realizing how much I don't know.

Can someone explain to me why some members have MRI's, others Pet Scans and other Cat Scans? What the differences and the benefits of each one. What is the most beneificial for screening?

I am scheduled for my second ever MRI, and I was just wondering.

Thanks.

Louise
__________________
  • Diagnosis 06/06 - Stage II-A BC; BC was 2.5 cm, grade 2; ER/PR negative & HER-2/neu positive;
  • Mastectomy w/ reconstruction (implant) in 09/06;lymph nodes - negative;
  • AC/Cytoxin combo - 4 treatments (dose dense);
  • Taxol/Herceptin combo- 12 weekly treatments;
  • Completed chemo - 2/07; completed restruction 02/07; reduction of left breast.
  • BRCA 1 and 2 negative - 6/15/07;DX high risk for distant recurrence
  • MRI, 08/02/07 - NED
  • 1 year Anniversary - 09/07; completed Herceptin 11/07.
  • Mammo 02/14/08 - NED; MRI - 08/2008 - NED
  • 2 year Anniversary - 09/08
  • Mammo 02/09 - NED; MRI - 08/09 - NED
  • 3rd year Anniversary - 09/09
  • 5th Annivery - 09/2011 - NED
weezie1053 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2007, 11:53 AM   #2
fauxgypsy
Senior Member
 
fauxgypsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 600
I am hoping someone will answer this as well. If no one answers it soon I will try but there are others on this board with much more experience than I have. I do think that some of the difference is the doctor's preference. With one Dr. I had CT scans, MRIs, and PET scans. With the other I had CT scans and bone scans. I know each one may be better at detecting a certain type of metastasis. But some of it is preference. Some people have MUGA scans while they are on the herceptin, some have echocardiograms.

Leslie
fauxgypsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2007, 12:28 PM   #3
Becky
Senior Member
 
Becky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Stockton, NJ
Posts: 4,179
CT scans are xrays taken in small "slices" so there are many of the pictures and together they represent the organ or area being viewed.

A Pet/CT is the same thing but you are given an injection of radioactive glucose (a sugar). Theory is that cancer, since it is growing faster than normal cells, takes up this glucose and the special xrays picks up a glow if cancer is there (false positives include injury or infection since your body is rapidly "growing" in those situations - ie: healing). A CT could show a tumor but a PET/CT would tell you if that tumor is alive or dead. Therefore, a PET might be better to track a tumor you know you have but you don't know if the chemo has worked its magic.

An MRI uses no radiation as PET or CT does. It uses magnetic waves. The waves pass through your body (or organ) and make a picture. Some tissues, like the brain, don't xray well. Also, if you have a brain tumor and your doctor is tracking its regression or progression, an MRI is better as you are not radiating the brain over and over again - especially since it is radiation that is the cure for the tumor. MRI is a good method to track some tumors. They work well to diagnose both breast cancer and DCIS but MRI does not work as well as mammograms to uncover calcifications - especially calcifications that might be hiding a small DCIS (therefore, both used together could be best).

PET/CT is probably best for the body (as you will be able to tell if the mass detected is cancer) and MRI for the brain.
I hope this helps
__________________
Kind regards

Becky

Found lump via BSE
Diagnosed 8/04 at age 45
1.9cm tumor, ER+PR-, Her2 3+(rt side)
2 micromets to sentinel node
Stage 2A
left 3mm DCIS - low grade ER+PR+Her2 neg
lumpectomies 9/7/04
4DD AC followed by 4 DD taxol
Used Leukine instead of Neulasta
35 rads on right side only
4/05 started Tamoxifen
Started Herceptin 4 months after last Taxol due to
trial results and 2005 ASCO meeting & recommendations
Oophorectomy 8/05
Started Arimidex 9/05
Finished Herceptin (16 months) 9/06
Arimidex Only
Prolia every 6 months for osteopenia

NED 18 years!

Said Christopher Robin to Pooh: "You must remember this: You're braver than you believe and stronger than you seem and smarter than you think"
Becky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2007, 02:14 PM   #4
Brenda_D
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 368
Very well put, Becky.

I was wondering what my next scan should be. It seems a Pet may be the best for to see if the chemo and rads killed the ca in my IM node.

Thanks!
__________________
12/12/06- IDC Stage III, 4x A/C, 35 rads, Herceptin 1 year
Brenda_D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2007, 06:52 PM   #5
weezie1053
Senior Member
 
weezie1053's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bedford, Virginia
Posts: 134
Thanks, Becky. Since my BC was confined to the right breast and had not spread to the lymph nodes, the MRI would make sense. I plan on having the mammo each spring, and continue to have the MRI ilate summer/fall. Had a MRI today, and it will probably be several days before I have the results since my Onc is on vacation.

Thanks again.

Louise
__________________
  • Diagnosis 06/06 - Stage II-A BC; BC was 2.5 cm, grade 2; ER/PR negative & HER-2/neu positive;
  • Mastectomy w/ reconstruction (implant) in 09/06;lymph nodes - negative;
  • AC/Cytoxin combo - 4 treatments (dose dense);
  • Taxol/Herceptin combo- 12 weekly treatments;
  • Completed chemo - 2/07; completed restruction 02/07; reduction of left breast.
  • BRCA 1 and 2 negative - 6/15/07;DX high risk for distant recurrence
  • MRI, 08/02/07 - NED
  • 1 year Anniversary - 09/07; completed Herceptin 11/07.
  • Mammo 02/14/08 - NED; MRI - 08/2008 - NED
  • 2 year Anniversary - 09/08
  • Mammo 02/09 - NED; MRI - 08/09 - NED
  • 3rd year Anniversary - 09/09
  • 5th Annivery - 09/2011 - NED
weezie1053 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2007, 09:22 PM   #6
hutchibk
Senior Member
 
hutchibk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,519
According to my onc, each scan shows different things more effectively: (let's see if I can remember this and not make a fool of myself...)

CT - good for looking at organs and bones. One of the best tools for studying the chest and abdomen and skeletal structures because it provides detailed, cross-sectional views of all types of tissue. Often the preferred method for diagnosing many different cancers, including lung, liver and pancreatic cancer, since the image allows a physician to confirm the presence of a tumor and measure its size, precise location and the extent of the tumor's involvement with other nearby tissue.

MRI - Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Not radiation, uses magnetic field and radio waves. It is good for looking at soft tissue and brain. Detailed MR images allow physicians to better evaluate parts of the body and certain diseases that may not be assessed adequately with other imaging methods such as x-ray, ultrasound or CT Scan. Because protons are most abundant in water molecules, MR images show differences in water content between various body tissues. As a result, MRI is especially suited to detecting disorders that increase fluid in diseased areas of the body, for example, areas affected by tumors, infection and inflammation. Overall, the differentiation of abnormal (diseased) tissue from normal tissues is significantly easier with MRI than with other imaging modalities such as x-ray, CT and ultrasound.

PET - good for deeper reference when you can't determine what you are seeing on a CT or MRI, or when tumor markers indicate activity but CT and MRI don't show anything. PET can often see the smallest spots that the others don't as it shows anotomic as well as metabolic information. PET scans are used most often to detect cancer and to examine the effects of cancer therapy by characterizing biochemical changes in the cancer. These scans can be performed on the whole body. PET scans of the brain are used to evaluate patients who have memory disorders of an undetermined cause, suspected or proven brain tumors or seizure disorders that are not responsive to medical therapy and are therefore candidates for surgery.


(OK, I cheated a little and googled for more factual info)
__________________
Brenda

NOV 2012 - 9 yr anniversary
JULY 2012 - 7 yr anniversary stage IV (of 50...)

Nov'03~ dX stage 2B
Dec'03~
Rt side mastectomy, Her2+, ER/PR+, 10 nodes out, one node positive
Jan'04~
Taxotere/Adria/Cytoxan x 6, NED, no Rads, Tamox. 1 year, Arimadex 3 mo., NED 14 mo.
Sept'05~
micro mets lungs/chest nodes/underarm node, Switched to Aromasin, T/C/H x 7, NED 6 months - Herceptin only
Aug'06~
micro mets chest nodes, & bone spot @ C3 neck, Added Taxol to Herceptin
Feb'07~ Genetic testing, BRCA 1&2 neg

Apr'07~
MRI - two 9mm brain mets & 5 punctates, new left chest met, & small increase of bone spot C3 neck, Stopped Aromasin
May'07~
Started Tykerb/Xeloda, no WBR for now
June'07~
MRI - stable brain mets, no new mets, 9mm spots less enhanced, CA15.3 down 45.5 to 9.3 in 10 wks, Ty/Xel working magic!
Aug'07~
MRI - brain mets shrunk half, NO NEW BRAIN METS!!, TMs stable @ 9.2
Oct'07~
PET/CT & MRI show NED
Apr'08~
scans still show NED in the head, small bone spot on right iliac crest (rear pelvic bone)
Sept'08~
MRI shows activity in brain mets, completed 5 fractions/5 consecutive days of IMRT to zap the pesky buggers
Oct'08~
dropped Xeloda, switched to tri-weekly Herceptin in combo with Tykerb, extend to tri-monthly Zometa infusion
Dec'08~
Brain MRI- 4 spots reduced to punctate size, large spot shrunk by 3mm, CT of torso clear/pelvis spot stable
June'09~
new 3-4mm left cerrebellar spot zapped with IMRT targeted rads
Sept'09~
new 6mm & 1 cm spots in pituitary/optic chiasm area. Rx= 25 days of 3D conformal fractionated targeted IMRT to the tumors.
Oct'09~
25 days of low dose 3D conformal fractionated targeted IMRT to the bone mets spot on rt. iliac crest that have been watching for 2 years. Added daily Aromasin back into treatment regimen.
Apr'10~ Brain MRI clear! But, see new small spot on adrenal gland. Change from Aromasin back to Tamoxifen.
June'10~ Tumor markers (CA15.3) dropped from 37 to 23 after one month on Tamoxifen. Continue to monitor adrenal gland spot. Remain on Tykerb/Herceptin/Tamoxifen.
Nov'10~ Radiate positive mediastinal node that was pressing on recurrent laryngeal nerve, causing paralyzed larynx and a funny voice.
Jan'11~ MRI shows possible activity or perhaps just scar tissue/necrotic increase on 3 previously treated brain spots and a pituitary spot. 5 days of IMRT on 4 spots.
Feb'11~ Enrolled in T-DM1 EAP in Denver, first treatment March 25, 2011.
Mar'11~ Finally started T-DM1 EAP in Denver at Rocky Mountain Cancer Center/Rose on Mar. 25... hallelujah.

"I would rather be anecdotally alive than statistically dead."
hutchibk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 01:32 AM   #7
Lala
Senior Member
 
Lala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 131
Now to add my 2 cents. Here's how the scans are used in a stage 4 case.
Every 2 to 3 months I have various scans to see the response to treatment. The Catscan of the Abdomen and Chest are used to monitor my Liver mets. I have the Bone Scan for a full skeletal picture to monitor my bone mets. In addition, I have a MRI of the Thoracic and Lumbar region of the Spine, this offers a far better view than the bone scan. I have a Brain MRI every 6 months as per the request of my oncologist whom thinks all Stage 4 Her2+ need to do this schedule. I have recently changed that schedule. I now have a Brain MRI every few months to make sure I am NED in the Brain.
I have a Pet Scan after every treatment course is completed in order to see the total response of the treatment, this is usually every 6 months or even yearly.

Every person is different, I believe every newly diagnosed cancer patient needs baseline scans to insure proper staging.
__________________
Lala
DX Fall05 Stage 4 er+ pr+ her2+ liver and bone mets
DX Fall06 Brain mets, Brain mets gone Spring 2007
Lala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 09:29 AM   #8
anotherone
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13
It is not inocuous - to have those scans ( apart from MRI I guess). I was told not to hold a baby on my lap for a couple of days after either bone scan or CT scan - I don't remember. And when I compare radiation received from a intraoral dental radiogram to CT scan - CT scans produce hundreeds thousands times more radiation.
Oncologist told me initial staging CT and bone scans find methastasis in only 5% of women with stage 3, and as far as I remember about 30% of us will develop them in either 5 year time or 10 year time. It does meen the disease is still undetected in majority of cases. I don't know, probably PET is more sensitive and statistics for it are different.
anotherone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 10:29 AM   #9
Lala
Senior Member
 
Lala's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 131
I have to add I am a strong advocate that all Her2+ upon diagnosis get a base line PET Scan. In my opinion, I think it is needed to help with the staging process.

When I was diagnosed I was thought to be only Stage 1 based upon my Tumor size being under 2 cm. Although I had no symptoms of pain I felt I needed to be tested head to toe before I had a lumpectomy. I requested and fought for a PET Scan.

The PET Scan revealed that I had Bone mets. Later tests showed Liver mets. I learned that Her2 is aggressive and being properly diagnosed is the key to proper treatment. Thankfully that PET Scan was the key to a proper diagnosis for me. I was then able to get the proper treatment quickly.

It is extremely important that if you are scheduled for a PET Scan, Please ask your imaging center for the Special PET Scan Diet.
This Diet needs to be done prior to your scan appointment. This is a diet that removes all glucose the from your body, enabling the PET Scan to properly work. The night before and day of your test you have a list of foods you must avoid. It is so crucial to do this diet as it enables the proper results. Sadly some people do not know this and the PET scan results can be affected by your diet. My cancer center sends out instructions on how to prepare for all diagnostic tests.
__________________
Lala
DX Fall05 Stage 4 er+ pr+ her2+ liver and bone mets
DX Fall06 Brain mets, Brain mets gone Spring 2007
Lala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2007, 09:51 PM   #10
weezie1053
Senior Member
 
weezie1053's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bedford, Virginia
Posts: 134
Smile

Good news. After waiting 3 agonizing days, my Oncologist's office called, and my MRI was clean. No sign of invasive cancer on either breast. It was worth the wait. Thank you for your prayers and support.

Every day is a gift.

Louise
__________________
  • Diagnosis 06/06 - Stage II-A BC; BC was 2.5 cm, grade 2; ER/PR negative & HER-2/neu positive;
  • Mastectomy w/ reconstruction (implant) in 09/06;lymph nodes - negative;
  • AC/Cytoxin combo - 4 treatments (dose dense);
  • Taxol/Herceptin combo- 12 weekly treatments;
  • Completed chemo - 2/07; completed restruction 02/07; reduction of left breast.
  • BRCA 1 and 2 negative - 6/15/07;DX high risk for distant recurrence
  • MRI, 08/02/07 - NED
  • 1 year Anniversary - 09/07; completed Herceptin 11/07.
  • Mammo 02/14/08 - NED; MRI - 08/2008 - NED
  • 2 year Anniversary - 09/08
  • Mammo 02/09 - NED; MRI - 08/09 - NED
  • 3rd year Anniversary - 09/09
  • 5th Annivery - 09/2011 - NED
weezie1053 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2007, 11:44 PM   #11
Chelee
Senior Member
 
Chelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern, CA
Posts: 2,511
Louise, That is just fantastic news. You can't ask for better then that. Its always so nice to get the all clear. Yeah...go out and celebrate a bit....you deserve it after stressing for a few days. Its so nice to come here and find GOOD news.

Chelee
__________________
DX: 12-20-05 - Stage IIIA, Her2/Neu, 3+++,Er & Pr weakly positive, 5 of 16 pos nodes.
Rt. MRM on 1-3-06 -- No Rads due to compromised lungs.
Chemo started 2-7-06 -- TCH - - Finished 6-12-06
Finished yr of wkly herceptin 3-19-07
3-15-07 Lt side prophylactic simple mastectomy. -- Ooph 4-05-07
9-21-09 PET/CT "Recurrence" to Rt. axllia, Rt. femur, ilium. Possible Sacrum & liver? Now stage IV.
9-28-09 Loading dose of Herceptin & started Zometa
9-29-09 Power Port Placement
10-24-09 Mass 6.4 x 4.7 cm on Rt. femur head.
11-19-09 RT. Femur surgery - Rod placed
12-7-09 Navelbine added to Herceptin/Zometa.
3-23-10 Ten days of rads to RT femur. Completed.
4-05-10 Quit Navelbine--Herceptin/Zometa alone.
5-4-10 Appt. with Dr. Slamon to see what is next? Waiting on FISH results from femur biopsy.
Results to FISH was unsuccessful--this happens less then 2% of the time.
7-7-10 Recurrence to RT axilla again. Back to UCLA for options.
Chelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2007, 01:57 AM   #12
Esther
Senior Member
 
Esther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 484
Does anyone know how small a mass the pet scan can detect? Just wondering if there is a lower limit. The MRI machine that Cedars-Sinai uses can detect brain lesions as small as 1 mm.

Are different pet scan machines more sensitive than others, or do they all have the same limitations?
Esther is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter