HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > Articles of Interest
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-25-2007, 06:13 AM   #1
RobinP
Senior Member
 
RobinP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 943
Breastfeeding increased risk her2+ bc...

Breastfeeding was associated with a 4-fold increased risk only for breast cancer that overexpressed HER-2/neu in this particular article:

http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/full/9/1/65

Also, prolactin protects bc cells against apoptosis or cell death:
http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v91/n2/abs/6601947a.htm

Also, oxytocin has a antiproliferative effect on bc cells through the PKA pathway, which inhibits Ras and proliferation:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/en...&dopt=Abstract

PS I breastfeed about a year before I got bc. Interesting.
__________________
Robin
2002- dx her2 positive DCIS/bc TX Mast, herceptin chemo
RobinP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 08:22 AM   #2
RhondaH
Senior Member
 
RhondaH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 1,516
I weaned Tony 1/02...

and was dx (weakly HER2+) on 2/05. Interesting.

Rhonda
__________________
Rhonda

Dx 2/1/05, Stage 1, 0 nodes, Grade 3, ER/PR-, HER2+ (3.16 Fish)
2/7/05, Partial Mastectomy
5/18/05 Finished 6 rounds of dose dense TEC (Taxotere, Epirubicin and Cytoxan)
8/1/05 Finished 33 rads
8/18/05 Started Herceptin, every 3 weeks for a year (last one 8/10/06)

2/1/13...8 year Cancerversary and I am "perfect" (at least where cancer is concerned;)


" And in the end, it's not the years in your life that count. It's the life in your years."- Abraham Lincoln
RhondaH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 01:11 PM   #3
Christine MH-UK
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 414
But that's not what it says

"Breastfeeding for at least 1 year was inversely associated with HER-2/neu+ breast cancer [OR, 0.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1–0.7] more so than HER-2/neu- breast cancer (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5–1.2)."

In plain English:
'Inversely associated' means breastfeeding decreased the incidence of Her2/neu+. The .3 means that women who breastfed for at least a year got only 30% as much her2 positive breast cancer as those who didn't (although this is an estimate and the actually amount is likely to be between 10% to 70% as much). In contrast, breast feeding women had 80% as much her2 neu negative breast cancer (a reduction, but not as big a reduction as for her2 positive women) and although it is possible that breast feeding may halve breast cancer in this group, it is also possible that it doesn't make a difference.

So, why do women who have breast fed sometimes get her2+ positive cancer? Well, even if breast feeding women had only a third the incidence of breast cancer, there will still be alot of women in that one third. Also the mutation that caused the breast cancer may have occurred before breast feeding.
Christine MH-UK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter