HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > Inflammatory Breast Cancer
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-29-2007, 08:55 AM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
complicated new article on the origins/pathways gone awry in Inflammatory BC

ABSTRACT: NF-?B activation in inflammatory breast cancer is associated with oestrogen receptor downregulation, secondary to EGFR and/or ErbB2 overexpression and MAPK hyperactivation [British Journal of Cancer]
Activation of NF-?B in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is associated with loss of estrogen receptor (ER) expression, indicating a potential crosstalk between NF-?B and ER. In this study, we examined the activation of NF-?B in IBC and non-IBC with respect to ER and EGFR and/or ErbB2 expression and MAPK hyperactivation. A qRT-PCR based ER signature was evaluated in tumours with and without transcriptionally active NF-?B, as well as correlated with the expression of eight NF-?B target genes. Using a combined ER/NF-?B signature, hierarchical clustering was executed. Hyperactivation of MAPK was investigated using a recently described MAPK signature (Creighton et al, 2006), and was linked to tumour phenotype, ER and EGFR and/or ErbB2 overexpression. The expression of most ER-modulated genes was significantly elevated in breast tumours without transcriptionally active NF-?B. In addition, the expression of most ER-modulated genes was significantly anticorrelated with the expression of most NF-?B target genes, indicating an inverse correlation between ER and NF-?B activation. Clustering using the combined ER and NF-?B signature revealed one cluster mainly characterised by low NF-?B target gene expression and a second one with elevated NF-?B target gene expression. The first cluster was mainly characterised by non-IBC specimens and IHC ER+ breast tumours (13 out of 18 and 15 out of 18 respectively), whereas the second cluster was mainly characterised by IBC specimens and IHC ER- breast tumours (12 out of 19 and 15 out of 19 respectively) (Pearson ?2, P<0.0001 and P<0.0001 respectively). Hyperactivation of MAPK was associated with both ER status and tumour phenotype by unsupervised hierarchical clustering using the MAPK signature and was significantly reflected by overexpression of EGFR and/or ErbB2. NF-?B activation is linked to loss of ER expression and activation in IBC and in breast cancer in general. The inverse correlation between NF-?B activation and ER activation is due to EGFR and/or ErbB2 overexpression, resulting in NF-?B activation and ER downregulation.
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2007, 08:55 AM   #2
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
the ?s should be K for Kappa--don 't know why that happens!

hope this helps
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2007, 11:54 PM   #3
Roz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 105
Talking

I found this quite hard to follow Lani, but thank you for posting it. I am ER+ and IBC. I was 56 when diagnosed, 5 years past menopause. I am wondering whether or not I should have my ER tested again, as I have a sneaking suspicion that I might have only a little bit of +. If I read this article correctly, ER downregulation should mean ER-??
__________________
diagnosed June 03. Rt sided Inflammatory BC in rt lower quadrant. 7cm tumour. Also 3 DCIS. 3 rounds of EC, mastectomy with axillary clearance (12 nodes+ of 19). 1 more EC. 5 weeks of rads, with weekly booster to attack skin lymph involvement. 4 cycles of Taxol. Tamoxifen.Recurrence December 04, Herceptin started early Jan05,+ Arimidex.
NED 26 mths. Recurrence early Mar07. Taxol added to Herceptin. NED. Will have total of 6 cycles, then Aromisan and Herceptin. Early Oct 07, recurrence to the pesky right upper lobe, with some pleural thickening upper rt hemithorax. T/X now the treatment. May 2008, Taxatere and Herceptin for lung recurrence
Roz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2007, 03:11 AM   #4
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
downregulation only means it is decreased, not necessarily absent

(although it can be)

In general according to Dr.Mark Pegram, one of the authors of the original article, all her2+ breast cancers have less ER than their measured ER
% would seem to indicate. This seems to be either because the way we measure ER is not the most accurate (I have posted on this before) or because ER percentage is correct but the hormonal sensitivity (the reason ER is tested) of those tumors that are her2 positive is decreased. A recent article I read said this may be because of AKT activation because of her2 or other downstream signalling systems, and in fact this seems to be a major way that other ER+ tumors escape the effects not only of tamoxifen , but even faslodex.

Here there seems to be a similar effect involving EGFR, her2, MAPK, NFKbeta and ER expression (inverse relationship) but the question seems to be what is the chicken and what is the egg and is there a feedback loop?
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter