HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-29-2013, 03:50 PM   #1
bmorr7
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 24
Re: TDM-1 results reported @ ASCO annual mtg 2012 now in New England Journal of Medic

Does this trial mean that Kadcyla is better than Herceptin? Or should stage 1 Her-2 positive patients still start with Herceptin?
bmorr7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2013, 02:48 AM   #2
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
Re: TDM-1 results reported @ ASCO annual mtg 2012 now in New England Journal of Medic

welcome--you are new to reading the literature on treatments for her2+ breast cancer. Let me help explain why we can't answer your question.

It (whether herceptin alone is enough, whether TDM1 is better than herceptin as an adjuvant treatment) has not been looked into yet. TDM1 trials may be beginning, but noone yet know that they will or will not be better, how long to treat etc. I believe there may be neoadjuvant trials looking into dual targetted treatment, but since your wife's breast were already removed, she cannot be a candidate.

In breast cancer all clinical trials must test a new agent ADDED to the standard of care (or one of several effective much used treatments) in order that they not claim the participant was cheated from having their best chance at a best response.

In addition, clinical trials are usually started on Stage IVs, where they have the least to lose ( the chance it will be proven to be unnecessarily toxic treatments which might not be effective is not considered so terrible if the person was expected to die anyway than if the person will in all likelihood survive). Later, once they have been proven to be safe (relatively) and more effective, they are introduced into trials of nonmetastatic patients.

Each of these phases has taken around a decade in the past.

From METASTATIC patients we know that adding chemo to herceptin is more effective than herceptin alone. From METASTATIC patients we know that adding lapatinib to herceptin is more effective than herceptin alone. But it will probably be a LONG LONG time before we know who, if anyone, can be effectively treated with herceptin alone, or herceptin+antihormonals alone, or herceptin+lapatinib along, or herceptin+pertuzumab alone, or a triple blockade regimen and how long that regimen will need to be utilized.

When there are no data to support a treatment you will be hard-pressed to find a doctor willing to offer it (they could be found negligent for not treating her with the standard of care) let alone an insurance company willing to pay for it (even if it would be cheaper)

Feel free to lookup clinical trials (NCI website) to see if anything offered fits your wife's case. Obviously since neoadjuvant trials are out, so you won't know if the treatment worked until years later (by whether or not she has an recurrence
rather than within weeks)

Best of luck!
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter