HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > Clinical Trials
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-12-2008, 11:03 AM   #1
runtolive
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 210
new gtrastuzumab-dm1 data from sabc

On December 12, 2008, interim clinical data from a trastuzumab-DM1 (T-DM1) Phase II trial were presented by study investigators at the San Antonio Breast Cancer (SABC) Symposium being held in San Antonio, TX. T-DM1 comprises ImmunoGen's DM1 cell-killing agent linked to Genentech's HER2-targeting antibody, trastuzumab, and is being developed by Genentech under a collaboration agreement with ImmunoGen.

The interim data reported were from the T-DM1 Phase II trial that began in July 2007. The trial is designed to evaluate T-DM1, administered at 3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks, in approximately 100 efficacy-evaluable patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer that progressed on treatment with HER2-directed therapy plus chemotherapy.

It was reported today that 112 patients were enrolled in this study, and that 107 of these patients were efficacy evaluable.

At the time of data cut-off for presentation (8/29/08), the patients had a median follow up of 4.4 months (19 weeks). Final results are expected to be available in 2009 when all patients have at least 6 months of follow-up.
Baseline demographic, disease characteristics and prior therapy information were reported for the 112 patients enrolled. All of these patients had metastatic disease, with 68.7% having at least 3 distinct metastatic sites.

They all had previously been treated with trastuzumab (Herceptin) plus chemotherapy, with a median time on trastuzumab of 76.6 weeks.

Additionally, 55.4% of these patients also had received lapatinib (Tykerb) plus chemotherapy. The median duration of treatment with lapatinib among the patients who had received it was 26.3 weeks. Approximately two-thirds (67.9%) of the patients had received prior anthracycline therapy.

At the time of data cut-off for presentation, the 112 patients had received a median of 5.0 cycles of T-DM1. Two patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events considered to be possibly related to the study drug. Three of the 112 patients were dose-reduced from 3.6 mg/kg to 3.0 mg/kg for tolerability reasons, and these three patients were still receiving T-DM1 at the time of data cut-off.

The efficacy section of the presentation reported two types of findings: the overall objective response rate (Overall ORR) and the confirmed objective response rate (Confirmed ORR). The Overall ORR includes all complete responses (CRs) and partial responses (PRs) reported, whereas the Confirmed ORR includes only those CRs and PRs that were able to be confirmed with two consecutive scans taken at least 4 weeks apart. (Reasons a response would not be confirmed include that the data cut-off occurred before it could be confirmed, that the patient withdrew from the study before it could be confirmed, and that it was not sustained long enough to be confirmed.)

Among the entire 107 efficacy evaluable patients, the Overall ORR was 39.3% and the Confirmed ORR was 27.1%, with an explanatory note included that these findings include 19 patients who only had one post-baseline tumor assessment (i.e., they had not had the absolute minimum number of assessments needed to confirm a response). Thus, results were also reported for just those patients who had either had at least 6 months of follow-up or had discontinued treatment prior to the data cut-off date. Among these 76 patients, the

Overall ORR was 43.4% and the Confirmed ORR was 38.2%. Other activity information presented was:

Sixty of the efficacy evaluable patients previously were treated with lapatinib. The activity of T-DM1 in these patients was found to be consistent with that in the entire study population (Overall ORR of 38.3%; Confirmed ORR of 21.7%).
? One of the inclusion criteria for the study is that patients have metastatic breast cancer that is HER2-positive (FISH+ and/or IHC3+). However, among the 86 efficacy evaluable patients where HER2 expression could be confirmed centrally, it was found that only 74.4% were HER2-positive by these criteria. Among the 64 patients confirmed to be HER2-positive, the Overall ORR was 50.0% and the Confirmed ORR was 34.4%.

The presentation conclusions include that T-DM1 shows single agent activity in patients with previously treated HER2-positive breast cancer, including patients previously treated with trastuzumab and with lapatinib, and appears to be well tolerated at the dose and schedule used.

Last edited by runtolive; 12-12-2008 at 11:10 AM..
runtolive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2008, 07:22 AM   #2
robind
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Central,New Jersey
Posts: 48
Wink

Question regarding Herceptin. I've just started Herceptin (every 3 weeks) for a year. I've read that there is a study currently being done to determine if continuing for a 2nd year is beneficial. Asked my onco. and she said that she should know better by the time I am almost at the end of my year, next November. I do not have metatastic cancer so my question is, does it mean if your cancer has not spread that this study or continuing for a 2nd year would not apply? Or, is there a separate study?
Hope someone has an answer to this question.
Happy Holidays to All,
robind
robind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2008, 05:56 AM   #3
robind
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Central,New Jersey
Posts: 48
Hi runtolive;
With regard to the trials of Herceptin, it appears that this from what you say only applies to Her2+ with metastatic cancer.
Is this correct as far as you know? I ask because I do not have metastatic cancer, had 1 positive lymph node. When I asked my oncologist, her response was that the study that is being done - the result/data should be in just as I will be completing Herceptin next Nov. I sort of got the impression that there is a possibility that I will continue on Herceptin for an additional year should the data prove that it is beneficial. There was no discussion with regard to my not having metastatic cancer. So, now I am quite confused. I will not see my oncologist till the end of January so cannot ask for more clarification.
And, good for you that you know as much as you do, where do you find all of this important information? Or, better question, how???
Thanks for clarifying...
Happy Holidays to you filled with good health for the New Year.
robind
robind is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter