HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-29-2007, 11:53 AM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
another paper on recurrence patterns--this one looks at ER status, tamoxifen use--not

her2 status

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Jan;107(1):71-8. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
Long-term pattern of disease recurrence among patients with early-stage breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status and use of adjuvant tamoxifen.

Khoshnoud MR, Fornander T, Johansson H, Rutqvist LE.
Department of oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Söder Hospital, 11883, Stockholm, Sweden, mahmoud.khoshnoud@Karolinska.se.
PURPOSE: Recent studies on the pattern of gene expression in estrogen receptor positive and negative tumours have revealed profound differences according to receptor status. However, it remains unclear if these differences reflect phenotypic traits in addition to sensitivity to endocrine therapy. This paper describes the long-term pattern of disease recurrence among ca. 2,600 pre- and post-menopausal patients with primary breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was based on patients with an operable, invasive breast cancer entered in one of three controlled clinical trials conducted by the Stockholm Breast Cancer Group. We selected those 2,562 patients who had been randomly allocated between adjuvant tamoxifen and no adjuvant systemic therapy. These patients had a known estrogen receptor status. RESULT: Tamoxifen reduced locoregional (8.8% vs. 12.4%, hazard ratio (HR), 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.83; P = 0.001, distant recurrences (17.2% vs. 20.2%, HR, 0.81; CI, 0.68-0.97; P = 0.018, as well as breast cancer death (18.7% vs. 23.7%, HR, 0.78; CI, 0.67-0.92; P = 0.002). Among patients not allocated to tamoxifen there was no significant differences in term of neither locoregional (12.4% vs. 12.4%, HR, 1; CI, 0.72-1.41; P = 0.98), nor distant metastases (18.5% vs. 20.7%, HR, 1.11;CI, 0.85-1.45; P = 0.46) according to ER status. The pattern of metastases was not different in ER positive comparison with ER negative. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the mentioned substantial differences in terms of gene expression appeared mainly to be related to endocrine sensitivity and not to metastatic potential. However, a slight advantage during the first five years for the ER positive versus ER negative patients in terms of cumulative incidence of events, suggested that ER negativity in some cases is correlated with an increased tumour growth rate.
PMID: 18043896 [PubMed - in process]

Still looking for the elusive article taking her2 status into account. Not much data published, which is probably why not included in Adjuvant Online
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter