|
11-04-2007, 12:24 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 869
|
Mastectomy and Stage 4...preventative?
Hello, I am wondering if anyone has chosen to have a preventative mastectomy (unaffected breast) after they became stage 4? Is there a benefit to doing so if you are in this advanced stage and NED? Just trying to analyze my options. Thanks Ceesun
|
|
|
11-05-2007, 06:29 AM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,193
|
mastectomy
Hi Ceese
Women definitely have an "unaffected" breast removed as a precaution, but
I am not sure about your question regarding Stage 4. Hopefully one of the
"wise ones" will see your question and have an answer. Good luck on Thurs.
__________________
PinkGirl
Dx Aug/05 at age 51
2cm. Stage 2A, Grade 3
ER+/PR-
Her2 +++
Sept 7/05 Mastectomy
4 FAC, 4 Taxol, no radiation
1 year of Herceptin
Tamoxifen for approx. 4 months,
Arimidex for 5 years
Prophylactic mastectomy June 22/09
" I yam what I yam." - Popeye
My Photo Album
|
|
|
11-05-2007, 07:07 AM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,154
|
seek link posted 10/23....
just recently posted an article on this subject...which you may be interested in reading...I do not believe that it has a focus on stage 4, but rather primarialy on decisions women are making as a preventative measure. Hope this helps.
Kind Regards,
Jean
__________________
Stage 1, Grade 1, 3/30/05
Lumpectomy 4/15/05 - 6MM IDC
Node Neg. (Sentinel node)
ER+ 90% / PR-, Her2+++ by FISH
Ki-67 40%
Arimidex 5/05
Radiation 32 trt, 5/30/05
Oncotype DX test 4/17/06, 31% high risk
TOPO 11 neg. 4/06
Stopped Arimidex 5/06
TCH 5/06, 6 treatments
Herceptin 5/06 - for 1 yr.
9/06 Completed chemo
Started Femara Sept. 2006
|
|
|
11-05-2007, 08:04 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 43
|
When first diag. I was going to have mastectomy on both sides ( I just didn't want to deal with b/c in the other breast if it recurred there), my surgeon recommed I didn't and I'm very glad I didn't. Being stage IV, which I am, after my mastectomy and treatments I started going to MD Anderson and seeing an onc. there, as well as seeing my onc. local. The first thing she said to me was why did I have a mastectomy being stage IV, and that blew my mind. (I mentioned that to my surgeon and she said it was for the best because of the multiple tumors I had) so I told her because I needed one? She had said since I was stage IV it wasn't necessary. That was the first time I had ever had someone tell me that. Appearently the treatments will get to all the mets in your body including the breast.
Hope I made sense, I still feel I have chemo brain.
Good luck.
__________________
stage IV, diagnosed Nov.11,2005
mets to spine,hips,pelvic,femur
4 a/c
mastectomy Feb.14,2006
4 taxol
mets to liver
5 weeks radiation
Herceptin/Zometa
reconstruction Feb.14,2007 (DEIP)
Tykerb/Xeloda
TDM1 study
|
|
|
11-05-2007, 08:52 AM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 415
|
I'm Stage IV, too -no prophylactic mastectomy for me either
Hi~
I'm Stage IV & have been since my primary dx in May 2002.
I initially had a L lumpectomy for the original primary tumor & weeks-years,actually-of chemo to get to the mets in my liver under control.Finally, after a liver resection, my liver is NED x 2yrs!
I did eventually have a L mastectomy, b/c 8 weeks after my liver resection, a 1cm malignant nodule popped up in my breast again & mammo's showed lots of calcifications again. The last thing I wanted was for that local disease to progress and grow and invade my liver again!
My surgical onc also discouraged me from doing a prophylactic mastectomy on the R b/c 'cutting away healthy tissue wouldn't effect my survival prognosis or prevent the bigger problem of distal met from recurring.'
I know that some BC types (lobular?i think, i really don't know) are more likely than others to occur bilaterally & that might be a just reason to pursue a prophylactic mastec on the unaffected side.
But as a Stage IV'er, I'm far more concerned about my liver & every other distal organ that mets like to live & grow than disease in my breasts!Treating local disease feels far less threatening & scary.
I've even recently had a recurrence to 2 supraclavicular nodes, which is a bummer, but my immediate reaction was "But how's my LIVER!!??"
Also, with all the speculation of how surgery & general anesthesia affects dormant, stable micromets, possibly "waking them up" & causing the disease to grow & progress again, why put yourself at risk?
Ultimately, if you feel a prophylactic mastectomy will provide you more peace of mind, then you must do what you feel compelled to do.
Hope my perspective is helpful to you~
Take good care,
jessica
|
|
|
11-05-2007, 10:10 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,014
|
I only had a lumpectomy on the effected breast. I guess they figured if it came back in the breast, that would be the least of my problems, as long as it didn't come back in a major organ. Since I am scanned so often, I don't worry too much about it coming back in the breast. Sometimes I wish I would have just had them whacked off because I really can't stand my breasts now. I actually HATE them sometimes, don't like them touched or anything. I know this is bad and something I need to work through...sherryg
__________________
Sherry
Diagnosed: December , 2005 at age 44
13+ positive lymph nodes
Stage IV , Her2+, 2 small mets to lungsChemo Started: Jan, 2006
4 months Taxotere, Xeloda, Hercepin
NED since April 2006!!
36 Rads to follow with weekly Herceptin indefinately
8 years NED now
Scans every year
Life is not about avoiding the thunderstorms, it's about learning to dance in the rain!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:20 PM.
|