HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2013, 11:49 PM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
from San Antonio…subtype of her2+ER+ bc doesn't respond well to just anti-her2+chemo

identified to have one or more PI3K mutations as the cause of their treatment resistance, demonstrating the need to treat this subtype differently

PIK3CA gene mutations make HER2- and hormone receptor-positive breast cancers treatment-resistant


SAN ANTONIO — Women with breast cancer characterized by high levels of the protein HER2 and hormone receptors gained much less benefit from presurgery treatment with chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapies if their cancer had one or more mutations in the PIK3CA gene, according to results presented here at the 2013 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, held Dec. 10-14.

Treatment given to shrink or eliminate a tumor before surgery is called neoadjuvant therapy. In some women with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy, no residual invasive cancer can be detected in breast tissue samples and lymph nodes removed during surgery. Emerging data suggest that these women, who are said to have had a pathologic complete response, have a greater chance of long-term survival compared with women who do not have a pathologic complete response.

"Mutations in the PIK3CA gene are among the most common genetic aberrations in breast cancer," said Sibylle Loibl, M.D., professor at the German Breast Group in Neu-Isenburg, Germany. "We found that very few women with HER2- and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with a PIK3CA mutation experienced a pathologic complete response after receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

"We need to identify new treatment options for this group of patients and evaluate them in clinical trials," continued Loibl. "We also need to integrate PIK3CA mutation analysis of breast tumors into routine practice so that we can ensure women receive the most appropriate neoadjuvant therapy for their tumor type."

Loibl and colleagues investigated whether the presence of a PIK3CA mutation affected patients enrolled in the GeparSixto (G6) clinical trial in experiencing a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. There were 595 participants in the G6 clinical trial, and information on the presence or absence of PIK3CA gene mutations was available for 512,240 with HER2-postive breast cancer and 272 with triple-negative breast cancer.

Participants in the G6 clinical trial received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel and nonpegylated-liposomal doxorubicin) and were randomly assigned the chemotherapy carboplatin or no additional chemotherapy. Patients with HER2-positive disease also received neoadjuvant trastuzumab and lapatinib, two HER2-targeted therapies, while patients with triple-negative disease also received neoadjuvant bevacizumab.

Loibl and colleagues found that patients with HER2-postive breast cancer were more likely to have at least one PIK3CA mutation in their tumor compared with women with triple-negative breast cancer. Overall, the pathologic complete response rate was lower among women with at least one PIK3CA mutation in their tumor compared with women without a PIK3CA mutation, but the effect was only significant among the group of women with HER2- and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Among these women, patients with a PIK3CA mutation had a pathologic complete response rate of only 6.5 percent compared with 30.8 percent for those without a PIK3CA mutation.

"To evaluate these findings in a group with only one HER2 treatment, we are currently analyzing data from another clinical trial, the GeparQuinto clinical trial, which is a randomized, phase III clinical trial evaluating two different neoadjuvant therapy regimens with a single anti-HER2 treatment [trastuzumab or lapatinib] for women with HER2-positive breast cancer," said Loibl. "We hope to present these results together with those from the G6 clinical trial in San Antonio."

This study was supported by funds from the European Commission's Seventh RTD Framework Programme grant number 278659 "RESPONSIFY." Loibl declares no conflicts of interest.
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2013, 10:15 AM   #2
michka
Senior Member
 
michka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 858
Re: from San Antonio…subtype of her2+ER+ bc doesn't respond well to just anti-her2+ch

Thanks Lani.
__________________
08.2006 3 cm IDC Stage 2-3, HER2 3+ ER+90% PR 20%
FEC, Taxol+ Herceptin, Mastectomy, Radiation, Herceptin 1 year followed by Tykerb 1 year,Aromasin /Faslodex

12.2010 Mets to liver,Herceptin+Tykerb
03.2011 Liver resection ER+70% PR-
04.2011 Herceptin+Navelbine+750mg Tykerb
06.2011 Liver ned, Met to sternum. Added Zometa 09.2011 Cyberknife for sternum
11.2011 Pet clear. Stop Navelbine, continuing on Hercpetin+Tykerb+Aromasin
02.2012 Mets to lungs, nodes, liver
04.2012 TDM1, Ned in 07.2012
04.2015 Stop TDM1/Kadcyla, still Ned, liver problems
04.2016 Liver mets. Back on Kadcyla
08.2016 Kadcyla stopped working. mets to liver lungs bones
09.2016 Biopsy to liver. no more HER2, still ER+
09.2016 CMF Afinitor/Aromasin/ Xgeva.Met to eye muscle Cyberknife
01.2017 Gemzar/Carboplatin/ Ibrance/Faslodex then Taxotere
02.2017 30 micro mets to brain breathing getting worse and worse
04.2017 Liquid biopsy/CTC indicates HER2 again. Start Herceptin with Halaven
06.2017 all tumors shrunk 60% . more micro mets to brain (1mm mets) no symptoms
michka is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter