HonCode

Go Back   HER2 Support Group Forums > her2group
Register Gallery FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2007, 07:14 PM   #1
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
definitely thought this would be of interest to all

will try to add link in a minute:

With comparable efficacy results for the trastuzumab containing arms, the toxicity profiles become more important because the benefit provided by trastuzumab is always associated with some risk. When considering the therapeutic index of the 2 trastuzumab-containing arms, the small, nonstatistically significant difference between TCH and AC-TH needs to be considered in light of the differences in the adverse effects when selecting adjuvant therapy. The cardiac toxicity of the 2 experimental arms significantly favored the TCH regimen. However, no cardiac deaths were observed in either arm. There were 20 congestive heart failure events in the AC-TH arm compared with 4 events in the TCH arm. Moreover, there were 50% fewer asymptomatic declines in left ventricular ejection fraction in the TCH arm compared with the AC-TH arm. Even when considering noncardiac toxicity, the TCH arm appeared to be superior to AC-TH. In particular, the rate of sensory neuropathy was 36.1% for patients who received TCH vs 49.7% for patients given AC-TH. Likewise, nail changes were reported in 28.7% of those in the TCH cohort vs 43.6% in the AC-TH arm. Fewer myalgias (38.6% vs 55.5%) were observed in the TCH vs AC-TH groups. However, more grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia (5.4% vs 1.2%) and anemia (5.8% vs 3.1%) were observed in the TCH arm compared with the AC-TH arm. It is also important to note that 4 patients in the anthracycline- and cyclophosphamide-containing arms developed leukemia, whereas no leukemias occurred in the TCH arm.

In considering the therapeutic index for the 2 trastuzumab-containing arms, it seems prudent to weigh the nonstatistically significant benefit for AC-TH (a decrease of 14 DFS events) against the increase in cardiac toxicity, leukemia incidence, and overall safety profile.
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2007, 07:15 PM   #2
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
link (hope this works)

http://clinicaloptions.com/Oncology/...ry%202007.aspx
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2007, 10:52 PM   #3
Jean
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,154
Thumbs up Great Information...Lani

I do believe we will see a change in the near future on this matter of chemo
Dr. in NY advised A/C but when I went to see Dr. Slamon he advised TCH
along with checking TOPO 11...of which I was negative and the A/C would
not have been compatable.

Great Post Lani,
Thanks
Jean
__________________
Stage 1, Grade 1, 3/30/05
Lumpectomy 4/15/05 - 6MM IDC
Node Neg. (Sentinel node)
ER+ 90% / PR-, Her2+++ by FISH
Ki-67 40%
Arimidex 5/05
Radiation 32 trt, 5/30/05
Oncotype DX test 4/17/06, 31% high risk
TOPO 11 neg. 4/06
Stopped Arimidex 5/06
TCH 5/06, 6 treatments
Herceptin 5/06 - for 1 yr.
9/06 Completed chemo
Started Femara Sept. 2006
Jean is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright HER2 Support Group 2007 - 2021
free webpage hit counter