View Single Post
Old 07-26-2008, 07:04 PM   #32
kcherub
Senior Member
 
kcherub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 292
Debbie...

I don't think you were being harsh. I knew that you were just relaying information from the article (and other sources) to us, and offering your valued opinion.

I suppose I might feel differently if I hadn't found my lump through BSE. I did not and do not follow the taught methodolgy. The implication of the article (to casual readers) could be taken to mean that BSEs are completely useless. That is what worries me--that women will think "Oh, I can just wait until I see my GYN again". Most of those women will not be reading this thread, nor discussing it with others who have been diagnosed with BC (through BSE or not). They may just consider it one less thing to worry about.

I think I would have felt better about the article if they had gone more into what women (who aren't eligible for early detection screening) can do for themselves.

Take care,
__________________
Krista
Diagnosed 3/29/2007 @ age 34
Stage 1, Node Neg. (SNB), Grade 2, 1.4 cm. IDC
ER/PR 90%+ HER2 +
6 TCH started 5/25/2007, ended after #5 due to steroid "reactions" and neuropathy in feet and hands
BUT--#6 CH w/o Taxotere
Begin Herceptin alone 9/28/2007
30 rads completed 12/19/2007
Finish Herceptin 5/9/2008
Stopped Tamoxifen early--HATED it.
Married 17 years
13-year old son
3 embies on ice (from 1999)
GA, USA

kcherub is offline   Reply With Quote