View Single Post
Old 07-09-2007, 10:00 AM   #17
RobinP
Senior Member
 
RobinP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 943
more on scantly positive nodes assoc. worse outcomes...

for T1 cancers where traditionally prognosis is good:

http://www.annalssurgicaloncology.or...t/11/6/568.pdf

http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.or...act/12/22/6696

PS The above studies are interesting because they have lont-term follow-up of 8 and 15 years.

And a divergent opinion, where LVI positivity had more importance, in a SMALL study of 8 year follow-up: (PS not sure I give this same study much stock , especially since the decision of adj. therapy may be a life-saving one.)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi...X.2006.00267.x

To sum it up, overall, micromets and ITC in the sentinel appears to have a play in long-term relapse, and adjuvant therapy may have a role in relapse prevention.

Adj. tx. guidelines are for t1a lesions are aggressive, even without positive lymph node because, "Patients with high-grade tumors and/or LVI may have<sup> </sup>10-year RFS rates of less than 75% in the absence of systemic<sup> </sup>therapy. "...

http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/24/13/2113
__________________
Robin
2002- dx her2 positive DCIS/bc TX Mast, herceptin chemo
RobinP is offline   Reply With Quote