View Single Post
Old 11-15-2006, 07:39 PM   #10
Lani
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,778
putting the thinking cap on...

It may not be possible to do the vertebroplasty at any site that was already irradiated (radiation makes wound healing very slow) but it is unclear how wide the radiation field was (do you know?)

Also, if your mother's kidney function is not tip-top they may feel bisphosphonates are too risky;

Here is an article recommending radiating less times with a higher radiation dose:

ABSTRACT: Prospective randomised multicenter trial on single fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy X 1) versus multiple fractions (3 Gy X 10) in the treatment of painful bone metastases [Radiotherapy & Oncology]
Background and purpose: To investigate whether single-fraction radiotherapy is equal to multiple fractions in the treatment of painful metastases.

Patients and methods: The study planned to recruit 1000 patients with painful bone metastases from four Norwegian and six Swedish hospitals. Patients were randomized to single-fraction (8 Gy x 1) or multiple-fraction (3 Gy x 10) radiotherapy. The primary endpoint of the study was pain relief, with fatigue and global quality of life as the secondary endpoints.

Results: The data monitoring committee recommended closure of the study after 376 patients had been recruited because interim analyses indicated that, as in two other recently published trials, the treatment groups had similar outcomes. Both groups experienced similar pain relief within the first 4 months, and this was maintained throughout the 28-week follow-up. No differences were found for fatigue and global quality of life. Survival was similar in both groups, with median survival of 8-9 months.

Conclusions: Single-fraction 8 Gy and multiple-fraction radiotherapy provide similar pain benefit. These results, confirming those of other studies, indicate that single-fraction 8 Gy should be standard management policy for these patients.
Lani is offline   Reply With Quote