Thread: MUGA vs. echo
View Single Post
Old 03-25-2007, 12:24 AM   #5
jhandley
Senior Member
 
jhandley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne Victoria Australia
Posts: 330
echo picked up fluid MUGA did not.

Hi
I have recently switched to echos because they are less invasive. The echo picked up a small area of fluid in/around the heart (I can't remember where exactly) that the MUGAs did not. I know it wasn't there in 2001 when I had an echo to get on the taxotere trial. So this fluid is possible due to adriamycin (highly likely) or taxotere, CMF, taxol or herceptin.

I am having another echo on 2nd April so will be interested to see if the fluid has increased.
Jackie
jhandley is offline   Reply With Quote