View Single Post
Old 03-29-2008, 10:34 PM   #13
harrie
Senior Member
 
harrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hilo, Hawaii
Posts: 1,867
Those are good arguments on both sides of the issue. For me I understood that it would be a good idea to do the TCH, but also it would not be a bad idea to not do the chemo due to the size of the tumor. 50/50. 50% of good oncologists will recommend it and 50%will say it is not necessary. It appears logical to do the herceptin alone, but studies were done with the herceptin along with chemo.
There are so many of us that have been in the position of trying to juggle the pros and the cons, wanting to be aggresive, but not wanting to do an overkill. Bottom line is that it becomes a personal choice as to what kind of decision you would want to live with.
While trying to decide, I came to the conclusion that to do or not to do the chemo was a win/win situation.
I think age is definitely a consideration. If I was really old, I would probably say forget it! But because I want to be NED for a good 20 - 30 yrs, I went the very aggresive route. I feel good with the decision.
And then when I discovered how manageable the side effects were (maybe i was just lucky) I am REALLY GLAD that I went the whole 9 yards.
harriecanarie (maryanne)
__________________
*** MARYANNE *** aka HARRIECANARIE

1993: right side DCIS, lumpectomy, rads
1999: left side DCIS, lumpectomy, rads, tamoxifen

2006:
BRCA 2 positive
Stage I, invasive DCIS (6mm x 5mm)
Grade: intermediate
sentinal node biopsy: neg
HER2/neu amplified 4.7
ER+/PR+
TOPO II neg
Oncotype dx 20
Bilat mastectomy with DIEP flap reconstruction
oophorectomy

2007:
6 cycles TCH (taxotere, carboplatin, herceptin)
finished 1 yr herceptin 05/07
Arimidex, stopped after almost 1 yr
Femara
harrie is offline   Reply With Quote