View Single Post
Old 05-06-2008, 07:06 PM   #8
Becky
Senior Member
 
Becky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Stockton, NJ
Posts: 4,179
There are studies to support the fact that oncologist's are changing their thinking on breast surgery (lumpectomy or masectomy) on Stage 4 women.

First, the metastatic disease needs to be contained (usually) to one area. Basically, they don't want you loaded with disease.

Second, they want the mets to be stable via treatment (that you are or have responded to chemotherapy).

Getting the primary tumor removed does improve the chance of getting to and possibly staying NED.

The thinking has changed because Stage 4 women can and do do very well for many, many years. Long ago, getting mets was a true death sentence, but that is old thinking. A stage 4 diagnosis does not mean that any longer.

I would continue to investigate surgical options and get even another opinion if you are uncertain. There are studies that show it can throw the odds in your favor even more.
__________________
Kind regards

Becky

Found lump via BSE
Diagnosed 8/04 at age 45
1.9cm tumor, ER+PR-, Her2 3+(rt side)
2 micromets to sentinel node
Stage 2A
left 3mm DCIS - low grade ER+PR+Her2 neg
lumpectomies 9/7/04
4DD AC followed by 4 DD taxol
Used Leukine instead of Neulasta
35 rads on right side only
4/05 started Tamoxifen
Started Herceptin 4 months after last Taxol due to
trial results and 2005 ASCO meeting & recommendations
Oophorectomy 8/05
Started Arimidex 9/05
Finished Herceptin (16 months) 9/06
Arimidex Only
Prolia every 6 months for osteopenia

NED 18 years!

Said Christopher Robin to Pooh: "You must remember this: You're braver than you believe and stronger than you seem and smarter than you think"
Becky is offline   Reply With Quote