[JohnL]

I understand that Roche were so appalled at this article they took an unusual step (drug companies keep their heads down when medicos are arguing as they'll only be accussed of being partisan) of fielding a spokesman.

The language was diplomatic, saying that Roche had "read the editorial and said that the statements it contained were not correct."

Which coming from an official Roche spokesperson is the equivalent of 'This man is an idiot and clearly does not know what he is talking about'. The implication being that the Lancet article was more political opinion about funding as a result of public pressure.

I understand a few other leading lights in the area have broadcast less oblique opinions about the article and its author.

JL